II. THE ADR MOVEMENT IN KUWAIT It is unfair to compare the ADR movement in Kuwait with the U.S. for many reasons. First, Kuwait as an official country is relatively new. Kuwait was "An Independent Country Under British Protection," according to an agreement between Lieut. Colonel M.J. Meade, the Political Resident in the Arabian Gulf and Sheikh Mubarak Al-Sabah, Ruler of Kuwait signed January 23, 1899. In 1950, the ruler of Kuwait became Sheikh Abdullah Al-Salem Al-Sabah, who realized that the protectorate agreement was no longer appropriate after the changes that had taken place in the circumstances of Kuwait and the region; moreover, the Arab nationalism movement during that time led to the Declaration of Independence of Kuwait on June …show more content…
The judicial power was divided between two jurisdiction's authorities. The British High Commissioner exercised his jurisdiction over British and foreign cases, even if one of the parties involved in the case was a Kuwaiti citizen. And, the Kuwaiti courts, which were formed as the Main Sharia Court, exercised its jurisdiction over criminal, commercial, and civil cases, Personal Statute and Family Courts (one for Sunni Muslims and another for Shiites), and a Court for Minor Crimes. In the movement toward independence and self-governance, Kuwait enacted many laws before the declaration of independence. One of those laws was the Judiciary Act of 1959. This was the first modern act in Kuwait regulating dispute resolution, or, for that matter, any ADR forms whatsoever. It also contained in Article 39 the very first piece of legislation that regulated arbitration as an ADR tool. Unfortunately, from 1959 until now, much legislation has been enacted to regulate dispute resolution in Kuwait, but none of it has regulated or recognized mediation as a form of ADR. Litigation still constitutes the focus of the bulk of this legislation, though some parts utilize arbitration. Mediation never became an option for disputants in …show more content…
Kuwait as an Arab country was influenced by Islamic culture throughout history. This influence began when a lot of "Arab Tribes" started to convert to Islam, which promotes peaceful methods such as mediation for resolving disputes. This mindset encouraged existing Arab tribes to use non-violent approaches to resolve their disputes, rather than the violent methods they were accustomed to. Also, the Kuwaiti legal system, by law, does not prohibit settlement out of courts, but there is no legal process or protection for those who choose to settle outside of
The Arab peninsula was under control of the Ottoman Turks. During WW1 in the time period of 1914-1918 it allowed Arab tribes to fight against the Turks. The Arabs fought on the side of the Allies. Arabs hoped to be freed from Turkish control and gain independence, TE Lawrence went to speak to Arab tribes to gain their support for WWI. France and Great Britain planned on taking Arab states as colonies.
The legal system does not follow a precedent instead it deals with each case on the individual level. It
However the high court have all the rights and power to reconsider common law which was exactly the case in this situation. The role of
Mediation is typically a neutral third party that is brought in to help the parties resolve their dispute. The goal of mediation is to clear up misunderstandings, determine concerns, find areas of agreement, and incorporate those areas into solutions. Although a mediator has no decision-making power, they can often help cases resolve more peacefully. The legal system often does this because it helps find solutions faster without there being a lot of tension between the Canadian legal system and society. Overall this allows for a better relationship and allows for the legal system to address the needs of society in a just
Vin Signorile HS 102-01 Fall 2015 October 23, 2015 E-Campus Feisal, Arab King, Appeals to Power Demand Freedom of Syria and Lebanon-Anti-British Agitation in Mesopotamia This is a short article that starts off talking about how the representatives of King Feisal are announcing the independence Syria and Lebanon. They also announced they are protesting against the French occupation. A note states that the Syrians are able to govern themselves. The Arab population always seems to be in rebellion, so the independence is just what they need.
