Introduction: Imagine living in a world where a slightly creak in your voice can stop you from getting a job. As unfair as that may sound, this can and do happen. Whether good or bad, people are judged based on their appearance and presentation of oneself, and how people talk is no exception. It is not farfetched to say that if a person wants to be taken seriously, they would try to speak more intelligently and carefully. In my research, I am going to examine how people can be perceived and how they are affected by the way they sound. Specifically, I am going to analyze the benefits and consequences of women using creaky voice, also known as vocal fry, as part of their speech. My research aims to uncover people’s true feelings towards creaky …show more content…
Women believe that, like men, speaking in a lowered tone (with creaky voice) will make them appear more authoritative in a professional environment. Yuasa described this as, “another consequence of American women’s unconscious efforts to adopt typically male characteristics” (Yuasa, 2010, p.319). However, Yuasa’s study reveals that women do indeed benefit from speaking with a creaky voice. Participants in her study perceived the women who spoke with a noticeable creak as being well-educated, upwardly-mobile, and, in some instances, more sexually desirable. (Yuasa, 2012 p.319-320, 330) Additionally, participants rated these women to be more approachable and more sympathetic, “[the] use of creaky voice as a sympathy-eliciting device contrasts with its use to express authority mentioned above. The former usage reflects positive-politeness, which emphasizes commonality between the participants (of the conversations), while the latter designates negative-politeness, which highlights the differences between them. In other words, creaky voice can convey two opposing meanings” (Yuasa, 2010, p.320). Essentially, Yuasa’s study demonstrated how creaky voice can be very beneficial to women if they want to be respected and taken seriously in a professional space. Yuasa’s study also demonstrated that women can be perceived as more sympathetic when speaking with a creak which benefits women further by making it easier to extend
Rose Yi 30 October 2015 Synthesis of Deborah Tannen’s “Who Does the Talking Here?” In her paper, “Who Does the Talking Here?” , Deborah Tannen takes a look at the conclusion of various studies and uses real life examples to bring about a compromise on the endless argument of which gender talks the most. Throughout her essay, Tannen mentions several different research studies on the topic of discovering whether men or women talk more.
On October 25th in the year 2000, a film was release that tackled the difficult topic, that at the time, broke family ties and rattled an entire culture from a single procedure. In Josh Aronson’s film, “Sound and Fury”, the topic of cochlear implants was fought about between an extended family, who both had Deaf children. The families thought very differently about the cochlear implant procedure and this lead to many arguments and even splitting of the families for some time. The cochlear implant procedure threatens Deaf culture and was considered very offensive to the Deaf community. Throughout the documentary, these topics were debated back and forth, about whether the benefits outweighed the risks.
Young women are running out of oxygen. Do you know why most of them sound like this? Surprisingly, there is a word or phrase for the way Kim Kardashian speaks. Kim uses something called a vocal fry, a low creaky vibration tone of voice. In the text, They’re, Like, Way Ahead of the Linguistic Currrrve by Douglas Quenqua, he uses tone, style, and structure to show that America’s young women use vocal fry.
In his essay "Speech Communities," Paul Roberts mentions the importance and impact speech communities have on an individual's form of speech. According to Paul Roberts language is always changing due to three distinct features: age, social class, and geography. All which are the basis for forming speech communities and causing then to eventually adapt and evolve. When discussing the speech communities of a child, Roberts makes an intriguing point. He states that no matter what speech habits were engraved in a child from birth through its parents, they are all prone to change once they interact with a different speech community such as school.
Pearson's purpose is to emphasize that the Voice is the solution to the problem of recognition and that it
In Deborah Tannen’s article, “But What Do You Mean?” Tannen exchanges her view on seven topics of a predicament in a communication between both men and women. The seven topics which are apologies, criticism, thank-you’s, fighting, praise, complaints, and jokes. In this article, Tannen focuses on women mostly as her primary examples, such as giving more examples of women’s misinterpreting and miscommunicating in conversations. However, I believe that her article is too old and that her claims about the ways men and women communicate are too rigid.
