Technological advancement has affected each and every area of the human being’s life and warfare is not an exception. With new technological shifts, come new ways of doing and handling things. In that light therefore, it is undeniable that contemporary military and war strategies will rely heavily on technology as a competitive edge. This informs that the traditional battlefield wars experienced during the World Wars will be replaced with contemporary computerized and technological warfare – whereby human contact will be rare. This discussion essay takes a magnified look into the effects of technology on warfare strategies of global militaries. The discussion will study why technology oriented strategies will dominate contemporary and future warfare. The changing roles of human beings in warfare will be scrutinized and discussed in a bid to understand the effects of technology on warfare. The main purpose of this discussion paper is to investigate the …show more content…
According to Foley (2011), the World War II is a paradigm warfare whereby the application of newly devised military technologies altered the battlefield. The introduction of the radar and bombsight detection technologies determined the victors from the losers in the war . This position is not unique to that long past time but is also prevalent now in the information era as explained in the above discussion. In a nutshell, the future of war will be more robotic, computerized and technologically oriented, as a result, there will be fewer and fewer human contacts in the battlefield as wars will be fought on technological fronts. The human being soldier should therefore consider him/herself divorced from war thanks to the advantages of ever evolving technologies. The application of technological skills in the development and operation of the computerized weapons systems will be the remaining duties of military
World War One and World War Two were both conflicts which involved Germany, due to the clashes among opposing alliances of empires. Repeating rifles and machine guns were used extensively in World War One and its modern version were used in World War Two creating a more deadly impact. Also, the use of planes played a minor role in World War, but became the prevailing force within World War Two. Although there were similarities, there were major differences in warfare; in World War One soldiers fought from lines of trenches and were supported by artillery, machine guns, infantry assault, early aeroplanes, tanks and poisonous gas. All of these methods were mostly stationary in nature with minimal mobility, World War Two on the other hand was
The art of war passed through a fundamental transformation, especially in the eighteenth and nineteenth-centuries. Changes involved all aspects of warfare, strategy, operations, logistics and tactics. That period saw unprecedented economic, social, and political change. Therefore, the manner in which a given society wages war is the typical product of the whole societal, political, and economic system for that society. While the economic, societal and politic order that characterized the period between the religion wars and the French revolution had limited warfare; mass politics, nationalism and the industrial revolution which marked the era of the French revolution and the U.S. Civil War remade warfare from its strategic, operational, logistic
The war can be seen in many different aspects, sometimes good most times not so good. The war past, present and future can be a hard topic for most. War novels, writing about the war, or even talking about the war can be very difficult for most people to talk and share their experiences. People are affected by the war in many different ways, and tend to deal with the affects differently. The effects on war not only affects the person who experienced the war hands on but also the people around them also.
War is a transformative event due to the people at first believing war is exciting opportunity that they should not miss out but later it seemed to be frightening and gloomy which changed them emotionally as well they may get injured and transform the physically. As said by Stefan Zweig in The World of Yesterday which is about Austrians excitement of going into WWI, “the young people were honestly afraid that they might miss this most wonderful and exciting experience of their lives; that is why they shouted and sang in the trains that carried them to the slaughter”(Document H). At first it shows how excited everyone was but then they experience war which causes them to realise that war is not a great time but it is a horrific event that will
“European nations began world war 1 with a glamorous vision of war, only to be psychologically shattered by the realities of the trenches, the experience changed the way people referred to the glamour of battle , they treated it no longer as a positive quality but a dangerous illusion.” (Virginia Postrel) Many soldiers did not expect WW1 to be as gruesome as it was. “The War To End All Wars” changed the way people looked at war not just soldiers but the families and friends at home.
