Although, some say standardized testing is beneficial to the way students learn, statistics show that this is simply not true, standardized testing adds unnecessary stress on students, suppresses their creativity, and limits the creativity of teachers. To begin, standardized testing puts a lot of unhealthy
This can lead to many problems and if it is taken on a higher scale, it can affect the way that an entire school operates. When teachers only teach what is needed for the test and not what is important to the student or helps them individually learn, it changes the environment of a school. This also places importance on short term memorization and not persistence and actually learning the material. Standardized tests with high stakes, not just the STAAR, affect many aspects of a students life and education. If we think the most important part of an entire school year in regards to a students learning is one end of the year test, we might need to revisit the purpose of education.
Conclusion A. Review of Major Issues 1. Negative effects on school systems, blaming teachers for failed and low-test scores, and basing a child’s knowledge and skills off one test score are the reasons standardized testing is not working. The pressure placed on students and teachers to make sure these children graduate and succeed to higher grade levels is ridiculous. Many teachers are forced to teach the test to students, which makes learning intolerable for everyone.
All students dread the days when final exams arrive. We intergrate excitement back into education again and continuously having tests is not the way to do that. Standardized testing is known to lead to extreme levels of stress, limited education, and not evaluating the student 's knowledge fairly, all of which can be solved by a change in how we educate our students. In 1965 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was enacted by President Lyndon B. Johnson. The purpose of this act was to supply additional resources for the less privileged students and schools.
The Guardian says, “...as it will mean they have to fork out for expensive school uniforms time and again in order to pay for their children’s education. They will also need several versions of the same outfit…” Paying expensive costs for a school uniform is unneeded, especially when multiple versions have to be bought. Based on a survey conducted by the Statistic Brain Research Institute, an average school uniform already costs $249 and this does not help parents who are already struggling to support their family and child’s education. Uniforms furthermore cause problems for the staff, administrators, and faculty of the school who have to enforce a number of policies. On the other hand, others might argue that, “This is very useful for teachers and if it means fewer children going missing it’s of course a good thing.” This argument is unreasonable because students should be safely watched for their safety, and should not be in danger whether or not they are wearing a uniform.
The No Child Left Behind law was supposed to increase students’ motivation by creating high-stakes tests. This, however, is not the case. The law actually had the opposite effect on motivation; some students are so negatively affected that they are unable to finish the requirements to get their high school diploma (2). A poor test history leads to a poor mindset, in which students are “less motivated to learn and less likely to engage in critical thinking,” in the words of Audrey Amrein and David Berliner (Fulton 3). Instead of helping these students and motivating them, some of their teachers are so focused on getting them the information that they try to give them a lot of information in a short time, thus not giving the students a chance to properly learn.
The reason for this is because of my score on the ACT. Nowadays, colleges are so dependent on the ACT that getting an equal chance at college in nearly impossible for students that are horrible at standardized testing. Also, the ACT has the most unrealistic time limit in order to complete each portion of the test. Lastly, it seems as though the test makers do not understand that not all children have the privilege of having wonderful learning and living environments at home to help them excel in school. These reasons show that the ACT does not fairly reflect the knowledge, educational determination, and ability of the students to succeed in taking this test.
Cultural Diversity and the American Educational System In many of today’s schools there has been a push to teach one form or another, about cultural diversity or cultural awareness. This new trend is in many schools across the country, from California to New York. I will speak specifically about how schools are ill equipped to implement cultural diversity as a part of their curriculum and how it raises more problems then it solves. Schools are ill equipped to implement their cultural diversity goals for two reasons: the budget for the school is decreasing year by year, and many schools across the country find it hard enough to teach students about academics, let alone cultural awareness and emotional health. Everybody faces trade-offs.
In the education system, the teachers and faculty are parallels to the jury in Gilbert’s example because if they fail under a standard education system they are failing all of these people. This relates to how people feel like they are inferior when they fail under this system of education because a standardized education system is a bar that most people should be able to reach to succeed in life. Davidson’s essay, further explains this point on how standardized tests are an example of one of the standard bars set by society. Davidson even states that “our national educational policy depends on
This is so important because if children learn and get used to cheating at should a young age, then that is exactly what they will contribute to society, this will have detrimental and chaotic effects on society. Character education is absolutely necessary because of the effects on society when there is no morality guiding student’s actions. There are a variety of things that contribute to the growing lack of morality that has occurred throughout the twentieth century. The first is that many aspects of society condone behaviors that are not acceptable in the classroom. This causes children to be uncertain or confused about inappropriate and appropriate behavior in-group settings.