Ara Anderson
Elyse Grossman
English 8, Hour X1
2 February 2022
Power and Privlige
Dashka Slater’s impartial nonfiction “The 57 Bus” illustrates how the justice system’s stereotypes and bias can affect how someone's life will turn out. The 57 bus is the real-life story of 2 teenagers and how their lives crossed and changed forever that afternoon in 2013. The teens are Richard a 16-year-old African American who was raised in east Oakland and Sasha an 18-year-old agender senior raised in the foothills of Oakland with their parents Debbie and Karl. It follows the story of Richard lighting Sasha’s skirt on fire and the repercussions with the teens' families and the justice system after the incident. Slater's purpose for writing The 57 Bus is
…show more content…
For example, the families are offered restorative justice as an option; however, the district attorney’s office state this will not affect the time Richard will be serving, but “The truth was, the legal system had its own unassailable logic, a logic that couldn’t be shifted” (243). Neither Richard's family nor Sasha's family has the power to change the course of Richard's sentence. The only people with control are the court and they have a biased view against Richard and his case; they only saw him as a criminal who can not change when in reality he was a juvenile who wanted to change. Also, Darris Young, an organizer whose goal is to keep juveniles out of adult prisons says in an interview, “Why are we sending kids to prison for things that maybe they should have gotten corrected in their lives?” (234). Sending a juvenile to adult prisons won’t necessarily help solve their wrongdoings but they may be influenced by older offenders and never be able to change for the better. Richard may have never been able to get out of jail if he had been strongly influenced by older offenders even with the possibility of parole. The courts have a bias against Richard that can not be shifted even with Sasha’s family's endorsement. They control how Richard’s life will turn out while trying to solve a mistake they had the possibility of making another …show more content…
“School started again. Sasha was accepted into MIT. By February life had slipped back into normality” (223). At this point Sasha’s life was returning to normal with a few exceptions; however, Richards was nowhere near normal, he was in hearings and back in juvie. Richard has no normalcy, he didn’t know if he will be on trial, still in juvie, or in an adult prison within that same month. Sasha has their life planned and knows, if everything goes smoothly, what they will be doing. For instance, the attorney’s office offers Richard a plea bargain after almost a year of back and forth. Debbie states, “I'm a little frustrated…I just want it to be done with” (254). At that point, everyone was tired of how long the sentencing had stretched out. Sasha has left for MIT but Richard was still in juvenile detention even after almost a year since the fire. While Sasha left for college and life became normal again for them Richard still has no normalcy. He and his family wouldn't know where he will end up which adds another level of uncertainty in their
The 57 Bus by Dashka Slater is compelling nonfiction following a real story about two teenagers who faced the consequences of a life-altering crime. In 2013, an assault, considerably a hate crime, took place on a city bus in Oakland, California involving an agender teen, Sasha, and a black teenager, Richard. With ample detail, Slater describes the lifestyles of both characters, such as how Richard didn’t grow up in the best environment but was still a good person. Sasha, on the other hand, was constantly surrounded by supportive people; they were named Luke at birth, but decided it didn't apply to them correctly and identified as agender. While riding home on the bus, Sasha falls asleep and Richard, not intending the harm that occurred, lit
The book, The 57 bus by Dashka Slater is about two high school students who had a very important event happened in their lives. Sasha is an agender person which means they identify as neither a male nor a female. Richard is a young African American male who had some trouble in his school life. Sasha and Richard's lives both changed after an incident involving a bus, a skirt, and a lighter. Sasha is an important person to many LGBTQ+ people and what Richard, has done, will probably show as a reason to support them more.
Humor is part of everyone’s personality. Anyone can crack a joke or pull a prank to make someone laugh, but what happens when the joke goes too far? Who stands up for you when a prank ends up hurting instead of helping? Dashka Slater's 57 Bus explores what happens when what was supposed to be a funny prank turns into hospital rooms and court hearings. This book follows Richard, a black teen who is called "the funny one" by his friends and lives in east Oakland battling racism and poverty, and Sasha, a non-binary teen, as they struggle with their gender expression.
There are many restrictions in society that bind us to certain categories. Whether it be male vs female, rich vs poor, good vs bad, or child vs adult, these categories determine who we are. The 57 Bus is a book about breaking free from these restrictions. Sasha, a white teen living in the better parts of Oakland, is trying to figure out their gender and who they are in the world. Richard, a black teen living in the parts of Oakland more ridden by violence, has completely different circumstances, trying to figure out the spectrum of good and bad and where he belongs on it.
