Knowledge claims are constantly being produced, all with varying content and significance. However, certain knowledge is considered to be more valuable than others. We believe that knowledge that is produced with difficulty is intrinsically superior to knowledge that is reached more easily. And while I do agree with his, I do so under the notion that we assess the difficulty of production of knowledge differently in different areas of knowledge and even within these areas themselves. It is also important to consider what our the valuing of knowledge looks like across different areas. This tendency to value knowledge produced with difficulty will be investigated in the natural sciences, language, and art. Comparing the natural sciences to subjects …show more content…
Elaborate Renaissance paintings like Raphael's “The School of Athens” are praised for their technical skill and details which took the artist weeks to complete. The difficulty of production is clear to the audience as they often think of their own artistic skill and realize how hard it must have been to paint that image so realistically. Many might point to modern artwork then as an example of the valuing of knowledge that is produced easily. However, these people fail to see that these works, although sometimes produced with much less visible effort, are often even more challenging than their classical competitors. It is easy to see the difficulty in the completion of a picture-like portrait, but the general public struggles to see the validity in the praising of contemporary art like Yves Klein’s blue monochrome canvases. Klein’s works offer a simplistic and yet confusing approach to art. Many people question his works claiming that anyone can paint a canvas one color. So what makes a work of art meaningful? While Klein’s works are simple in execution, he himself “believed that the idea behind a work was more important than the execution” (Lacayo). This argument is the key concept to understanding the difficulty and subsequent value and in works that seem, on the surface, …show more content…
Once we accept that the difficulty is relative to the time, person, and purpose in the production of knowledge, we can see that all knowledge is carries some difficulty in its production, even if the surface level does not show it. Additionally, just as the difficulty is subjective, as is our valuing of knowledge. While some may give value in the form of formal publication and others based on the audience that their knowledge reaches, all knowledge receives some valuing since it is acknowledged and
Each painting is unique, with a tactile presence, which reveals the hand of the artist. The image, which was the product of a split second drive by photo, now takes on substance through both the physicality of the paint, and through the contemplation of place and time. In this, the paintings come to represent more of a testament to her experience than the photographs. In the essay An Art That Eats Its Own Head – Painting in the Age of Images Barry Schwabgley acknowledges photographs place in contemporary art while also confirming the significance of painting, “ Although it was
While reading “The Trouble with (the Term) Art,” written by Carolyn Dean in the summer of 2006, we are taken through an array of different scenarios that lead us to questions what art really is. Dean explores the idea that the word “art” is used far too often and too habitually, and that as we study the non-Western cultures we need to use much more discretion regarding what we call the different pieces of their culture. Throughout the essay, Dean supports her thesis that we too often categorize non-Western pieces as art by using different examples of how certain non-art pieces were deemed as art throughout the course of their history. Dean does this by using four key examples of how these ancient pieces are inappropriately called art to successfully support her thesis and avoid biases.
The two pieces of art I will discuss is Edouard Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and Mary Cassatt 's ‘Woman in Black at the Opera’. Manet’s Olympia was not critically accepted, the reaction to his painting was negative, only four critics out of sixty were favorably disposed to Olympia. Olympia was a derivative of Titian 's Venus. In 1863 the critics and the viewers didn’t know how to take Olympia, “they were unable to cope with so many novel factors and so they were unable to categorize the picture and so were unable to analyze it or understand it in any context” (Laurence, 2012). Nowadays we are more open minded and are able to see the painting in a different light.
The pursuit of knowledge is what makes us advance as a society, actually, some people may think it gives you power. Nowadays, technology and science are constantly advancing, but taking it to a point where you make it your only priority, can turn into an unhealthy obsession that will consume your life. This can be related to the novel Frankenstein: the Modern Prometheus, by Mary Shelley, in which Victor Frankenstein deals with the risks of the pursuit of knowledge. Mary Shelley uses the characterization of Victor and the conflicts that he encounters to convey that the pursuit of knowledge is a dangerous quest, as evidenced by his ambition and isolation.
“Art does not reproduce the visible, but makes visible (Franciscono, p13),” and it makes one aware of those things, which are basic, elemental and universal, and exists in a state of change around us. In everyday language of abstraction refers to the process by which one draws a generalized notion or formula from real experience. Abstract art is accompanied by conceptual images from natures which starts with the elements of lines, color, and forms. Klee’s main emphasis was to make sure these elements demonstrate once their task in a pictorial
When we look back at the history of art, we can see the expression of a plethora of subjects such as the human condition and many other themes of the same nature. As time progresses, this form of human expression will be regarded as a highly valuable facet in our lives, as it also marked important times in our history. But what is it that makes the works of artists valuable? Is it because of its inimitability? Or is it because it makes us deeply contemplative and philosophical?
The search for knowledge is arduous, to utilize knowledge wisely can be blessings, but
“The Intellectual Life of the Early Renaissance Artist”. Yale University Press, 2002. “The Intellectual Life of the Early Renaissance Artist”, a book written by Francis Ames-Lewis, evaluates how artists were regarded as artisans and craftsmen in the early 15th century. According to Ames, artists gained intellectual respect promoting the ideas of artists as creative geniuses. Each artists had a distinct identity and individuality within their artwork.
For example, Protagoras said “Man is the measure of all things.” By creating exceptionally fine art, artists and philosophers found a way to detail the feature of human beings themselves. For instance, Michelangelo’s sculpture, David, was a mastepiece difficult to imitate even today, showing surprising details of a sturdy man. Da Vinci’s The Last Supper, still leaving mysteries, today, particularly highlights the characteristics of people of different emotions.
The Human Race has always felt in need for having consensus and disagreement in what concerns to knowledge. “Robust” knowledge itself can be defined as a type of ability that allows humans to apply it in their own world of things and at the same time be able to make use of it. The Greeks referred to this type of knowledge as techne. This essay will focus on the knowledge requirements and how different areas of knowledge rely on both consensus and disagreement to achieve a robust knowledge. History and Arts both in general need so much consensus as disagreement, to create the common goal of achieving what is call a higher level knowledge.
“Visual Arts cultivate thinking, innovation and collaboration.” As I write this paper today, I realized how each of us analyse everything in our lives without even meaning to do so. The museum that I decided to visit virtually was the Offizi Gallery in Italy. Located in Florence, this gallery included numerous paintings, sculptures and ceramics. The art piece that I have decided to write an analysis on today is The Birth of Venus by Sandro Botticelli.
Because of this fact, knowledge can be seen as a vital quality to
Whilst the knower’s perspective is always essential in the pursuit of knowledge, it’s essence is greater in some areas of knowledge than others. Perspective shapes both what we pursue in knowledge and it affects how we interpret pursued knowledge. Whilst the latter has greater influence over subjective areas such as the arts and history, the former affects even the pursuit of knowledge in more objective areas such as the natural sciences and maths. What’s more, for knowledge to be knowledge, there must be a knower. Each individual knower gains knowledge through the ways of knowing reason and emotion (amongst others); these ways of knowing shape and are shaped by our perspective.
In this world we live in, it revolves around knowledge and wisdom. As humans, we always crave for something more—more about things we know, knowledge about things we don’t know about. Therefore, we dig deeper to know more about ourselves, don’t we? Knowledge, as defined, is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association. Every day that we face bears new experiences which we encounter for us to learn.
Theory of Knowledge Essay “Without application in the world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge. In contemporary society, it is often argued that the value of knowledge is determined by its application to the real life situations. I am of an emphatic opinion that without application, the value of knowledge certainly abates.