ipl-logo

Texas Justice System Case Study

465 Words2 Pages

In previous occasions, the state of Texas has been known for being different with regard to gun control and stand your grounds. In this occasion, however, it has to do with the judges. Texas is one of many states that give the residents the ability to choose who will be the judges, unlike most states where the governor has final say (Horwitz, 2014). In other words, the decision of the judge all depends on the people of the lone star state. The political point of view has an influence as well. In this case, the Texas have a choice of choosing a democrat or republican judge when they walk into the polls to vote like any person running as a politician (Horwitz, 2014). As far as what i think about Texans appointing the judge, I believe that …show more content…

In other words, they believe there’s no doubt the Texas Justice System is for sale, for most judges in Texas have been found committing serious felonies during their professions (“The Mess in Texas: State and Federal Judges Accused of Everything from Arson to Corruption to Sexual Assault,” 2008). After conducting further research on this case, I could understand why those from 60 minutes feel angry about the idea. The first thing that caught my attention was Rick Perry. Even though Rick Perry was the former governor of Texas and not a judge, I feel that Texas have a tendency to choose corrupt and those who like to abuse their power. I still believe that every citizen should have a final say with not just presidents and government officials in Washington DC, but judges as well. The judges and governors that are elected by the Texans, however, should be monitored more frequently because of prior incidents. The fact and the matter is that most state and federal judges have spent more time behind bars and in trouble with the law than they spend time working since the show 60 minutes addressed their opinions about the Criminal Justice System in Texas (“The Mess in Texas: State and Federal Judges Accused of Everything from Arson to Corruption to Sexual

Show More
Related

  • Christopher Dupuy Case Study

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    Texas State commission on judicial conduct suspended Judge Christopher Dupuy without pay following his indictment by a state grand jury on two counts of obstruction, retaliation; 3 counts of abuse of official capacity. According to news reports, Laird represented the judge’s former wife in a custody battle over their children. After refusing to give a deposition, the judge held her in contempt, which was overturned on appeal. Another count in the complaint alleges that he used a couny fax machine to send legal documents on behalf on his then- fiancé. Judge Dupuy has been a targeted because he has spoken out against widespread, long-term corruption in the Galveston County court system.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Chapter 11 Of Mind Tap Political Science

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Chapter 11 I have read the Chapter 11 of the book Mind Tap Political Science. In this chapter, the author has described about court framework that capacities in Texas. The principal part portrays a gathering panel. It represents a board that has both of its individuals in the house and in addition the Senate. Author goes onwards and talks about of all issues that these courts handle and cover.

    Read More

  • Texas Defense Case Study

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Texans were a dumpster fire, in the worst divisi0n in the NFL. Ryan Mallet missed a flight to Miami, where Houston was beaten down. Arian Foster was lost for the season during a meaningless drive. The quarterback situation was bleak, and the defense wasn 't living up to the immense expectations placed on it during the offseason. Many fans were calling for head coach Bill O 'Brian 's head, and there was reported tension between GM Rick Smith and the coaching staff.

    Read More

  • 12th Justice System Case Study

    416 Words  | 2 Pages

    I find myself writing you asking for guidance within the walls of the 12th Justice System. My daughter continues to be in the middle of ledge issues with the adopted mother of my granddaughter. However, this is a family matter, in which we will have to figure out on our end.

    Read More

  • Alonza Thomas V. 21: Juvenile Justice System

    899 Words  | 4 Pages

    At the age of 16 years old Alonza Thomas, a typical teenage boy, was given a 13 year sentence for second degree armed robbery. It all started when he ran away from home; his mother was upset with him so he left to avoid dealing with the problem. He met someone while trying to find a place to stay and he offered him a place to sleep and some hot food. When Alonza had finally decided it was time for him to go home and face his mother, they demanded that he repay them somehow. They held him at gun point, making it apparent that they weren’t going to back down if he went against what they wanted.

    Read More

  • Political Distrust In Texas Research Paper

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    The extremely poor education system in Texas has resulted in the lowest number citizens with high school diplomas and, therefore, an extremely low voter turnout. E.J. Davis led the most corrupt

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of A Grand Jury

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    In theory, grand juries sound like they are for the common good, but in reality they return ninety- five percent of cases, that have been brought to them. There was previous history to why grand juries are used in american politics today, not only for Texas government. According to, Columbia Law Review, it originated during the reign of Edward III. The term, le Grande Inquest, means that the best gentleman on the county, sit on a jury to determine if the criminal is guilty or not guilty.

    Read More

  • Texas House Of Representatives Essay

    902 Words  | 4 Pages

    So basically, both have a large leeway extension on choosing committee membership towards they’re belonging respective house and as well they have a huge influence on lawmaking in the state. Thus, it’s only the governor who is able to call the Legislature into a special session, because the legislature isn’t able at all to call itself into one as in other state cases. But the governor may call as many sessions as he desires to do so. Following that, the Texas Constitution responsibility is to limit the duration of each special session to thirty days, where Lawmakers are able to take in hand only those matters chosen by the governor in his “call,” So, ultimately both Legislature houses are usually very organized on the bipartisan basis with those members of the two different

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

    1521 Words  | 7 Pages

    Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

    Read More

  • Brock Turner Case Study

    465 Words  | 2 Pages

    A fair and unbiased court system is necessary for the legal system. The role of the court is to correct any injustice, not to compound it. When prejudice and corruption leak into the courts, what recourse do we have for eradicating them from society? Our judges must be stalwarts of integrity because the power to move our country forward or hold our country back often lies in their hands. Judge Persky had the power to bring justice to a victim, to help her and her family move forward.

    Read More

  • The Five Levels Of The Texas Court System

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Texas State Court system is very structured. There are 5 levels of the Texas Courts. Level 5 starts with Justice and Municipal Courts. Justice Courts have Jurisdiction over civil actions, small crimes, and criminal misdemeanors. The Municipal courts have jurisdiction over municipal ordnance cases and criminal misdemeanors that are only punishable by fine.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

    462 Words  | 2 Pages

    When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

    Read More

  • Essay On Gun Control In Texas

    1507 Words  | 7 Pages

    The gun ownership in this specific state is more accessible and let qualified applicants carry any firearms that are under the limitations of the law provided. In addition, citizens, and including the majority of responsible law abiding gun owners, understand we should change the laws related to gun control in the state of Texas. Having in mind that states with the most gun laws tend to have the fewest guns deaths. The

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Texas Death Penalty In The United States

    932 Words  | 4 Pages

    To win any kind of election/re-election candidates must work to please voters. Here in Texas where a majority of people have a strong pro-death penalty stance, judges must also have a strong stance regarding the death penalty if they would like to remain in office. This is concerning because judges will be more likely to seek he death penalty for the convicted so they can create a record of toughness to win over voters. Some elected judges are sometimes of lesser quality than appointed judges in other states, but since they have a record of toughness everything else is thrown out the window. District attorneys also try to maintain a tough reputation as well.

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

    Read More

More about Texas Justice System Case Study

Open Document