Neolithic Era This Neolithic Era was a much easier era for the people in it than the Paleolithic Era. These people had a much easier time finding food, which meant they had a higher surplus of it. They had an easier time mostly because they learned to farm and grow crops instead of always going to hunt. They could grow crops because the earth was more warm and green with more vegetation and animals because The Great Thaw happened in between the Paleolithic and Neolithic Era. They also learned to domesticate animals to use for farming and meat.
Mesopotamia was a successful civilization because of it 's farming. I know this beause If they weren 't successful in farming, they couldn 't build up theire civilization. The text stated that the two rivers would bring in silt, which made rich farming land. This in turn, made them need less farmers, so people got other jobs. The text says they built temples and started trading with other villages.
The Spanish, by nature, couldn’t help but become greedy monsters for gold, because in Europe riches were equivalent to power. They could care less about how the Native Americans acquired the gold; all that mattered was that they had it, and the Spanish could take it. These differences in detail are just fragments of the overall beliefs both groups shared, which were barbarianism and inhumanity. Therefore these differences are far less significant than the
Kamehameha was an effective leader because he made a better life for his people. The sandalwood trade brought him more resources the pacific northwest and hawaii such as iron, salt,nails,weapons and food. This example changed because the sandalwood trade came after unification. This example was good because kamehameha was able to get resources and get off places from far unification.
A Tribe known as the Apache didn 't live in a great area for farming but had other benefits like trading. The geography of the land greatly effects the development of a civilization. The early civilizations lacked the expertise and knowledge of how to make their civilization grow and expand. These civilizations didn 't know how to create large irrigation
One which contains less poverty and more opportunities. These individuals were eager to take advantage of the land being sold by the U.S. government at conveniently low prices. The abundant migration of settlers began to benefit this area in many ways. For starters, migration allowed the already existing industries to begin to thrive. The leading industries
While also providing an easier way of communicating to distanced territories more fluid. The innovation of aqueducts allowed the common folks of Rome accessibility to the use of water more conveniently from inner cities to rural farmers. This was a very impactful innovation for the growth of not only the expansion of people away from the major central Roman cities, but also provided greater prosperity to the poor folks who had trouble accessing resources of water to support themselves. They now had easier ways of retrieving the necessary materials to better their livelihood. The third and arguably the most significant impact that the Pax Romana had on the Empire was the advancement in architecture.
They had more produce and access to goods that were scarce in other areas around them, so they had an advantage in trade. The agricultural surplus gave the Babylonians stability in their economy, which also made their empire stable (Bible History). They traded their agriculture for raw materials because that was rare in the Babylonian Empire (Albright, Paragraph 23). These raw materials were needed for daily life and used in the flourishing textile business. The raw materials were also used to create cabinet-making, gem-cutting, and metal-working industries in the empire that created jobs for the people (Bible History).
Not only does this decrease the cost and damage in fertilizing the crops due to the genetic increase of nitrogen, but it also decreases the price for consumers while increasing farmers income as well. It has always been said that quality is better than quantity, but in order to make food and crops durable, scientists have found that genetic engineering serves a great purpose for that. For example, some genetically modified plants withhold genes that are prevented and protected from viruses. Healthy crops can be just as scarce
With all of the North’s advances in technology and travel it made it easier for them to sell finished goods. The North would get the raw material from the South and turn it into finished goods. In doing this they made good money. Even with making good money the North still only gave the South little amounts. The South got mad because they wanted more money and thought they deserved more money because they are the ones who are giving the North the product.
This Neolithic Revolution was needed for the progression of human life. Changing to an agrarian based lifestyle created a larger population, an increase in food production, and a stable living environment. Humans transitioned from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to an agrarian based settlement around 1000-9000 B.C. A sufficient amount of water is all it takes to sustain the hunter-gatherer way of life (McGee, 1895, 351). Even though the hunter-gatherer lifestyle was healthier for them, the farming lifestyle was more beneficial to them in the long run.
The locavore movement is a new trending movement trying to get people to start eating the local produce provided by the local farmers. The movement has many health benefits, and it is a very healthy choice not only for the human body but it also is good for the local community. The locavore movement should be supported due to its influence on the local communities by helping the local economy, bringing in food that has a better nutritional value, strengthening communities worldwide, along with the fact that the locavore movement is helping create producer/consumer relationships. Eating produce that was grown locally generates more income for the local economy, “According to a study by the New Economics Foundation in London, a dollar spent locally generates twice as much income for the local economy.” (Maiser). Purchasing food that was grown locally to the consumer puts more money into the local economy.