Roles of Self – Efficacy, Goal Setting and Teachers in a Student’s Life
Rashmi Jayaprakash
MAE14120
MA Education (2014 -2016)
Child Development and Learning
Abstract
For this paper, I have chosen to look at motivation in a child’s academic environment. My purpose was to understand the relation of self-efficacy and goal setting for a child. Role of teacher self – efficacy in the student’s life. Finally as a parent and hopefully someday a teacher, I would also like to understand if we can change some of the negative beliefs of a student’s own self-efficacy to motivate him or her to set goals they otherwise thought impossible.
Literature review section talks of three different studies done on the areas of what is self – efficacy. The four
…show more content…
As the child is not an isolated entity in academic spaces, teachers and peers play a vital role in shaping their self – efficacy beliefs. Teacher’s self – efficacy indicates belief in her ability to tutor all her students. Especially the students with low self – efficacy. The teacher would approach her tasks with the same doggedness that a student with high self – efficacy does.
Literature Review:
1. In the study, “Student and teacher self-efficacy and the connection to reading and writing, by Author(s): Julie Corkett, Blaine Hatt and Tina Benevides, Source: Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, Vol. 34, No. 1 (2011), pp. 65-98, the authors mention the importance of self – efficacy in learning literacy skills. They say that learning does not merely depend on the cognitive abilities of the child, but also his or her belief that they can achieve results. Hence the belief on one’s own ability ensures success in the particular field. The study also goes on to say that teacher centered approaches no longer work in academics. The teacher has to pay attention to his or her student’s personal abilities. The reason suggested for this is that once the student internalizes his or her self – efficacy, either positive or negative it is difficult to change. (Student and teacher self-efficacy and the
…show more content…
A teacher with high self – efficacy would make the effort to know each and every student’s abilities. She would persist and make all efforts to ensure that all her students learn. These models of teachers would especially concentrate more on students with difficulties in learning. This is also apparent in our third and final study. A teacher must identify students with low self – efficacy and mentor them in the right direction. Because until we do so, these children will not enjoy their learning experiences. Children will not initiate tasks unless they are motivated and confident that they have caused the outcomes. As children look for peer models, peer – learning should be emphasized. The study also recommends that teachers and adults around the child do not make judgements on their performances. Rather correct their mistakes in a creative manner. Students must be given the reasons for alternatives or choices proposed. This would enable them to think and internalize these choices and would also feel like it was their choice to begin with.
Children with high self – efficacy will set moderate goals for themselves and persist till they achieve success. They will attribute their failures to lack of effort rather than lack of ability. Students with low self – efficacy would avoid setting a goal altogether for the fear of failure. For them it would be the lack of ability that is foremost in their
Self-efficacy is best explained by Bandura (1995) who says that it "refers to beliefs in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations". More simply, self-efficacy is what an individual believes he or she can accomplish using his or her skills under certain circumstances (Snyder & Lopez, 2007). Self-efficacy has been thought to be a task-specific version of self-esteem. The basic principle behind Self-Efficacy Theory is that individuals are more likely to engage in activities for which they have high self-efficacy and less likely to engage in those they do not (Van der Bijl & Shortridge-Baggett, 2002). I think that this research by Snyder & lopez is particularly relevant to Simons case as.
By giving small task to successfully accomplish can increase self- efficacy Behavioral competence The level of knowledge and skill a person have in regards to behavior Increase knowledge to change behavior and affects what they do Expectations What a person thinks will happen if he or she makes a behavior change Improving perceptions of the risk by focusing on that situation. Helping youths overcome their fear of changing. Expectancies Whether a person thinks the expected outcomes is good or rewarded Correcting the perceptions of peer norms.
Instead, it can cause them to underachieve” (Merryman 1). If children get recognition every second of every day of their lives, they will become complacent and satisfied with the work they put out now. They will not continue to improve, but stay at the same level for they do not have anything to push them for improvement. What should actually happen is parents giving their children credit where it is due, but do not give them too much, to where as they still want to improve and get better every single day of their
Achievement within my school is low. Students have low self-esteem and little support from parents about their schooling. I began to wonder, if they had something more meaningful to work towards, if that would increase their achievement. How does student goal setting impact student achievement? As I have set out to answer this question, a key piece needs to be examined.
The importance of motivation as a predictor of school achievement. Learning and Individual Differences. In Rathus, S. A. (2012). Learning. In Psychology: Concepts and connections (10th ed., pp. 216-217).
