Miranda cautions are a high point of dispute in the law enforcement scene. There are many misunderstandings as to when "Miranda" applies. First, I explain about Miranda rights to their family because it’s important to know these basics. If we aren’t in police care then we don’t have to give them Miranda warnings. We mention all the matter in front of boy’s family and asked the officer that when police officers question a suspect in custody without first giving the Miranda warning, any statement or confession made is supposed to be instinctive, and cannot be used against the suspicious in any criminal case.
The rules that officers must do to arrest a suspect are designed to protect their physical safety and also to avoid making a legal mistake that can lead to ruining the prosecution 's trial case. During the time of the arrest the cops are to read out the suspects Miranda rights. The Miranda rights were done in the U.S. supreme court ruling Miranda v. Arizona which set the rights to remain silent, and anything that you say can be used against you in a court of law etc (Miranda rights). Police Officers violate people 's rights by unreasonable searches through their houses or pulling them over. In a matter of fact, they have to have a reason why they stopped you and need a warrant issued for searching you.
A MOU maybe signed or may not. After the meeting, the case is reported to the police. The possible outcome of this scenario would be similar to scenario 2. Scenario 4 Disregarding the mediation result and ignoring the party statement. The possible outcome of this scenario maybe that, if the mediator is so meticulous and calculated, no potential consequence could be caused In other case, if the party get caught by the police and finally found guilty and imprisoned, the respective party might reveal to the court about why the mediation process.
The principal problems arising in that part of the criminal process which governs events before trial relate to the nature of police powers and procedure in the investigation of offences. The Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 confers wide powers upon our police of making arrests. In addition to the power of arrest, the code bestows upon the police powers parallel to the magistrate to release and arrest person on bail. I. When Police may arrest without warrant U/s 41 Cr.PC.
If a local street gang would steal our purchase, that is illegal, and we can expect that the police will try to recover our property and return it to us. If some level of the government tried to take our house away from us for whatever reason, they are prohibited--except by “due process of law”. This idea of protecting property rights from being taken without “due process” is an inheritance we received from the Magna Carta. In 1215 the particulars of how the government took people’s possessions was different than today, but the basic principle is the same. If we should decide to stand up for our rights, we would consult the laws written down about our situation.
For instance, as much information as possible should be retained for legal purposes. Also, they are not required to counterattack in case of external intrusion unless necessary. An attack could result in the company losing vital information that could have been used to track down the perpetrators or in a lawsuit (Ahmad, Hadgkiss, & Ruighaver, 2012). Instead of attacking, the group will try to get rid of the danger without alerting the intruder. Also, suspicious data will be logged for future reference.
Introduction: The civilized society from the time immemorial devised various methods of punishment to control and record the increasing crime rate and one among them is Criminal Justice System, which comprises of Police, prosecution, presiding officer and others. It is a matter of fact that whenever a crime is committed, the judicial process can’t come into action unless someone reports the incident. It is true that police is the first agency in the Criminal Justice System and is expected to extend protection to every individual and take the cognizance of a crime, whenever committed in their jurisdiction. Moreover, police is not an angle to know about each and every incident which takes place in their jurisdiction. People have an onerous responsibility to report whenever any criminal act is committed in their area and the police is expected to swing into action without losing any time.
Prior to the walk-through, the investigator must stop and scrutinize the area as a whole, making notes of everything possible before going into the actual crime scene to conduct a more detailed assessment. The purpose of this procedure is to
They took the job to protect and serve not to cheat the civilians. Who are they to be taking it out on us, when the majority of us have not done anything wrong? For the sake of our people, I consider that we should force policemen to wear body cameras. This will preclude violence, for they know that they are going to be seen on camera. Aside from that, we will see both sides of the story, the policemen, and the civilian.
1.1 INTRODUCTION In modern day, vehicles anti-theft system is our prime important duty to secure our vehicle by the means of fingerprinting. The main focus while developing the vehicle anti-theft system is to protect our system from theft by providing the anti-theft protection. For the protection, first we should restrict the unlocking of vehicle, only to the authorized persons have this ability to unlock the car without the use of keys, once it has identified by the Fingerprint sensor. The Fingerprint of the owner and other authorized persons are stored into the database beforehand and at the time of starting engine of the vehicle, scanned fingerprints are being crosschecked with the database. Once the data has been crosschecked with the database than the person is authentic to use the vehicle.