The United States of America blesses us with the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition, and many others. We have the liberty to choose our own actions, but should that liberty allow us to choose actions that could potentially take away other people’s freedoms? In his book On Liberty, Philosopher John Stuart Mill says a person can do whatever they want as long as is does not harm others. If a person’s actions only affects the individual, society and the government have no right to intervene. Only when someone’s actions become harmful to others should it should be stopped. This idea is known throughout the book as the harm principle. Mill’s philosophy can still be applied to many …show more content…
"A person who is texting can be as impaired as a driver who is legally drunk," said Dr. Andrew Adesman, chief of developmental and behavioral studies at Cohen Children's Medical Center. Texting drivers are four times slower to hit the brakes than those impaired by alcohol. He pointed out that a texting driver is distracted from the movement of traffic and even the functions of their own vehicle. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports that at any given moment across the United States, approximately 660,000 drivers are using cell phones or using electronic devices while driving. Researchers at Cohen Children’s Medical Center calculate more than 3,000 teen deaths every year nationwide from texting and about 300,000 injuries. In the last few years texting while driving has increased dramatically. "50% of high school students admit to texting and driving”, said Adesman. Studies show that texting and driving increases with age. A surprisingly low 24% of 15-year-olds claim to send texts while driving, compared to 58% of 18-year-olds. Overall, statistics show that if you are communicating by a text while driving you are 23 times more likely to be in a
These norms are not only life-threatening to the driver and his or her passengers, but also to others sharing the road. In fact, many studies show that a person talking on the cell phone is just as likely to crash as a person who has a blood alcohol concentration of .08% (Moser). Even worse, a person who is texting and driving is 60 times more likely to crash (Moser). Too many people put their lives and the lives of others at risk when they make the careless decision to text or drink and drive. Approximately 18,000 people in the United States die as a result of drunk driving (Moser).
There are many effects on a person’s health and wellbeing through texting and driving, one of these effects is that the person could seriously injure themselves or other people around them, this could then lead to the person developing life limiting injuries, this could then affect the person in many ways one of these ways is that the person could miss out on opportunities. For example, they may not be able to play with their children or maintain a income. Another effect of texting while driving is that the person is at risk of causing themselves a brain damage There are many effects of texting while driving, one of these effects is that a person could start to feel guilty; this will affect the person as it could cause them to have mental ill health and lead to depression. This will affect the person as they could them as they could then become withdrawn from family and friends, this could then cause the person to become addicted to drugs or alcohol to cope with the feeling of guilt and having to live with what they have done. An addiction is when a person becomes reliant on something to cope with their life.
More than 3,000 teens die each year in Canada in crashes caused by texting while driving In 2012 driver distraction was the cause of 18 percent of all fatal crashes Text messaging creates a crash risk 23 times worse than driving while not distracted. the statistics above are from: http://distracteddriving.caa.ca/education/
In a recent interview, a police officer stated “It’s hard to pull someone over for texting and driving. You have to catch them when they are doing it.” In the past month zero tickets have been given for texting while driving however multiple wrecks have been recorded caused by distracted driving. Driver inattention is one of the most common causes of car crashes in Oklahoma and across the country. The governor stated that about 700 Oklahoma car accidents, 30 of which were fatal, have involved a motorist who was either sending or reading a text message.
Three of the high risk behaviors account for texting and driving including “eyes off of the road, at least one hand off the wheel, and mind off the driving situation” (Hollister, 2013). The three actions a person partakes in while texting and driving fall into the three major categories the Center for Disease Control established. Once people begin texting and driving, they no longer pay attention to their driving and only their phone or tablet. Distracted driving takes away the reaction time of a driver from avoiding a crash. Comprehending danger while driving takes multiple seconds.
Magdalena Perez English 106 Mr. Skyler Meek June 10, 2015/ Up dated June 27, 2015 Cell phones while driving According to NSC's website, there have been an estimated 245,358 car crashes involving drivers using cellphones so far this year. One effect cellphone use has on drivers is an increased reaction time, which is similar regardless of handheld or hands-free phone use. Every year many lives are lost because of the distraction on the road and for this reason use of cell phones while driving should be illegal in all of the states. The National Safety Council's annual injury and fatality report, "Injury Facts," found that the use of cellphones causes 26% of the nation's car accidents, a modest increase from the previous year.
Do you ever text while driving? Is it really worth it? II. Credibility Statement: I researched and found stories of information about teens and adults getting killed using cell phones without looking on the road. I have a lot against people who take their eyes off the road just for a text that’s not emergences or important.
(Dreschel, 2014) b. Texting while driving not only threatens your life, but also everyone else on the road. c. (Statistic) Eleven percent of drivers aged 18 to 20 who were involved in an automobile accident and survived admitted, they were sending or receiving texts when they crashed. (Smith, 2014) d. (Fact) (statistic) Nearly half of US high school students aged ≥16 years old report texting while driving during the past 30 days. (O'Malley, 2013) e. (Fact)
In total, harm caused towards an individual is immoral and deserves to be punished by the law. I believe Mill’s objection of majoritarian interference is correct because otherwise, minority groups would have their freedoms infringed upon. For example, until recently, gay marriage was banned federally in the United States. The majority of Americans opposed gay marriage during this time as well. This majoritarian interference diminished the LGBTQ community’s freedom to marry.
The thesis for J.S. Mill, On Liberty is whether we should be able to act upon our opinions. According to Mill, we need to be able to have opinions and express them without being held back. To act on those opinions, is another point, our actions are not as free as our opinions. Our opinions shouldn’t infringe on others, but if they do not get in the way, you should be allowed to practice at your own risk.
As you may or may not have noticed, the issue of texting or utilizing a mobile device while driving has radically growing over the past few years. It was not until I, myself, became a victim of a crash due to a distracted driver that I noticed how much of a danger a person using the phone while behind the wheel can be. For years we have worried about drunk
Mill’s On Liberty defends the Harm Principle in so much as Mill believes in its importance. He strongly believes that a person should be free to do what he or she pleases. Mill understands this could lead to concerning implications, so as a result, Mill addresses concerns and states that a person to act in so far as it does not harm another individual (others). This essay will explore the concepts of harm principle, common good and show how the common good is a formula for maximizing individualism.
The second branch of Mill’s argument is that another harmful outcome of limiting free speech to society is dead dogma. Mill asserts that “the dogma becoming a mere formal profession, inefficacious for good, but cumbering the ground, and preventing the growth of any real and heartfelt conviction, from reason or personal experience,” (Mill 50). Dead dogma is when a belief has been accepted as a truth by majority of a community to where the discussion of its validity ceases. Without continuous discussion and opposing opinions, meanings will be lost and the reasoning behind our judgements get forgotten. In addition, that accepted belief or truth becomes stagnant and does not develop
No text message is worth risking the lives of yourself or others on the road. Texting and driving should be illegal, considering that it is the cause of many fatal car accidents. Unlike driving while under the influence, this epidemic spawns all ages. An example of this would be a horrific incident in which a teen driver ignored her friends’ pleas to stop texting and driving. While distracted
Kids watch parents, parents watch parents and drivers watch drivers. A recent survey stated , 75% of teens say their friends text and drive and 77% say their parents text and drive. When people see other people texting, they might think it is okay to text and drive. Texting while driving is clearly dangerous for several reasons.