“Self-efficacy” is an important concept to keep in mind for students who are struggling with their literacy abilities “Research in the field of writing also shows that self-efficacy promotes motivation and learning and that modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation exert desirable effects as well.” (Schunk, 2003, p. 6). Student’s self–efficacy play’s a huge role in their motivation and learning strategies. It is important for all students to have the confidence they need in order to participate in their studies efficiently and effectively. Student’s self-evaluations of their ability to perform in and out of the classroom is what indicates their perception of themselves as a student.
My goal for my students will be for them to always try and push themselves to do the best they can do. I want to build my students’ self-efficacy so they feel confident in themselves that they can perform a specific task well. By the end of the year I want my students to have grown academically, socially, and emotionally and feel well prepared to move on to the next grade level.
Self-determination theory (SDT) assumes that inherent in human nature is the propensity to be curious about one’s environment and interest in learning and developing one’s knowledge (Niemiec & Ryan, 2009). However, educators introduce external controls into learning climates, which can undermine the sense of relatedness between teachers and students, and stifle the natural, volitional processes involved in high-quality learning (Wroten, 2014). The theory identifies that students are intrinsically motivated to learn and that educators should capitalize on this desire when designing instructions. Further, SDT suggests that teachers can capitalize on internal motivation by supporting student curiosity and their desire for autonomy. If educators can find ways to support autonomous motivation in the delivery of instruction, then optimal learning can be achieved (Niemiec & Ryan, 2009).
Self-efficacy beliefs help determine the outcomes that one expects and individuals with more confidence anticipate successful
1.2.1.2 Bandura’s social cognitive theory (1997) While one strand of research grounded in Rotter’s Social Learning Theory developed, a second strand emerged, growing out of Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory and his construct of Self-Efficacy, as initially described in his 1977 article, ‘‘Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change’’. Bandura (1997) defined perceived Self-Efficacy as ‘‘beliefs in one’s capabilities
Some components of teacher efficacy include: developing an organized classroom environment that is supportive of positive and meaningful learning, positive beliefs and development of instructional activities in different domains of learning, engaging the involvement of parents and sourcing resources needed for learning tasks, and redirecting negative influences that may affect the flow of the academic accomplishments of students (Marat, 2007, para. 3). A strategy that can be utilized by administrators in assisting teachers in developing a high degree of teacher efficacy involves providing information on the relevance of learning in students lives. This strategy of providing information on the relevance of learning in the lives of students would be undergirded by a series of workshops that would expose teachers to components of quality and effective learning, the nature of the pubescent child, the role of culture in the process of assimilation and equilibration and how learning can be developed and supported by positive self-beliefs among students with low-self image. Workshops would be conducted for three hours per week and would involve a reflective component where teachers selected for this
On the contrary, it requires students’ determination to succeed and advance in the reading process being aware of their strengths and weaknesses to set their own goals and strategies taking into account their needs and letting them assess their performance. Usually, “most of the learners are not aware of their abilities and potential to work by themselves to enrich their learning process.” even though self-directed learning allows learners to be more effective learners and social beings ( Abdulah, 2007,p.
Student motivation and performance were assumed to be significant reinforces for teaching behaviors. Thus, Teachers with a high level of Efficacy believed that they could control, or at least strongly influence, student achievement and motivation, thus the concept of Teacher Efficacy was originated. Teacher Efficacy has been defined as "the extent to which the Teacher believes he or she has the capacity to affect student performance" (Berman, McLaughlin, Bass, Pauly, & Zellman, 1977, p. 137), or as "Teachers' belief or conviction that they can influence how well students learn, even those who may be difficult or unmotivated" (Guskey & Passaro, 1994, p.
Success does not come to all but comes to those who are are worthy of being successful. Outstanding people are always happy and they have a positive attitude and strive to be better than what they were before. Many people see a student who did not graduate as unsuccessful and as a failure in life. Maybe they failed one test and which cause him or her not to graduate. People who don’t have failures in their life can not say they have learned from their mistakes to become a better person.
Joedie May A. Valeros August 26, 2015 Maria Keanna Muyargas Psych 180 Self-Efficacy Theory: Implications for Social Facilitation and Social Loafing In Sanna's article entitled Self-Efficacy Theory: Implications for Social Facilitation and Social Loafing, he presented and tested an expectancy-based model of social facilitation and social loafing, particularly Banduira's Self-efficacy Theory. In Triplett's social facilitation experiment, as cited by Sanna (1992), he concluded that working together led to better performance than when working alone. Contrary, Ringelmann's social loafing experiment, as also cited in the article, said that working atogether ld to worse performance than working alone. Sanna (1992) uses the Self-Efficacy