In the story “Speech Sounds” written by Octavia Butler an illness has taken over the world in which people are unable to speak. The main character Rye is a college English professor that is traveling to Pasanda to visit some of her relatives that have survived the terrible illness. After the bus gets stopped due to a fight, she meets another main character named Obsidian whom she becomes friends with and chooses to travel the rest of the way with instead of waiting on the train. The two characters have two major challenges, one being that Rye can speak and understand communication while Obsidian cannot understand verbal communication at all. Rye was challenged by not knowing how to communicate with Obsidian without using words.
Nadine Sia SOC-1 Professor Thompson November 10th, 2015 You Just Don’t Understand This article was about the difference between how men and women perceive conversation. He opens up with a conversation that both parties took very differently than the other. He then goes on to explain more differences, such as status vs. support, independence vs. intimacy, advice vs. understanding, etc.
Women have found themselves at the bottom of society’s hierarchal pyramid for eons. Even though females make contributions that prove vital to the world’s function, they are still regarded as the weaker link. The female plight of constantly facing debasement is a pawn used to ensure compliance. It is a common notion that if one is demeaned enough, he or she will conform to the suggested persona. Society tests this notion through its treatment of women.
Sex, Lies and Conversation There are many differences between a man and woman, communication is just one difference. Deborah Tannen, a University of California graduate, got her PhD in linguistics at Georgetown University; there she studied the communication between men and women. Tannen has published over one hundred articles and wrote over twenty books, including You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation (1990), which spent almost four years on the New York Times best seller list and was translated into twenty-nine languages. The article Sex, Lies and Conversation appeared in the Washington Post in 1990 and gives insight to how opposite sexes communicate with each other. From an early age we are programed to play and be friends with the same gender as our own.
Commonly when approaching a peer, teacher, or a stranger, the first phrase to be said is often a form of polite speech. Polite speech can be categorized by the use of phrases that show regards for others. With some people backing the sense that what is said is portrayed as literal speech, most of it is said for the sake of sounding welcoming and responsible. Having polite speech implemented into people’s day to day lives serves the function of creating a well developed impression of a person.
Women in their early thirties had started to use less traditional speech and opting for a more gender neutral style. Even though, women are opting for a neutral style of speech there is still some differences between young women and young men speech. For instance, women between the age of twenty and thirty would use私 (わたし), while younger girls would use うち. Recently, some girls have been adopting the word僕 (ぼく), sometimes they would even use俺 (おれ). In male speech, they use first-person pronoun 俺 (おれ) and the second-person pronoun お前 (おまえ). The ending of male speech also changes to えぇor たかい toたけぇ、ない toねぇ、きたない to きたねぇ、やばい to やべぇ.
Morghan Renfrow Instructor C. Shackelford English 1113, Section 101 1 September 2016 Analysts of “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently” An essay written by Deborah Tannen called “How male and females students use language differently”, is describing how they talk and interact with others. The writer presents different studies on how language changes based on a certain person. The essay states that men are more aggressive and talkative, while women are calm and modest about talking about the views they share.
The essay, “What I’ve Learned from Men”, by Barbara Ehrenreich is an impressive piece of writing focusing on a significant theme which is still present and is witnessed to this day. The theme that the author discusses is the on-going gender issues shedding light on the differences between men and women. Throughout the essay, Ehrenreich argues about the one thing women need to learn from men: how to be tough. She support this argument by providing a personal experience, taking her back to the time when she didn’t acknowledge the quality of being tough and falling victim to sexual harassment. She then explains this act as “behaving like a lady” and continues to support her claim by stating facts describing how women tend to act nice or “as a lady” by being the ones responsible to keep the conversation with a man going and constantly smiling even when unneeded and even when expressing anger and displeasure.
One of these perspectives is analyzing communication through gender. In the book, You Just Don’t Understand, Deborah Tannen (1990) popularized the term “genderlect” to describe the way in which men and women communicate with each other. She suggested that men and women have different styles of conversing, forming two distinct dialects. In a review of Tannen’s book, DeFrancisco (1992) attributed the differing communication styles of men and women to the respective cultures in which they grow up. Because of such gender differences, misunderstanding between men and women creates a gap in the communication process.