The American Paradox Nash Analysis

Although both Llama and Interesting Narrative are two different documents they both have a lot of elements in common. Europeans used both Llama and slavery to get what they wanted to optimize their lifestyles. America was huge land that had nothing before trade. To make America a better place to live, Europeans started to make profit out of farming and increasing population by slavery. To increase the population to work for free, million of Africans were brought to the America to work under horrible conditions.

Before the 16th century, Europeans were not that familiar with slaves trading in the West African Coast but there was African labor used by the Portuguese which were the first to actually use African labor. When slaves began to be transported to America during the triangle trade, it also became known as the Atlantic Slave Trade. The cause of the Atlantic slave trade was mainly shaped by the want for cheap labor as the colonies in America attempted to produce raw goods for Europeans. However, a large amount of labor was needed to create and maintain plantations

Sectionalism Before the 19th century, Americans stuck to their traditional roots and felt no need to try new things or implement new technologies, but that soon changed. In the South, the demand for cotton was at an all time high, but it was a long and difficult process as slaves had to separate the seed and cotton by hand. A man named Eli Whitney saw an opportunity to fix this issue and created the infamous Cotton Gin. The machine worked by inputting the cotton on one side and cranking it as it separates the seeds and cotton with the hassle as the output results in cotton.

The decreasing population confederated with a necessity for a labor might, led colonists to expect that buying African slaves was the most material passage to acquire a drudgery might. The sully was perfect for this browse and tobacco became the main source of proceeds for most of the colonists. To the planter, slavery was the ideal form of labor. The African slaves also had other characteristics that coax colonists to application them as an industry stuff. Tobacco was the major crop of the 17th century in the English colonies.

As a result, slavery became an important part in the southern industry, which also led to the controversy of the slavery issue. Furthermore, the different economic system between the two camps widened the economic gap between the North and the South. While the former enjoyed more economic development and profits, the latter suffered seriously from economic losses. Another factor led the inevitable war was the social difference between the

Slavery is a touch and go topic and everyone has separate opinions on slavery but I don’t think the emergence of the slavery in the English colonies was primarily a response to economics. I feel that it was just pure hate and racism. At this time money wasn’t controlling everything and money wasn’t as important to the world then as it was now. Economics didn’t change once slavery started or ended.

The mass import of slave into the colonies began after the Indian population was killed by disease and the indentured slaves didn’t want to do the hard work of sugar cane. Slavery didn’t grow as fast in North America as it did in Brazil and the West Indies. Slavery began to grew in the early 1700’s when the House of Burgesses pass a new slave code. Slaves became property. They could be sold, brought, leased, fought over in court, and passed to descendents.

During the American colonial period, labor was the main source for economy in many of the colonies. In which slavery was established due to the fact that land owners not willing to pay for their workers and getting easy money without getting their hands dirty. Slavery was used by many owners during the American colonial period. The evolution of slavery got established because of England started to use the Headright-System which meant if you traveled to the “new world” you would get land in return because England population was too overpopulated. In which the headright system lead to Indentured servants.

In the article “Cotton and Slavery”, the main idea was about the South and North America’s Civil war due to the slavery of producing cotton. The North and South’s theory about slavery was different: The North thought it was inhumane of not giving payments to the slaves who deserves, but the South disagreed. Before the Civil war begun, the industry of cotton was the biggest boom. The people earned money by making cotton into clothes or other products.

From the very beginning of the seventeenth century, America depended on slaves for free labor in order to make a considerable profit. These slaves were not treated as normal people though; they were sold into a life of no rights, cruel punishment, and rigorous work schedules. In his autobiography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, freed slave Frederick Douglass shares his personal accounts with slavery in order to reveal the harsh truth slavery hides to the public. Throughout his narrative, Douglass uses specific maritime allusions as well as vivid diction, oxymorons and anaphora to persuade the reader to think more philosophically about oppression and in turn ask the question, ‘what does it truly take to be free?’.

In the upper South, where slaves living in urban communities were more common, this allowed slave owners to make a profit from their extra slaves. Industrialist ran into a problem because they didn 't want the burden of looking after their slave employees outside of the work they were hired for, and they often gave them allowances to pay for their own housing. This allowed slaves in the urban community to live in a diverse area that included blacks that were free, slaves and white people, some of whom might be against slavery (“Slavery in the Civil War Era,”

Approximately three Southern states change their approach on forced labor without compensation, African American slaves would work for an amount of cash that was, generally, given to the masters of the slaves; However, some of these African American were freed and, therefore, kept all the earnings. In the mid 1800’s southern states, slavery was progressively headed towards salary base employment which would boost the states economically. Furthermore, Northern states were already using such economic structure to boost labor in the industrial region, which led to divide the country into sectors of specialized commodities. Southern state were no longer the only major contributor of economic growth, the Northern states were in large in foreign demands for cotton in the years of 1815-1843 as industries boomed in

Colonization involved invading the land, culture, and establishing control over indigenous groups. There were problems with equality some rich and some poor. The most valuable crop for colonies was tobacco and soon tobacco was sent over to Africa. However, a cargo of African Americans were sent to the Spanish colonies. The new English colonies consist of small farms consisting tobacco plantation which lead to slavery.

The Missouri Compromise was a significant turning point in United States history, it lead to many discussions on slaves civil rights, the Dred Scott decision, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. In a sense, the Missouri Compromise impaired the unity of the United States and was the original fuel for the civil war. As states were expanding westward after the Louisiana Purchase, so was the debate of slavery. The North did not rely on slavery because it was unprofitable after the American Revolution.

I find it very interesting that the southern colonies distinguished themselves from the New England colonies so early on. I never realized that the slave trade and the plantation class developed so early in American history and it’s fascinating that these differences eventually became large factors in the outbreak of the Civil War. The South’s cash crops required vast amounts of human labor and slavery was essential for the economic health of the southern colonies. Furthermore, this gives insight to the reason pre-Civil War era southern elites were so adamant that the South remain a slave society.