In the book Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag is the main character. He is a fireman, and in the book firemen start fires, or more specifically burn books. The society within Fahrenheit 451 is focused on technology, and literature is banned in all forms, and soon all types will become non-existent. Since technology is the main component of their life, the citizens have lost their social skills and now barely ever communicate with one another. This leads to consequences that the citizens have to face. Bradbury foreshadows the future of the US by showing how technology is their main focus in life, leading to the citizens not caring about anything else in their society. The technology in the book Fahrenheit 451 is portrayed similarly to what the U.S. …show more content…
The world that these characters live in is centered around technology and how it can be used to replace things that were available many years ago. One of these ended up being social interaction. The school system is a prime example of this. It was explained as, “An hour of TV class, an hour of basketball or baseball or running, another hour of transcription history or painting pictures” (Bradbury 27). In Montag’s world, technology and futuristic devices have interfered with face to face interactions between people. Even in school, children are taught by videos that give out the answers. There is no social interaction exchanged between students because their society frowns upon it. This means that the students aren’t taught to have compassion toward others. An example of this is when a teenager driving their car attempts to hit Montag later on in the book. The relationship between Montag and his wife, Mildred, is another example of social disconnection. Early in the book Montag is frustrated with his wife saying, “She had both ears plugged with electronic bees that were humming the hours away” (Bradbury 16). In the book, Mildred always wants the newest technology and is always using what technology they have. Most of the time she either has electronic bees, an analogy for headphones, or she is watching the three TV walls that they have in their living room. Because of this, she and Montag are very disconnected and barely ever have full, meaningful conversations with one another. When she tries to overdose on pills, it clearly shows how unhappy Mildred is with her life and the society she’s in, but it also shows the lack of compassion she has for her husband. She is willing to kill herself and leave her husband just because she is unhappy. Mildred made no attempt to talk to Montag about her problems or what she was going through. Since they
Previously, Montag had been yelling at her and her friends about the flaws in their society, as well as reading a part of a poem, which was considered illegal. “‘Was it my wife turned in the alarm?’ Beatty nodded,” (Bradbury 117). By turning Montag in to the authorities, Mildred had finally put her foot down and made one of the first real decisions in her life. The reader still pities Mildred, even though her actions harmed her husband, because Bradbury has built her character to show how her actions reflected upon her battle between choosing her society or her family.
In the text Montag noticed, “She had both ears plugged with electronic bees that were humming the hour away,” (Bradbury 16). This reflects on Mildred and Montags relationship because instead of talking to each other Mildred always has her ear buds in. She sits there neglecting her surroundings which shows Montag that she could care less about everything that's going on around her. As Montag starts to realize what the world really is, Mildred says, “Funny, how funny, not to remember where or when you met your husband or wife” (Bradbury 40). While Montag is frustrated with trying to figure out when they met Mildred casually laughs about it.
‘That’s my family.’ ‘Will you turn it off for a sick man?’ ‘I’ll turn it down.’” Mildred is more concerned about listening and paying attention to her tv “family” that she doesn’t pay any attention to Montag. They can’t express themselves because they don’t know how to share their feelings.
Mildred obviously overdosed and Montag was trying to explain it to her but she just won't listen or genuinely doesn't believe him which is unlikely. In the passage, you can see how much Mildred is trying to convince Montag and herself that she would never overdose. This led to very obvious delusion because Mildred would rather be crazy than have to talk about something important or something worth thinking about with her husband. By the end, it shows how Montag was also quick to just let go of the topic in order to avoid conflict of irritation with his wife.
(Bradbury 41). Montag considers that he and Mildred are disconnected because the walls between them get in the way of their relationship. Since all Mildred is doing is getting more and more machines, there are fewer real-life connections and a lack of interaction in their marriage. (STEWE-2): Montag came home sick and asked Mildred to get him aspirin and water and turn down the parlor.
