The Atlantic Slave Trade by David Northup includes four essays that offer arguments on the cause of African slavery. “The first paper was written by Eric Williams, a historian who studies the economic view of African slavery; he argued that slavery was not born out of racism but rather a consequence of slavery”(Williams, 2). “The second paper in the book was written by David Eltis; he argued that slavery was not caused just by economics because it would have been more reasonable and cheaper to enslave Europeans”(Davis, 7). “The third essay was written by David Davis, he argues that slavery was caused by developments in the medieval Islamic world which reinforced African slavery”(Davis, 13). “The last essay written by Linda Heywood and John …show more content…
He argues that Africans were just not enslaved because of economic reasons but it was cheaper to bring enslaved Europeans to the New World. He also argues the notion that prejudice against blacks did not create the African slave trade. The first example that Eltis explains is that “ we must explore the labor options of early modern Europeans- both those that were tired and those that were not”(Eltis, 8). Eltis is proving that European labor options where cheaper than African labor options. The second example that Eltis uses is “ the crux of the matter was shipping costs, which comprised by far the greater part of the price of imported bonded labor in Americas”(Eltis, 8). Eltis is trying say that European shipping costs was at a much lower price than African American shipping costs. Another segment that Eltis goes into is the advantages of using European slaves by saying “ Unskilled male convicts from England and Ireland sold for sixteen euros each in Maryland in the years 1767-1775 at a time when newly arrived African male slaves in the prime age group were selling for about triple this amount in Virginia and Maryland”(Eltis, 9). In other words, Eltis is explaining that there was no reason why the Europeans enslaved Africans when Africans were more expensive than to enslave Europeans. David Eltis’s argument about why Africans were enslaved is most likely …show more content…
Well through the analysis of the book The Atlantic Slave Trade written by David Northup there are four essays that claim why Africans were enslaved. The first essay was written by Eric Williams and his argument was that slavery caused racism but there was economic motives that caused slavery. The second essay was written by David Davis entitled “Ideas and Institutions from the Old World” he argued that the developments in the medieval Islamic world influenced European racism and brought African slavery to Europe. The third essay was written by Linda Heywood and John Thornton and its titled “European and African Cultural Differences”. They argue that Europeans saw African Americans like themselves and not like Africans form Africa. The fourth essay was written by David Eltis its titled “The Cultural Roots of African Slavery”. He argues that Africans were not just enslaved for economic purposes but he also argues that it would have been cheaper to enslave Europeans and bring them in New World. Lastly, the most likely explanation of why were Africans enslaved was David Eltis’s argument. That stated Africans were not just enslaved for economic purposes but he also argues that it would have been cheaper to enslave Europeans and bring them in New World. This argument is most likely correct because it explores not just the economic reasons behind why Africans were enslaved but the cultural reasons
In the documents “Considering the Evidence: Voices from the Slave Trade” it shows how the Atlantic slave trade was an enormous enterprise and enormously significant in modern world history. In document 15.1 - The Journey to Slavery it talks about the voice of an individual victim of the slave trade known as Olaudah Equiano. Equiano was taken from his home and sold into the slave trade. He worked for three different families while in the slave trade but what is different about him is that he learned to read and write while being a slave. He traveled extensively as a seaman aboard one of his masters' ships, and was allowed to buy his freedom in 1766.
In Slavery, Freedom, and the Law of the Atlantic World, Sue Peabody and Keila Grinberg give readers a unique perspective into the slavery laws written in the Atlantic World. While reading, we learn the dynamics of slavery and freedom to be very complex. Today, we imagine these two concepts to be distinctly different. One is “an absolute evil” and the other is “a self-evident good . . . We rarely stop to wonder what slavery and freedom mean in concrete terms” (Peabody and Grinberg, 1).
The African slave trade was very harsh for many reasons. This is because the idea of capture/sale was inhumane, blacks were kept in cages, conditions of ships were horrible, and one out of every three blacks died on the way over. By 1800, ten to fifteen million blacks had been transported as slaves to the Americas; while in Africa, fifty million human beings lives' were lost to death and slavery in those years. Blacks were easier to enslave than whites and Indians, but still were trouble to keep under thumb. These Afro-Americans rebelled by often running away and attempt to find family or sabotaging their work.
