ipl-logo

The Anti-Federalists

730 Words3 Pages

The Anti-Federalist’s view of government about having a federal government where the states have more power rather than to have a central government was justified. The Anti-federalists wanted to ensure the protection of individual rights along with allowing the states to have the role of checking and balancing each other. Although their inspiration was the Articles of Confederation, their main goal was to make a few adjustments along with adding a Bill of Rights to secure the citizens’ rights for many generations to come. Federalists, people who supported the Constitution, sided with having a central government. They had the determination to have the Constitution ratified. Important Federalist figures such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison …show more content…

They also believed that the Constitution was enough to ensure the people’s rights and that the Bill of Rights was not needed. Of all the positions they argued, the quote “We may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior” is one of the most agreeable statements. This quote states that the new Constitution should not be compared to the structure of government that the Ancient Romans had. The government should be supported by the voice of the people along with representatives that are elected by the people. Another quote by the federalists, “It is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the …show more content…

The cost of having a strong central government could lead to corruption if something goes wrong. Also, their view of government is flawed due to them not wanting to add the Bill of Rights to make sure that individual rights would be protected. In fact, they were hesitant about adding them due to fearing misinterpretation and restricting a right if it doesn’t appear on the Bill of Rights. Another quote in favor of the Anti-Federalists, “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety”, is reasonable as individual rights are most important when it comes to controlling a

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

433 Words | 2 Pages

The anti-federalist wanted to improve the equality in the government this is clear with this quote "As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety". The anti-federalist believed that the constitution needs the bill of rights to protect people individual rights. The federalist were a strong central government .They wanted a strong leader and they wanted the separation of powers as stated in the federalist quote. "It is evident that each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.

Read More

Comparing Views Of The Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

355 Words | 2 Pages

Federalists and Anti- Federalists had different view points on how they wanted to run their governments. Federalists wanted a strong central government. They wanted the Constitution to be ratified right away, with no changes. Federalists wanted the powers of state to be given central government. They wanted the government to be divided into three branches.

Read More

Anti-Federalists: Founder Of Popular Democracy

83 Words | 1 Pages

The new Constitution, they protested, took too much power away from the states and localities and gave it to the central government. In the long run, they charged, the Constitution would erode the faceto-face participation necessary for a healthy democracy. The Anti-federalists were not a marginal group; many state

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

To What Extent Were The Anti-Federalists Really The Bad Guys

1864 Words | 8 Pages

According to Saul Cornell, the struggle between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist over the constitution is one of the “greatest political struggles in American history”. (Cornell, 2012) From what I gather the men who were called the Anti-Federalist are the real Federalist because they cared about the rights of the people and wanted to protect them from an all-powerful government and give more power to the states to care for their own people. They believed that citizens should be included in decisions and that when they weren’t included into decision making procedures the government would become detached from their citizens. (Borowiak, 2007).

Read More

Assess The Difference Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

543 Words | 3 Pages

They felt that the constitution did not create a fair government, but a controlling government. They were scared that the power of the states would be lost and that the people would lose their rights and freedom. They were scared because some would take over their rights. The Anti- Federalist came together and created the Bill of rights and proposed it to the constitution to make sure the citizens were secure by law. They wanted everyone to be heard, not overruled.

Read More

Assess The Difference Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

537 Words | 3 Pages

In fact, federalists and anti-federalists stood on a totally different ground. Actually, the opposition initially raised from the part of anti-federalists who argued that they could not ratify the Constitution which provided the national government and legislative organs with too much power and decreased the role of local communities. To put it more precisely, they argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the national government at the expanse of the state governments to the extent that the opinion of the local community could be potentially ignored by the central government under certain circumstances.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

417 Words | 2 Pages

During the writing of the Constitution there was a group of people who did not agree with the federalist and they were the anti-federalists. They believed in the exact opposite of what the federalists believed. The federalists believed "that the nation might not survive without the passage of the Constitution"(The Ratification Debate). They argued that the government would only have powers that the Constitution would state. They also argued that the separation of the powers of government would help balance out power and help prevent any tyranny.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

368 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti-Federalists were not in support of the constitution, as they wanted more individual freedoms. The Anti-Federalists supported the Bill of Rights, to encourage personal liberties. The Federalists believed the greatest threat to the US was that democracy led to problems.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

Arguments Against Federalists

347 Words | 2 Pages

Although I agree with some points of the Federalists, I mainly find the Antifederalists’ arguments more persuasive. Regarding the view of ‘The People,’ the Federalists believe that having an authority figure make decisions instead of the mass is more efficient. However, with access to education, people are educated to understand and develop their own choices instead of relying on one person to make the decisions for them. One example are the people voting in the presidential elections. The people choose who they want as the president of the country.

Read More

Difference Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

282 Words | 2 Pages

During the time where you had to choose between federalist vs. anti-federalist, I would support anti-federalism. Anti-federalist vowed to defend lower class against the government, protect state rights, and vowed to make sure the constitution was not being taken advantage of. They believe The Bill of Rights should be used with the constitution. What are federalist you ask? Well, federalist are people that believe in a strong central government and that it is required to be a powerful government,

Read More

The Federalist Party And The Anti-Federal Party

270 Words | 2 Pages

Beyond just believing that the Constitution should be ratified, the Anti-Federalist Party had a broad ideology that they held foremost to their cause. They believed that Congress and the Executive Branch held too much power in the federal government and over the people of the people in the United States. They thought that under the Constitution

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

Differences And Similarities Of The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

276 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists both wanted almost completely different things when it came to the power of the national government. The Federalists believed in the national government having almost all control, while the Anti-Federalists wanted most of the power to be in the hands of the states and people. They both decided on the Bill of Rights, where they decided that the power had to be fairly distributed among the states and people and the national government. The Elastic clause and the General Welfare clause were two features of the original Constitution that led to growth in power of the national government.

Read More

More about The Anti-Federalists

Related Topics

Open Document