Lumber felling has been an important yet controversial topic that has caught the eye of both environmentalists and economists. Moreover, this has created several techniques and practices used today in forestry. These practices include clear cutting, selective cutting, and strip cutting. Selective cutting or also known as selective felling is the cutting down of selected trees in a forest so that growth of other trees is not affected. Usually this done accordingly to a specific criteria including minimum tree size for harvesting, specifications of the number, spacing and size classes of residual trees per area, and allowable cut (Selective Cutting) . Additionally, this practice has the ability to have many good benefits to both the economy and the environment. Including a good support system of wildlife, leaves a lighter ecological footprint, and provide an increase in the economy through lumber and ecotourism. Generally, Selective Cutting is a highly beneficial practice that helps to preserve habitats, and provides a good support system of wildlife. Selective Cutting mentioned previously cuts a selected amount of trees throughout a forested area. With this cutting it is highly beneficial …show more content…
Others argue that other practices including strip cutting, and clear cutting are better options. Generally some of the advantages of clearcutting they state includes, boosts to the economy, increased water flow, and increased farmland (Clearcutting) . Additionally they state that strip cutting has many advantages as well including relies mostly on natural regeneration thereby possibly reducing regeneration costs and may have less impact on visual and other resource values because strips are smaller in scale than other clear-cut systems (Silvicultural Systems) . While there is many alternatives to selective cutting, this provides the best option for both the environment and the
Also they are slaughtered quickly and they feel no pain. In Conclusion local sustainable is a good
Forests were cut down, making lumber/timber rare. However, despite
They saved thousands of acres of land from erosion. They kept farmland from ruining and land from fires and diseases. They decreased soil erosion by laying some topsoil to prevent landslides and mudslides. Another way to decrease soil erosion
We recently did a debate on a major problem in the world today, environmental issues. Two students were given a topic, like landfills, deforestation, wildfires, etc., and had to debate on pros and cons on whether or not it is good for the environment. I did not like the setup of the debate because I could not hear some people and I did not feel fully engaged in the conversation. Overall, I liked how we were free to talk at times and the connections to real life scenarios. This was the first time I heard about Live Google which I thought was a really cool part of the presentation as I was able to expand on an idea more.
Deforestation is still an unbeleafable issue even to this day. With our trees being cut down to make supplies and furniture, we struggle with keeping our ratio of trees being destroyed and trees being planted equal. It seems like that was also the case in the past. There was a significant amount of trees being cut down in 1920, the land looking much more barren than it did in 1650 (Document A, map). These trees, some of them taking more than three thousand years to rise tall, are being cut down.
The effect of reduced forest size has already had a measurable impact on the composition of our atmosphere in the relatively short amount of time we have been cutting them down(6). Ironically however it is the conversion of forest land to urban and agriculture use that has a more permanent and detrimental impact. Logging and urbanization lead to forest succession. Forest succession happens when there are changes to an environment that causes the composition of plant and animal species to change. New species succeed the existing ones as a result of things like changes in amount of shade, temperature, or the introduction of foreign species.
When this happens it causes adverse effects on the environment. It can be done in a variety of ways from cutting to burning. Either way mass deforestation is bad and needs to stop before it is too late. One culprit of our deforestation is
By cutting down trees, many eco-systems get destroyed and many animals will not survive. I have noticed how this process occurs a lot in Florida. The Florida Everglades once compromised most of the state, and due to human development almost half
Government regulates hunting to control certain animal populations by setting hunting seasons, creating limits, and monitoring hunting efforts and animal populations. “In that case, hunting is good for the environment because the hunting community ensures that wildlife populations of game species are sustainable from one generation to the next. This requires that a diversity of natural habitats be kept intact, unpolluted, and undisturbed. Hunters support all these efforts” ("Why is Hunting Good for the Environment?").
Canada conserves and protects, these words are different but they are linked and relied on one another to keep a strong foundation for the ecosystem. Conserving, we can keep in mind when cutting down trees that there could be some sort of species who relies heavily on this are and we can consider the fact that it might not be safe to follow through with the cutting. Another point related to conserving would be to plant a wide variety of trees, varying on the age and type. Lastly we need to make sure that certain areas meet the needs of the habitable species living there.
The Forest Services argues that the environmental effects of the road and timbers sales will be analyzed and considered in the EA’s and/or EIS’s that it will prepare on the individual timber sales. They also argue that the sales are too uncertain and too far in the future for their impacts to be analyzed along with the
This act has a lot of cause and effects. Removing trees leaves animals with no place
Many people are of the belief that fishermen of bass are just as good as the lures he uses. While this is partly true for some situations, in real life, having an excellent lure for bass fishing a waste if one doesn't know how to put it to use. Say, its like a nuclear energy, used for the wrong purpose. People need to know where to use which bait, to catch the right stuff.
It would therefore be more realistic to encourage all parties involved in the process of deforestation to manage the resources of the forest in a sustainable way. This means that the usage of the methods of clear-cutting and burning would have to be eliminated if the forest ecosystem is to be able to remain intact. If certain trees need to be cut down, however, then theses should be replaced by enough young trees which can fill the same role to an equal extent as the ones which are cut down. Here it’s important to acknowledge that it’s impossible to eliminate deforestation completely since the growing population puts a high demand for more land which is used for agricultural purposes. Therefore the solution must include keeping a balance between deforestation and efforts of reforestation, sustainable management of forests and respecting the integrity of protected
With deforestation being one of these roles because when we chop down these trees and plants of where animals habitats our it also releases a lot of carbon dioxide into the air. And if you didn’t know forests are major carbon storage centers, when deforestation happens all the carbon dioxide that is stored in these forests; is released back into the atmosphere. Deforestation not only contributes to changes in the climate, it also causes localized changes in the weather. Trees transpire, or release water into the atmosphere, during photosynthesis. This water replenishes clouds and maintains rainfall.