A highly debated subject is- who should choose the novel to read in class, the teacher or the student? This argument is not one sided, as both sides are supported. I support that the teachers should decide on which books to read in class. The teachers have a better understanding of the curriculum, there won’t be conflict among students, and the teachers have a wider variety of book knowledge. To start, the teachers have a better understanding of the curriculum. The teacher 's job is to evaluate the standard and teach it to the students, which includes picking books reflecting the curriculum. This further establishes that the students are the ones being taught, and it isn’t their job to evaluate the standard and decide which book the class should read. In fifth grade, my class read The Tale of Despereaux, which was chosen by my teacher, and the class thoroughly enjoyed the book. This shows that the teacher evaluated the curriculum and decided on a book that reflected the standard and interested the students.
Additionally, if the teacher chooses the book, there won’t be conflict among students. In second grade, the class was deciding if we should have a pizza, cupcake, or pajama party. The class was of course divided between the three, and there was conflict. This expresses that when the
…show more content…
The teachers have a college education, are older than the students, and have more experience with books. This expresses that the teachers are more qualified to select books because they have more experience and knowledge with books. Malala Yousafzai once said, “Let us remember: one book, one pen, one child, and one teacher can change the world.” If that book is chosen by the student, it probably won’t have the same effect if the “book smart” teacher chose it. This shows that if the teacher who is “book smart” doesn’t decide on the book to read, then it may change the course of the student’s
Having never taken a college writing course before, I did not know what to expect and therefore assumed that I would choose my own topic to write about; of course, this isn’t the case. However, if I had the choice, I would not have chosen to write a response to Gerald Graff’s “Hidden Intellectualism”. After going through his essay with a fine-tooth comb, I have found a few flaws in his reasoning. Gerald Graff believes that schools and colleges are not taking advantage of “street smarts” by not using them in an intellectual setting when in fact, schools are providing students with a large assortment of other knowledge and skills. In Graff’s essay “Hidden Intellectualism”, he argues for the importance of changing school curriculums in order to better reflect the interests
I chose to read, “Dragons Love Tacos,” and “The Giving Tree” to two ELL students at Hope Community Charter School. “Dragons Love Tacos,” according to scholastics, has an interest level from grades K to 2nd while its reading level is 3.1. “The Giving Tree” is also geared towards grades k through 2nd. However, its reading level is 2.6. “The Giving Tree,” is a classic story about a young boy growing up and his relationship with a female tree.
She believes the syllabus provided to students do not include any challenging books, and her belief toward high school teachers becoming too lazy to examine thoroughly if the book the education system provides them with represent any true and significant value is a recurring concern of hers’- therefore ineffective to students. All in all, Prose used ethos, pathos, logos and the usage of specific words to help her argument. She successfully persuades her point of view and makes it clear that if schools want their curriculum to improve, they must change their way of teaching and push their students to view literature in a new
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.
Fahrenheit 451 has an astonishingly accurate future depiction of a society in which everyone is too distracted by technology, so they ignore most of the world around them. The community members are not aware of nature or other human beings, and they never take time to actually think deeply about life and ideas in general. Many high school and middle school teach this book in curriculums nationwide, because the addiction to technology and hatred of books portrayed in the book is beginning to be prevalent in our society. This book also glorifies individuality by admiring a girl who is different from everyone else. In the past, many parents have decided to challenge this book due to the violence, the religious discrimination, the foul language, and the references to drinking and smoking.
Different types of literature open new doors through which students’ can explore the unknown and expand their knowledge of controversial topics. The great examples found in literature have been the subject of much debate, as school boards wrestle with whether children should be allowed to read such difficult, harsh topics, as said in the article “How Banning Books Marginalizes Children” (Source F). There are so many brilliant works of literature spanning a wide variety of genres and topics, and a single school board should not determine what students learn. No one is proposing that second graders read The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, but rather that we intentionally choose literature that will expand, rather than limit, children’s options and minds. Not only do these great works lay the groundwork for our future generation, but they also serve to diversify students’ writing and analysis skills.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
Students can use books to grow their knowledge about our everyday day life. “It is important to help students see that everyone 's view counts” (Scales). By allowing students to see different points of views they’re able to experience situations unfamiliar to them and learn about different cultures and societies. If they don’t have the opportunity to read these books then they might miss out on these vital lessons. Children need to know about sensitive topics and strong ideas.
Books, Should We Ban Them Or Not: Banned books are books that have been taken out of public environments because of many different reasons. Books should not be banned simply because we have the rights to any books. Banned Books can teach important things about our history. Books that have been banned teach great morals/lesson even with the negative content. Banning Books infringes on people 's personal rights.
The statement discusses how regardless of how hard you attempt to keep books from kids they will dependably figure out how to peruse a book that isn't permitted. “Race relations remain a central and difficult issue in this country. Recent events in Ferguson, Baltimore, and beyond have demonstrated this point. Attempts to remove a book like “Mockingbird” from the curriculums of schools is not only an affront to free speech, but it exacerbates the problem Americans continue to have with race relations.” (“Banning books deprives students of complex discussion”).
This outlook is reflected in national surveys, the number of literary non-readers in the United States is starting to outweigh the number of readers and, this has slowly been proceeding over the past 20 years (Gioia 421). Reading is a fundamental part of life. It’s a major way of expression, imagination, learning and being the best person
Some parents may dislike the books provided at their child's school, but the books are there for the children, not the parents. According to Webster
There are public schools all over the world and those in public schools are not getting the proper education that they need. It seems public schools only provide the public with the bare minimum. This bare minimum can become very discouraging to parents, students and the entire public community in which the school is. Most Supreme Court rulings agree that school districts across the nation, and across the world, really only need to provide the bare minimum legally. This present an issue, if the professionals are only supposed to give the bare minimum then they themselves will be given the bare minimum.
(What if everything you've been taught is wrong?) (Prompt) The ideas we learn at an early age construct mental barriers that limit our openness to new ideas that appear later in life. This is a fact that has been proven throughout history. For example, the majority of Europe was convinced in the 1500s that Earth was the center of the universe, and it wasn't until Copernicus's innovative idea of a heliocentric universe that anyone openly questioned this idea.