Egalitarianism is defined as the doctrine that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities. Throughout history many have formed opinions on the factors that are determined through birth, ultimately shaping the way privilege is understood both intrinsically and extrinsically. Many argue that this valuing of equality has effects on other inherent qualities of a person’s life—such as happiness.
An individual’s happiness is one of the many things that are unique to them, conjunctly as are the factors that make up what makes them happy. This intrinsic feeling has been studied, quantified—even simplified to an equation to help understand exactly what affects arguably one of the most important factors of life. Increasingly enough,
…show more content…
It is my belief that a person’s happiness is directly linked to how they understand their relationship with both society and self—which are mutually affected by egalitarianism. Using the data from the General Social Survey, a national survey that seeks to “monitor and explain trends and constants in attitudes, behaviors, and attributes”, I will test the relationship of these two variables, as well as control for factors such as race and …show more content…
Many political scientists seek to show the relationship from either a moral or psychological understanding rather than that of a statistical approach. In a recent article published in the Journal of Happiness Studies called Happiness, Morality, and Politics, this issue of egalitarianism and happiness is commented on by stating “the idea that politics should promote the happiness of the population is rather common in the community of happiness researchers. This political view is sometimes based on the happiness principle, the fundamental ethical view that we have a strong moral reason to do what we can to maximize the happiness and minimize the suffering in the world.” The article wanted to link the duties of the government to happiness among citizens. In this regard, understanding how politics intersects with more inherent qualities of life is a fundamental necessity rather than just mindless
In his article "In Pursuit of Happiness: Better Living from Plato to Prozac," Mark Kingwell describes how there has been many debates on the meaning of happiness for many years yet still a singular, justifiable definition eludes society. The pursuit to define and understand happiness has invited several debates, questions, arguments, and suggestions alike. In 1996, a hand full of genetic and behavioral studies suggest evidence that one’s achievable degree of happiness is genetically decided, with evidences showing that no achievement will change your happiness, you are either happy or you’re not. Some studies demonstrated a correlation between dopamine levels in the brain and expressions of personal satisfaction, while others indicated that
“And if we listen nice, Mr.Montag will be happy and then maybe we can go on and do something else” (Bradbury 95). Society trusts the government’s judgment on happiness. They do not permit themselves to think on their own. Society themselves create
Equality lives in a collectivist society, which is a society that believes, “that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called “the common good.” Therefore, Equality being the person he is, struggles with being an individual. He knows it is against the law but he enjoys knowledge so much, it confuses him. He states, “And in our heart-strange are the ways of evil! - and in our heart there is the first peace we have known in 20 years.”
One of the main aspects of the “American Dream” that people tend to want aside from money, is to be happy. However, there is no set definition on what happiness is or what it means to be happy. Throughout the documentary, Happy, Roko Belic (2011) addresses various countries that are perceived as the “least happy” or “happiest.” With the use of various family interviews, Belic emphasize the various meanings of “happy” as they pertain to the “least happy” or “happiest” countries.
Equality is something people want till people actually have it. Equality often limits a person’s abilities and disables to do something for themselves or inspire themselves. Equality's, the main character in the book Anthem, the primary motivation is proving that he is smart enough to become a scholar. Equality has a right to be motivated in this way since he believes that he can help the society so he is giving into the collectivism. I think that if everyone was motivated in this way, there would be a more progressive society where people sought to improve themselves and society at the same time.
Equality’s beliefs on happiness - “It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose” (95) - is correct. This is because the Council tries to eradicate human nature and replace it with a basic persona for everyone, which results in a limited mindset that does not allow them to see a logical point of view nor achieve happiness.
Synthesis Essay Equality is the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, and opportunities. Therefore we as people deserve equality in status, rights,and in opportunity. Sadly this is hardly portrayed in today 's society. Yet we were promised these things in the american promise.
In the City, it was forbidden not to be happy (45). Now there is a major flaw in this. Having so many emotions is what creates the core of humans. It could be thought that humans would not be as productive without the ability of feelings. Now, the most likely situation is that Equality never touches this subject.
Happiness is a rite of passage to everyone no matter what cost. It can be extremely difficult to take someone’s happiness away, but it can be done. For example, in the book “Anthem” by Ayn Rand, Prometheus’ happiness is stripped from him in a futuristic society focused around similarity and compliance. Similarly, this unfortunately can happen as we are currently witnessing in Communist countries. Rand describes taking away individuality by forcing everyone to use “we” instead of “I”.
All people are given the numbing safety of having no talents, no favoritism, and no ego. “Preach Selflessness. Tell a man that he must live for others. ”(The Soul of a Collectivist) By being one and the same, everyone is promised a sense of equality, something mankind fights over relentlessly.
There's so much emphasis on putting others before oneself that people often forget to look out for their own needs, as shown in this book. Ayn Rand successfully captures the negatives of an overrated ideology and presents an unorthodox perspective on the matter. In conclusion, Equality's true motives behind his work are much more selfish than they first appear to be. Equality strives to fulfil his own personal desire rather than contribute everything to society, and this isn't necessarily a negative thing.
Equality’s curiosity and formation of happiness leads him to pursue knowledge even more. While this brings him happiness
Throughout the course of one’s life, there is a constant search for some form of happiness. We may not always realize we are on the quest for it, but it’s part of human nature. In “Silver Linings Playbook” we see this happen throughout with Pat and Tiffany, who are both searching for happiness. The film is relatable to us all in that many times we go looking for happiness only to come up empty-handed.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the concept of happiness is introduced as the ultimate good one can achieve in life as well as the ultimate goal of human existence. As Aristotle goes on to further define happiness, one can see that his concept is much different from the 21st-century view. Aristotelian happiness can be achieved through choosing to live the contemplative life, which would naturally encompass moralistic virtue. This differs significantly from the modern view of happiness, which is heavily reliant on material goods. To a person in the 21st-century, happiness is simply an emotional byproduct one experiences as a result of acquiring material goods.
At the end of everyone’s lives, the goal appears to be about attaining happiness. Describing how to obtain happiness has been an issue that was debated in the past but is still talked about now . In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on his view of happiness and he focuses particularly on how reason helps recognize and pursue what will lead to happiness and the good life. I feel that Aristotle’s philosophies on happiness are important works within the field of philosophy and he considered one of the………of it . In this paper, I will explore Aristotle’s beliefs regarding happiness then compare and contrast them to those of Martin Seligman.