The Middle East underwent many changes yet some continuities between 600 to 1450 c.e.. The Middle East during the time of 600 c.e. was the first spread and start of Islam which stated a change reaction for the religion, but it also started a new type of rule from controlling city- states to caliphs. The economy also changed from using agriculture only in the Middle East to trading through the Indian Ocean. The Middle East in the 600 to 1450 c.e. changed from their ruling tactics, the continuity of their religion, Arabic language, and women’s rights, and their trade. In the 600c.e the Middle East use to be ruled by controlling citr- states which controlled the city and surrounding areas.
“This is the right thing to do for myself and my country.” Soon after the signing of the Declaration the king released a statement to the representatives stating that so called colonies had declared independence. As he spoke he said that in a foolish attempt to gain independence we had inevitably doomed ourselves. However, our spirit as a country will forever keep us
Mediation is where the two parties aim to reach a mutual resolution on the dispute with the help of a mediator. Mediation is helpful when both parties want to come to a decision without going to court as they settle the dispute themselves. Mediation does not decide on the dispute it leaves control of the outcome with the parties. Arbitration is a formal way of resolving disputes, it's set up so opposing parties present their cases to an independent third person. The arbitrator makes a decision based on hearing the case and the evidence presented to them.
The Gulf War- A Realist Perspective Introduction Persian Gulf War, also called Gulf War (1990–91), was an international conflict that was triggered by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990. Iraq’s leader, Saddam Hussein, ordered the invasion and occupation of Kuwait with the apparent aim of • acquiring that nation’s large oil reserves, • canceling a large debt Iraq owed Kuwait, • and expanding Iraqi power in the region. If Saddam were successful in capturing Kuwait, he would be considered the Supreme Leader of the Oil rich area. But it was not only a question of oil; territory was another relevant issue in Saddam’s agenda. He wanted to gain access of an old disputed territory, Kuwait.
The use of ECHR or European Convention on Human Rights in British courts before it was being incorporated into United Kingdom law is an example. UK and any other country which relies to the power of legislation, should always if possible do not conflicts with the international law. Therefore the supremacy of both laws depends on the acceptance if the municipal courts to the international law
The Arab World Different people around the world have different standards and personalities. The same thing applies to different cultures in which every culture has its own way in dealing with things. An example of totally two different cultures is the Western culture and the Arab culture. Many differences can be easily recognized between these two different cultures. An author named Edward T. Hall wrote an article that shows how these two cultures behave differently under the same conditions.
The hierarchy of courts of Malaysia begins with the Magistrates’ Court, followed by the Sessions Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and finally is the Federal Court of Malaysia. There are generally two types of trials, criminal and civil. The jurisdiction of the courts in civil or criminal matters are contained in the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 and the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Article 121 of the Constitution provides for two High Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, the High Court in Malaya, and the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak. Thus this creates two separate local jurisdiction of the courts – for Peninsular Malaysia and for East Malaysia.
These are applied by the procedure to enhance the cause of conflict resolution; f) Mediation is a voluntary type of conflict management. This defines the challengers in an intractable issue, select whether to start or prolong mediation or not, and they keep their command over the result of their issue, with their autonomy to accept or refuse any elements of the procedure or the final contract, g) Mediation performs only on an ad hoc basis. Once completed, a mediator departs the field of the conflict. Third party mediation is not confined to mediation by superpower states, such as the United States or Russia. Mediation efforts by small and medium size powers are sometimes a good option (e.g. the Algerian mediation between the US and Iran regarding the American hostages).
For instance, in the case of Ainan Bin Mahamud v Syed Abu Bakar Bin Habib Yusoff , the court held that Section 112 of Evidence Enactment 1950 was a statute which was implemented to all people whether they are Muslims or non-Muslims. Thus, by virtue of this provision, a child was born by a womanless than six months after the marriage was a legitimate child even though according to Islamic law, the said child is considered to be an illegitimate child. In this case, it had been proven that the Evidence Enactment prevailed over Islamic Law even though it has been mentioned as the religion of federation and Civil court has the jurisdiction to hear the
In the said case, the counsel for the appellants tried to argue before the Court of Appeal that the decision in the case Rama Chandran v The Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor was wrong. Because the court was heard in the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal disagreed. It was also