The Revolution came from them- the middle class. The working classes were incapable of starting or controlling the Revolution. They were just beginning to learn to read.” Although the idea is true considering the low literacy among people in the 18th century, without the support of the working classes, the overthrow of the monarchy cannot be done. Lord Acton suggests that “…the suffering of the people was not greater than they had been before. The ideas of the philosophes were not directly responsible for the outbreak…[but] the spark that changed thought into action was supplied by the Declaration of American Independence.” As supporters of American Independence, Frenchmen are familiar with that “news”.
Evidence that social inequality is responsible for starting the French Revolution is the social condition before the revolution and its impact on the citizens. Privileges were one of the symbols of inequality during the time, the higher classes such as the nobility and the clergy were granted excessive privileges while the commoners on the other hand were given none. One of the famous example of these privileges were taxes, although the monarchy was able to tax the privileged elite before the revolution, the commoners was still burdened by heavy taxes while the clergy are still exempt from paying taxes. Although the clergy and the nobility made up only three percent of the total population, they are the wealthiest classes in the empire thus by the exemption of taxes, it had a big impact on the economy. This combined with the inefficiency of French’s tax system
To be more precise, inequalities in terms of wealth, power, and dignity are the inequalities which spark revolutions. The French Revolution was the beginning of the downfall of the monarchial system of government. The most important cause of the French Revolution was the unfair taxation of the poor class, or the Third Estate. The French society had been divided into three classes, or Estates. The First Estate was the clergy, or the people of the Church.
How to Disprove Propaganda 101 Prior to 1789, France was a country that was an absolute monarchy, and the population was divided up into three parts: the clergymen (also known as the First Estate), the nobility (also known as the second estate), and the Third estate (most of the population). In an absolute monarchy, although he did have advisors, King Louis XVI had absolute say in the law, and he did not have to explain himself to anyone. The problem was, he did not listen to his advisors, which played a part in the royal treasury being depleted. Meanwhile, the peasants were being worked and taxed into exhaustion and poverty, to the point where most of the population was starving. Nevertheless, the nobility continued to spend lavishly while the other 85-97% of the population worked as farmers as they starved (after the revolution started, this time period was known as the Old Order).
This shows people being treated poorly because the third estate is under the taxes but first and second estate are above the taxes, not paying taxes while the third is paying the taxes because they are under them. Next, another example is in document four when it says “...for the suffering of the people was not greater than they had been before.” This means that, the people are not doing very good they are suffering and don 't have the resources to be safe so they continue to suffer. During the French revolution there were many people that were being treated poorly and that was a key factor to the start of the French
Comparison of Methods: Indian Independence Movement and The French Revolution: The French Revolution (1789-1799) and the Indian Independence Movement (1858-1947) were two parts of history that were similar in some ways while different in others. In the French Revolution, the French government was the Old Regime and that divided France into three Estates. The first estate and the second estate accounted for 3% of the French population and were made up of nobles and the clergy. These people had to pay a very small amount of money as income tax and in some cases no money was taxed. The third estate accounted for 97% of the French population and was made up of the bourgeoisie, which were the French middle class and the poor.
Before the French Revolution, people were not being treated fairly. Common rights that we have today such as the rights to fair wages, free education or equality were not there. They were basic human right and the people of France did not have them. France was an absolute monarchy meaning the King ruled over all of his people and made most of the decisions. The people of France were separated into three estates, first the Clergy (The church), then the Nobles and finally the commoners.
That would surely last for no longer, but the French Revolution rose ... The French Revolution is often seen as a bloody anarchic mess, and like many other revolutions, it ended at the end of replacing an authoritarian regime with an authoritarian regime. But even though the revolution was a mess, its ideas changed human history. In the eighteenth century, France was a beautiful and popular country, but society was structured in a way that gave rise to problems for the collection of taxes. They had a system we call "Ancien Régime" This benefited the few Frenchmen, as it meant that the people with money - the generous and priest - should not pay
One of the direct causes of the French Revolution was the incapability of the Royal Treasury in resolving its problems. The fiscal crisis of 1786 worsened the situation since France had been living beyond its means since seventeenth century. The unique features and hostile reactions provoked by the fiscal system of the state during the Ancien Regime were also responsible for the French Revolution. Another major reason for the French Revolution was bankruptcy of the state due to conflicts between the Monarchy and nobility to rule out the tax reforms, which were detrimental to the progress of the state. Furthermore, there had been an increase in social antagonism between the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy.
Both the above things conceivably the significant reasons for substantial volume of Exports, things sold out to remote purchasers to produce incomes from outside the nation. Currently, Pakistan is facing number of problems, which has directly weakened its economic stability and growth rate. This is mainly because of the political instability, high rate of bombers attacks, lack of political leader’s interest, and lastly low production due to expense load shedding which is directly impacting the exports of Pakistan. The main problem is that due to low export rate which has directly affected the economic growth of Pakistan. Similarly, the low production has also resulted in the high import rates for which the consumers of Pakistan have to purchase products at high rate.