The Barefoot Boy Poem Analysis

865 Words4 Pages
John Greenleaf Whittier, born on December 17, 1807, in Haverhill, Massachusetts. Whittier experienced childhood with a ranch and had small tutoring. Subsequent to distribute one lyric, he went to Haverhill Academy and was a shoemaker and teacher. When he was 20, he sufficiently composed to get the consideration of book lovers and editors in the abolitionist cause. He was a Quaker, gave to social causes and change. He worked for some abolitionist daily papers and magazines. Childhood, It is a valuable time in which kids should live free from terror, worries, safe from brutality and protected from manhandle and abuse. Whittier utilizes the poem, "The Barefoot Boy" to clarify the pursuers how a childhood is treasured, and stunning to have. He…show more content…
The metaphor in the stanza is a standout amongst the most vital parts of beautiful style that must be aced. Representation can be depicted as different method of expression in which a thing is alluded to as being something that it takes after. "Happy if they sink not in the quick and treacherous sands of sin" the kid comprehends that he needs to appreciate those late spring days of being a barefoot kid in light of the fact that the obligations of adulthood will come soon enough. The artist is utilizing representations to put us, the pursuers, in the kid 's shoes and perceive how terrified he is, the point at which he grows up and begins to stress with issues that he 's up against later on his adulthood. I can identify with "the barefoot boy" with regards to growing up, and the life from a child is distinctive and less demanding. Getting up in the morning, go to class, do the classwork, leave school lastly return home and do only nothing but relax in your house. Nonetheless, contrasting it with being a grown-up need to stress over work, possibly support and place effort into your family, taxes and bills, school, sufficiently sparing cash only for crisis, watching what you spend the past couple days. Consequently, I can see why the artist exaggerates on the
Open Document