The college education should be free because there will be more educated citizens and less debt. Most of the united states citizens are in debt because of financial problems and their daily needs. When the lower and middle-class students want an education and they cannot afford it they would use loans, this will add more debt and more financial worries to their lives. When education is made free most of the citizens will not have as much debt and live happier lives. According to the article why should college be free for everyone?
By giving them a monthly allowance, give them free foods and engage them in free extra curriculum activities that will make it eligible for them to qualify for scholarships. However, those not living in poverty will have to pay for other things. The money coming from children with high social class goes towards other children suffering from poverty. Also, governments have decided to open careers centers for apprenticeships with carpenters, hairdressers, and technicians. Not everyone can afford to pay for schools to learn these skills, and since poverty influences education many of them are behind academically.
Education is often considered as the key to economic development as a well as the key to success in any society. As a result, the government and other education stakeholders need to work hand in hand to ensure that the quality of the education administered in their jurisdictions and states meets the international standards and can help create a pool of educated citizens. In recent years, the issue of making public university and college education free has hit the media with all media houses, leaders as well as citizens from different states and regions presenting their cases for and against this idea. This issue first came into the limelight during Democratic nominations last year when both candidates expressed their intentions in making higher learning in our colleges and universities free for all students. Just like most countries in the world today, united states only offer free primary and high school education, but public university and college students receive living grants, tuition subsidies and public loans to finance their education.
Money is the basis of living , even people with lower income degrees could support themselves before the cost of tuition went up drastically. However, when you add student loans in the mix , debt over takes the standard of living. Ellison has heavy focus on this because he wants to highlight a big reason why free tuition can be beneficial for people in the long run. He believes if free tuition was put in place , every college graduate, lower income or higher income, will be able to live within their
Do not make this mistake because sometimes the colleges with the highest sticker prices offer the lowest net prices to students who don’t have a lot of money (aka you). This is why net price is a more important number to consider than sticker price. There are several ways to help cover college: Student financial aid is funding that is available to students attending college. This financing is to offer assistance in covering the numerous costs that come with college. Financial aid is available from federal, state, educational institutions, and private agencies, and can be awarded in the forms such as grants, education loans, work-study and scholarships.
Homeschooling and public schooling can be equally educational for students. However, homeschooling and public schooling can be different in various of ways. Like for instance, homeschooling and public schooling have their advantages , disadvantages and ways of developmenting. Homeschool started around the mid-century .its success is important to focus on because it is where homeschool came from and reasons parents prefer homeschooling than public school (Moreau 8). Arguments say that public schools benefit more than homeschooling.
All United States citizens should receive free college tuition because it would make more students get higher education which in result would make us over all smarter with better jobs. Have a better job would also result in our economy grow because there would be more jobs making less people be unemployed and making more money to contribute back in the economy. College tuition should be free because there are many underprivileged families whose kids work hard in school that deserve to be able to have a college education. Some kids who do amazing in school and receive amazing grades are not able to get into the college they want due to the high cost of tuition. In 1918 public schooling became a requirement for people up to the age of 18, now in the 20th century a college degree is becoming a requirement in getting a job but not a right to all American citizens.
Public schools are educatory places where students revive education for free. As in Egypt public schools had improved a lot compared to what it has been years ago. However, there remains many problems such as lack of funds, unqualified teachers, crowded classes, and lack of facilities. This problem has to be solved as education is important for the country to gain power and improve with its children. Therefore, anyone holding the ministry of education should take acknowledge that education is not for students to learn and wright but for the economic growth of the nation (Reda, Mohamed).
The origin in matters is that education is the responsibility of the state represented by the government. If it was real that the education of the citizen is a right to him, then he must be provided with a good and sophisticated educational service and this will be a basic responsibility of the state. However, the contribution of the private sector in the creation and management of schools, universities, and other educational institutions has increased in the last decade of the twentieth century. This was with the beginning of the transformation in the twentieth century whether such transformation was in the economic and social transformation processes that occur in the world, east, and west. The role of the private contribution to the sector in the education system is different in the relative to the size of this contribution from one society to another.
(2015) investigated the status of income inequalities in the country as well as inequalities in education and labor. The researchers found that poverty in the country, as measured by income and expenditure, did not change from 2003 to 2009. Findings also show countries that provide more pro-poor programs have lesser cases of income inequality. While the measure of poverty depends mainly on income, this might not be the best means to measure the welfare of the people. One reason stated for this is the increased ownership of durable goods of both poor and non-poor households despite economic crisis in the years mentioned.