In many cases, the interests of the victim or his/her family mirror the state’s interests. But in other cases, those interests will diverge. For example, the family of a murder victim may understandably seek revenge in the form of the stiffest sentence possible, such as the death penalty. However, the prosecutor may opt to resolve the case expeditiously with, say, a life sentence. The fact that prosecutors represent the state doesn’t necessarily mean they can do whatever they want with a case and ignore the victim or his/her family.
The law on double jeopardy has a 1“legal heritage of 800 years”. It has been under criticism in recent years as guilty criminals can get away with crimes from a technicality in the justice system. This law stops the retrial of accused criminals who in their trials were proven guilty. I personally disagree with the current double jeopardy laws and believe that changes need to be implemented in the current law to make them more just. The case of Raymond John Carroll is spread over decades and as it developed more witnesses came forward and better technology also developed.
One thing that would hold is the cover up that his piers were convicted of dealing with his crime and the juveniles testimonies if they all were similar to Sandusky’s ways to which the jury will be convinced. However the leads that the authorities have that show how many
With that said, there are still many issues the county must deal with in the future. These include making more jobs, increasing wages for existing jobs and, offering more jobs with a living wage. For this county to see further growth, it must put an emphasis on discerning new ways to pull more people into the populace through jobs, attractions, and other factors of that influence livelihood. As a largely rural county, this means Kittitas County must look at the positive aspects of other rural areas in the Pacific Northwest as well as throughout the nation to find which characteristics can also apply to this county, and how to incorporate those aspects effectively. More research is also needed for more concrete health data, census numbers, and understanding of which areas the county will need to focus on in the future, following its work to provide more accessible and affordable quality healthcare to the population.
Attempts have been made to modernize the Texas constitution every now and then since its selection in 1876. Genuine enthusiasm for sacred change and amendment. It was apparent in 1957 to 1961,1967 to 1969,1971 to1974, and to some degree 1991 through 1993, and 1999. The main change exertion that brought about an open door for the electorate to choose another record came in 1975. Through 1971 to 1974 exertion was vital for two reasons.
One of these is the ideal of ‘innocent until proven guilty’. Hammurabi outlines the importance of this with law three: “3. If any one bring an accusation of any crime before the elders, and does not prove what he has charged, he shall, if it be a capital offense charged, be put to death.” This law places incredible pressure on the accuser forcing them to have evidence to back up their claim. The elders are also protected by the concept of innocent until proven guilty, they are not punished as soon as someone accuses them of a crime but are rather innocent until there is provided evidence that proves them to be guilty. This principal is present today in some form in almost all legal systems and cultures around the world.
Voter Turnout in Texas As stated in the prompt voter turnout in the state of Texas is amongst the lowest in the nation. Many people seem to be confused or in awe as to why Texas has such a low voting rate. The truth in reality is that there are quite a few reasons why the turnout in Texas is so low. The state of Texas has a fast growing Hispanic demographic group. When Hispanics do go out and vote they normally tend to vote democratic.
In other words, they believe there’s no doubt the Texas Justice System is for sale, for most judges in Texas have been found committing serious felonies during their professions (“The Mess in Texas: State and Federal Judges Accused of Everything from Arson to Corruption to Sexual Assault,” 2008). After conducting further research on this case, I could understand why those from 60 minutes feel angry about the idea. The first thing that caught my attention was Rick Perry. Even though Rick Perry was the former governor of Texas and not a judge, I feel that Texas have a tendency to choose corrupt and those who like to abuse their power. I still believe that every citizen should have a final say with not just presidents and government officials in Washington DC, but judges as well.
Part 1 Explain the process of competency restoration. According to Hubbard, Zapf, & Ronan, (2003), “Competency restoration is the process used when an individual charged with a crime is found by a court to be incompetent to stand trial, typically due to an active mental illness or an intellectual disability.” Before the legal process can continue, a suspect should be restored to competency. That gives the suspect the chance to consult with his or her defense lawyer to have a factual and rational understanding of the legal proceedings. Describe why the process of competency restoration is important. The importance of competency restoration is wide and broad in court proceedings.
One of the amendments is trial by jury. This means if you are charged with a felony, then you have the right to have a trial with a jury of your peers. If you don’t want one, then your trial will be with a judge. Sometimes you don’t have a choice, if the charge is significant enough it will go straight to a trial by