Good God, who were those men? I never saw them before in my life!” (Bradbury 14) After Montag thinks about this it makes him realize that no one knows anyone because everyone is just always watching their Palor instead of talking to people and forming a real connection with them and not just a fake one to be accepted. As the further, the novel progresses, the more Montag realizes how unhappy people are in his society and the more he wants to do something about
This exemplifies how Mildred does not confront her feelings. Instead, she drives very quickly and tries to numb herself from the pain. She ends up screaming and going fast thinking it will help her but she is just destroying herself. She even advised Montag to “Go take the beetle” (Bradbury 61) when he was angry.
She's miserable. She feels no love. She has no hope. And she's extremley depressed and suicidal. Bradbury shows that by comparing Montag, and mildred.
Montag takes it upon himself to educate and enlighten himself by reading books, which are banned in his society. As he immerses himself in literature, he gains a deeper understanding of the world and begins to question the government's control over information. He becomes determined to share what he has learned with others and he attempts to engage with his wife, Mildred, and her friends in a conversation about literature, “The room was blazing hot, he was all fire, he was all coldness; they sat in the middle of an empty desert with three chairs and him standing, swaying, and him waiting for Mrs. Phelps to stop straightening her dress hem and Mrs. Bowles to take her fingers away from her hair. Then he began to read in a low, stumbling voice that grew firmer as he progressed from line to line, and his voice went out across the desert, into the whiteness, and around the three sitting women there in the great hot emptiness.” After the conversation, Montag realizes the shallow and empty nature of the society he lives in as people are consumed by mindless entertainment and lack genuine connections.
Gavin O’Dell Mrs. Magnusson and Dr. Dumont Roots of Thought Honors R4/S4 10 February 2023 Warmth and Cold Developing Guy Montag’s Journey Fahrenheit 451 is a dystopian novel written in the early 1950s by Ray Bradbury. The book takes place in a society that has given up knowledge, most prevalently books, and embraced ignorance and brain-numbing technology to keep themselves uninformed and content. This story revolves around Guy Montag, a fireman whose job is to burn books. Once Guy learns the true value of knowledge his eyes are opened to how truly drab and meaningless his society is. Bradbury uses similes, metaphors and imagery to form a subtle, yet strong association between fire and warmth representing ignorance, and cold and water representing
Montag hides some books until he finds the courage to read them. He goes from burning books to a book reader, effectively demonstrating his objection towards his society. The society forces people to watch their television instead of going outside or having meaningful conversations. They don’t even have porches“’[… but Clarisse’s] uncle say that was merely rationalizing it; the real reason, hidden underneath, might be they didn’t want people sitting like that, doing nothing, rocking, talking; that was the wrong kind of social life.
Even though Mildred and Montag have been married for ten years, after she overdoses, Montag confesses that "he was certain he wouldn't cry '' (44) even if she died. Demonstrating the absence of social connection among the civilians, as even Mrs Bowles treated her children with little concern and considered them nuisances (93). Additionally, when Montag asks Mildred how and when they met, Mildred answers that she can't remember and that it doesn't matter since she needs to focus on her parlour (9). Similarly, many citizens relied on technologies such as parlour walls for entertainment and enjoyment rather than bonding with one
Montag's experiences with hollow, toxic relationships in his local community represent how an absence of real bonding purges away human qualities such as love and interconnection. Several meaningless relationships expose their true colors in Montag's experiences with Mildred and her friends. Following a frightening night of Mildred's pill overdose, Montag asks Mildred where they first met before marriage. Mildred replies, "It doesn't matter" (Bradbury 41). Montag then deliberates "that if she died, he was certain that he wouldn't cry" (Bradbury 41).
They choose to ignore others. And they choose to become emotionally isolated. Mildred is using technology for herself, while Montag would like to become educated to help others. He knows that there are others that are like him, and he could possibly help them. However, when Mildred is portrayed as Montag’s foil and as a representation of how society has been reduced to a bunch of mindless clowns, Ray Bradbury portrays the element of emotional
Montag realizes that not everyone is willing to see the faults in their society. Trying to change that is futile. The reader, in turn, recognizes that many people are afraid of knowing more. They are afraid of seeing the wrong in what was perceived as perfect, as good, as