The Argument Of The Mind-Body Problem

1077 Words5 Pages
Since the beginning of philosophy, the argument of the mind-body problem has been constantly debated. The mind-body problem asks what the connection is between the mind and the body. Many philosophers have come up with their own theories to answer this predicament but each theory that philosophers have come up with has some indication of a flaw. The mind-body problem is a philosophical issue that inquires the relationship among the mental and physical properties. The fundamental point regarding the mind-body problem considers whether perceptions, thoughts, feelings, and other mental features are an extension of physical features or if they remain entirely independent of the physical world. Additionally, there are two major points to the mind-body problem and those are dualism and physicalism. These two points have entirely different views on the mind-body problem and play an essential role in a person’s life. Understanding an individual’s stance on this subject is more important than one thinks. Fundamentally, the mind-body problem can help one understand their life and…show more content…
One popular opposing argument of substance dualism is monism (opposite of substance dualism), which is the argument that mind and the body are one and the same thing (Jehle, 2006). Someone who believes in this, might argue a situation where an individual experiences damage to the brain. Specifically, when an individual’s brain experiences damage from either drug abuse, physical trauma, or pathological diseases, the individual’s brain mental capacities are always imperiled. Indeed, if the mind and body are separate, the mental capacities would not be imperiled (Jehle, 2006). This brings about the question about why should brain damage signify to the minds capacities if all individuals have a brain? Hence, the mind and body must be considered as together because brain damage has an effect on the mental and physical
Open Document