Within another case Stevenson says, “I decided to take on the case. We got Charlie’s case transferred to juvenile offense. That meant that Charlie wouldn’t be sent to an adult prison, and he would likely get out before he turned eighteen” (103), this may not seem like the biggest win to some, but this allowed for a child who had been thrown a lot to have a life away from what he had done as well as what happened to
“And then at a party for the Wake Forest group, I met Ruth Bader Ginsburg”, shares Liam Sherman a freshman at R.J. Reynolds High School. In the summer of 2012, Liam Sherman and his family traveled to Austria for his mother, , a professor of Property Law at Wake Forest University to teach in an exchange program through the university. Towards the end of the summer, while venturing out of the Austrian flat they had lived in through the summer semester, Liam and his mother attended a lunch for the professors.
He woke up in the middle of the night, sweating profusely and trembling in fear, all because of his interview tomorrow. Alexander was a 25-year old who was valedictorian of his high school, graduated top of his class at Stanford University, and now studying law at Columbia University. Despite all his great achievements, he believed that his life was just about to begin. The difference between him and regular law students is that in his short span of life, he experienced great pains due to his parents. His parents didn't care for him and kicked him out at age 18, which caused Alexander to appreciate everything given to him.
An individual's morals and beliefs are developed with age through all the experiences one will encounter in their lifetime, though they can be pushed aside when the need to conform with the majority is more prominent. Authenticity is integral to living an honest life and making good decisions. However, individuality becomes difficult to maintain with pressure from others. Because of this, the need to maintain balance between authenticity to one's principles and ethics and conforming to the majority's standard is prevalent in the human race. In the novel ‘The 57 Bus’ author Dashka Slater tells the true story of two teenagers who encounter a crime on the bus as the victim, Sasha, and the perpetrator, Richard.
Not only does Berstein call for an overall reform of this nation’s juvenile prisons, she goes as far as saying the practice of locking up youth is in need of a “more profound than incremental and partial reform” (13). The fact that Bernstein outlines the numerous failed strategies and goals of this practice with her compelling use of studies and statistics is enough to promote an audience to reject the practice of locking up youth. The statistic she shares that “four out of five juvenile parolees [will be] back behind bars within three years of release” as well as the studies she conducted on numerous instances when a guards abuse of power lead to the death of a child work to further prove her point: being that “institution[s] as intrinsically destructive as the juvenile prison” have no place in a modern society (13, 83). Bernstein refutes this false sense effectiveness further by sharing her own ideas on what she believes works as a much more humane solution to rehabilitating
The article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” argues that children in prison need to be given a chance to mature and be rehabilitated (Garinger 9). Because these killers likely committed these crimes on impulse, they would often realize after the fact that they were wrong to do such an action. Therefore, when they are released, they will be more careful and think about their actions before committing. If they are given a life sentence, they will never be given this chance to fix their life. Older people who commit murders are less likely to learn from their mistakes since they put more thought into the killing than adolescents
The incident left Sasha with severe burns and caused outrage and concern about the safety of the Oakland community. The case raised questions about whether Richard should be charged as an adult or juvenile. But throughout the story, it shows how Richard
After lighting Sasha on fire, he rethinks his decision and his life choices. While on trial, after rethinking her decision, Sasha wants Richard to succeed in life. After being sentenced to jail Richards starts to exceed in finding a job and becomes a highly ranked inmate. He starts to forget his past and thinks about his future. Before meeting Richard,
When teen felons choose to act without thinking, they are putting other people’s lives at risk. They need to be charged as adults because the victims of the crimes will not be given the justice they deserve when they have to worry about that criminal harming them again. Although some people think that sending a juvenile through adult court gives them no hope, they should have given this a little thought before committing the crime. Teens need to think about the consequences and how their actions affect others before they act. When choosing between putting a violent adolescent in prison and taking the chance of letting them commit that crime again, it is most suitable to let the teen be tried as an adult and to place them in prison.
There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow
Can you imagine waking up behind closed walls and bars? Waking up to see your inmate who is a 45-year-old bank robber and you are a 14-year-old minor who made a big mistake. This is why minors who have committed crimes should not be treated the same as adults. Some reasons are because the consequences given to minors in adult court would impact a minor’s life in a negative way. If a minor is tried through a juvenile court, they have a greater chance of rehabilitation.