The enslaved Africans were viewed as property, meaning they could be sold and shipped off across the sea for work and labor. The Transatlantic slave trade expanded despite the consequences for the enslaved africans because of economic success, transportation of new goods to new places, and
This chapter addresses the central argument that African history and the lives of Africans are often dismissed. For example, the author underlines that approximately 50,000 African captives were taken to the Dutch Caribbean while 1,600,000 were sent to the French Caribbean. In addition, Painter provides excerpts from the memoirs of ex-slaves, Equiano and Ayuba in which they recount their personal experience as slaves. This is important because the author carefully presents the topic of slaves as not just numbers, but as individual people. In contrast, in my high school’s world history class, I can profoundly recall reading an excerpt from a European man in the early colonialism period which described his experience when he first encountered the African people.
Additionally, the more specific choice to use African Americans as slaves was because of “the impossibility of using Indians and the difficulty of using whites, the availability of blacks offered in greater and greater numbers by profit-seeking dealers in human flesh, and with such blacks possible to control because they had just gone through an ordeal” (Zinn 1). The settlers decided to use what was most convenient to them, again, a selection they made. Finally, their treatment of the African American slaves as cruel and ruthless, for instance packing a large amount of them in a boat for transportation,, further shows the decisions they made for their convenience, showing how racism is not
Document 1 shows the year of emancipation in various countries in the Americas and Muslim world; it can be seen that most of the American countries emancipated slavery about a century before most of the Muslim countries did so. As most of the countries eventually emancipated slavery because of internal pressures from the public, it can be deduced that the American countries had greater public pressure on slavery earlier on than did the Muslim countries. This could be because of the difference in treatment of slaves where slaves in the Americans were treated significantly more harshly than their counterparts in the Muslim world. Document 4 is a table showing the usage of slaves in Cuba in 1825 and it can be seen that the majority was used for rural farming while the minority was used for urban occupations. This is opposite to slave use in the Muslim world, where the majority was used for urban work and the minority was used in the rural fields.
The Americas were full of tons of ways to make money. Originally the Native Americans were forced to work in mines and plantations, but eventually the use of Native Americans was outlawed. Because of this the african slave trade increased. They were treated horribly and without dignity. The absence of humanitarian concerns influenced the african slave trade in three main ways: treatment, punishment, and transportation.
These sources mainly reinforced the thoughts about slavery. Slaves were considered less than human, and in turn were treated as such. Slave men and women and women had absolutely no rights . Their lifestyle was entirely dependent on their owner. They were considered "property".
With the conquest of the newly-found Africa, came the introduction of slavery, which led to the enslavement of nearly 7.7 million African slaves by Europe between 1492 and 1820. The Europeans believed that this New World would provide them with the riches that couldn’t be found in Europe. Along with these riches, Europeans were also in search of religious and further social equality.
In summary, foreseeing the ill emanation of importing such numbers of slaves, has attempted to lay a duty on them, which would amount to restriction. Nevertheless, no governor dared pass such a law, having orders to the contrary from the Board of Trade at home. Indeed, since cash was exhausted by the war, the importation has stopped; poverty was then the best defense (Jefferson). There was no fixed price of maize, wheat, and victuals; so the Europeans took advantage of the requirements of strangers, who were forced to purchase some slaves and land. This has pushed Europeans into the original sin and curse of purchasing slaves, which explains why there was a shortage of merchants, traders, or specialists of
By using this reference, it illustrated the severity of the alienation of blacks in the Southern United States. In 1619, a Dutch ship “introduced the first captured Africans to America, planting the seeds of a slavery system that evolved into a nightmare of abuse and cruelty that would ultimately divide the nation”. The Africans were not treated humanely, but were treated as workers with no rights. Originally, they were to work for poor white families for seven years and receive land and freedom in return. As the colonies prospered, the colonists did not want to give up their workers and in 1641, slavery was legalized.
Christopher Columbus is a villain because he emerged an economic system in which Africans were used as slaves, forced Christianity on the Natives of North America and treated the Native Americans very cruelly. Columbus’s discovery of the New World convulsed Europe, Africa, North America and South America. The economic system that had emerged was called the Columbian Exchange and involved Europe, Africa, North America and South America. In this economic system Europe provided the markets, capital and technology; Africa provided the slave labor and the New World provided the its raw materials. Columbus traded goods from the New to Africa in exchange for slaves and the Africans unwillingly became slaves to work on the plantations of the New World.
This excerpt is extremely important because it makes us better understand the status of African people, subdued by the European nations, and how the concept of slavery was perceived and addressed by
Slavery in Africa and in Latin America was distinct, despite being connected through the Atlantic slave trade. While traditional African slavery was practiced largely by communities to help produce food or for prestige, slave labor in Latin America was practiced on a much larger scale, for it was central to the colonies’