War has always been terrifying and results in catastrophic effects for every person involved civilian or otherwise. Mental illness is one of the worst effects and it cripples people, one of the biggest illnesses is PTSD. PTSD is post traumatic stress disorder and often happens to soldiers and civilians who are in the direct line of fire because of the war. These civilians are usually being persecuted for example the Jewish during the Holocaust. War is a devastating occurrence that takes millions of lives and has a lasting effect on every person that it touches; Unbroken, Night by Eliezer Wiesel, Farewell to Manzanar by James D. Houston and Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston, and “Behind Bars, Vets With PTSD Face a New War Zone With Little Support” all
"We want to live at any price; so we cannot burden ourselves with feelings which, though they might be ornamented enough in peacetime, would be out of place here" (Remarque, Erich. All Quiet on the Western Front). This quote symbolizes how much war changes your humane mentality. The soldiers that died were thrown in shell holes. Close friends became victims in war, and that no longer bothered the
Can an antiquated lens provide an adequate examination and understanding of modern warfare? The theories of Carl von Clausewitz retain remarkable contemporary merit and relevance in explaining the critical elements affecting warfare in the modern era. Carl von Clausewitz’s theories of war endeavor to be comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic. Clausewitz contends that the conduct of war itself is without doubt very difficult. But the difficulty is not that erudition and great genius are necessary to understand the basic principles of warfare.1 Clausewitz 's 1812 essay, the Principles of War, offers military commanders, with little campaign experience, a comprehendible, comprehensive, and strategic model for attaining victory in battle.
The book All Quiet on the Western Front takes place during World War I. The author, Erich Maria Remarque, describes how dehumanizing war can be for soldiers who give their life to serve their country and protect it. Remarque specifically describes the hardships of a German soldier Paul during the war. Through Remarque’s story we learn that war affects relationships, thought processes, natural instincts and many more functions of a soldier. We learn over the course of this book that all soldiers change through war.
With the recent creation of nuclear bombs, no one knew the magnitude of the damage that would be caused, but everybody for sure feared it. The Cold War went on for many years beyond the 1960’s, and the amount of fear felt by millions remained. Modern warfare, compared to warfare in the 1960’s, has changed drastically. The modern war fought was the war in Iraq after 9/11. The war in Iraq began March 19, 2003, and began with the bombing of Baghdad after other means had failed (“The War on Terrorism…” 1-4).
Introduction Technology and war are closely related as it shapes the strategies adopted by nations and also influence the outcome of the war . Technological advancements are also driven by war due to the perceived needs to stay ahead and stay relevant in the new era so as to provide a technological edge against potential adversaries2. Although technology employed during war does provide an advantage against potential adversaries, however, it does not always result in a decisive advantage or victory in war. As demonstrated during the Vietnam War in the 1960s, the US who are armed with far superior technology advantages over the Viet Cong (VC) forces had failed to capitalise on it to win a decisive war. As a result, the US fought a long and costly
Advancements in Weaponry Throughout America’s history of war, weaponry has played a major factor in conflict. Weapons were improved for the benefit of the American soldiers. Since American war instruments have been improved in technology, the U.S was able to exceed over their opponents in war from the Colonial Era to the Antebellum Era. The usage of improved weaponry was a major advantage for the United States.
a. The Army White Paper seeks define ourselves as a Profession of Arms and as Professional Soldiers in the era of constant conflict that we now live in. The paper is a thoughtful look into the past, present and future of our profession. It will have top leaders thinking about the direction of our profession and ways to keep the American Soldier a professional in his field. b. The beginning of the paper talks about the Army as a profession of arms by posing the question, “what does it mean to be a professional?”.
Innovation assumed a critical part in World War II. A portion of the innovations utilized amid the war were created amid the interwar years of the 1920s and 1930s, much was produced in light of necessities and lessons learned amid the war, while others were starting to be produced as the war finished. Numerous wars effectsly affected the advancements that we use in our day by day lives. Notwithstanding, contrasted with past wars, World War II had the best impact on the innovation and gadgets that are utilized today. Innovation likewise assumed a more noteworthy part in the behavior of WWII than in whatever other war ever, and had a basic part in its last result.
Personal vision about the future of cyberwarfare Cyberwarfare already exists in reality and has been spread out among countries or organizations over the past few decades. The rising technologies including artificial intelligence and computational neural networks used by future computers will not only be significant in a new era of power and communications, but will also broaden the channel for cybercrimes, attacks and warfare. Future cyberwarfare will continue to scale up attacks against governments, corporations and even civilians in the next decade where it will be on par with traditional military and will might surpass these tactics. Future cyberwarfare will not just be targeted against military agencies or other government agencies.