It seems that you cannot effect the mind without in turn affecting the brain. This information all suggests that the thing that changes the mind (drugs, learning, etc) is able to change the brain physically. On discussing the linkage between the brain and mind, Hassert says, “Taking note of these everyday occurrences suggests a very tight linkage between the psychological and the biological, a linkage that supports taking both elements seriously in our discussions related to the ethical implications of psychological/behavioral and neurological/biological manipulations” (Hassert 195). The brain can address how something has occurred, but the mind might
Body is composed of cells, skeletons, muscles and blood vessels, thus, it has its own physical shape that can be touched. Contradictorily, mind is a mental constituent of the nature, which is shapeless and non-touchable. It is capable of thought, imagination, understanding and conscience. In this point some may argue that the function of the brain is similar to the function of mind such as thinking, understanding, differentiating. Great philosopher and mathematician Dene Descartes answered to this.
I do not think that is possible. In this paper, I will be defending that physical events within the brain explain the functional parts of consciousness, while also producing the subjective experiences—qualia—as a consequence. I will be defending the property dualist idea of epiphenomenalism. But what is epiphenomenalism in terms of
For example, if someone were to say that I am incorrect and that minds can exist without bodies, then I would like to prove them wrong. First of all, the mind is the element of a person that enables consciousness, perception, thinking, etc. If the mind were to be detached from the body, then the mind could not perceive sensory information like how it normally would in the body. According to Scott Mendelson, M.D., “Sensory experience is a function of the brain and a disembodied mind cannot experience these things” (1). If the mind were to be separated, those individuals would believe that the mind can still perceive sensory information such as sight, smell, hearing, etc.
The one aspect of our mind which is unarguably the most familiar yet the most confusing is the conscious experience of us and the world, and has been puzzling humans since their existence. The solution to this problem of consciousness, and several other related problems arising out of the same probably lies somewhere in the depths of our brains, its structure and function. There have been multiple views and opinions regarding the nature of consciousness and whether or not any substantial basis exists for consciousness, it is central to the notions of thought and personal identity. Some believe that consciousness could not arise from matter alone, as illustrated by Leibniz’s famous analogy of the mill. To illustrate his opinion, he asked his reader to imagine someone walking through an expanded brain as one would walk through a mill and observing all its mechanical operations, which for Leibniz exhausted its physical nature.
I am able to recognize their their mental illness and take it seriously, all while not discriminating the person. I believe if more people can change their behavior to act in a more thoughtful and accepting manner towards people with mental illnesses, then the stigmas will decline. In addition, I have always been taught and believed in the saying, “You never truly know what someone is going through.” This concept and this tunnel has continued to make me more aware of being sensitive and caring to everyone; people I have close relationships with and others who I may only associate with. Likewise, people need to stop seeing mental illnesses in a negative way. Instead, I believe people should look at mental illness in terms of another characteristic that the person encompasses, that makes him or her unique.
Introduction Thomas Szasz begins by asking, does mental health even exist? As mental illness as a notion is widely used these days, it is extremely important to investigate the ways in which it is employed. As mental illness does not have a physical basis; it is as good as other theoretical concepts. But often these theories end up posing as ‘objective truths’ quite like the theories of witches and devils which come up as explanations for a variety of events. According to him, this is what has been happening in today’s world where mental illness is being used to explain away innumerable events.
1. Dualism is an idea that attempts to answer the mind-body problem by arguing that the mind and body are two distinct substances. Descartes’ coherent conception argument is a form of interactionistic dualism, which states that if the mind and body are undoubtedly separate than they interact in a casual relationship. This argument states that anything a person coherently conceives can be made possible by some power. It then states that if a person distinctly understands the mind and body are separate substances than some power can make it such that the mind and body are separate.
Theory of mind represents a persons ability to ‘walk around in someones elses shoes’, or recognise that other people feel and think differently from that person. It affects their ability to understand and empathise with others’ mental states, and to realise that everyone has their own intentions , emotions, likes and dislikes, and beliefs. Sometimes theory of mind is called ‘mindreading’ and in response to that name , researcher , Simon Baron-Cohen called the state of not being able to do this , ‘mindblindness’.Children who have no or limited theory of mind are unable to read peoples minds. They don’t know that the switch of eye contact as someone is speaking to them denotes something. They don’t understand that there are underlying motivations