Renters policies specifically state what it insures against. There is a standard set of named perils covered by a renters insurance policy. Some of them are fire, lightning, windstorm, smoke, vandalism or malicious mischief, theft and accidental discharge of water due to a burst pipe. It can also include payment for the medical expenses of non-residents. Floods and earthquakes are oftentimes purchased separately from
This aspect renders eminent domain a major causal aspect of legislation controversies, as eminent domain presents a profound basis for litigation, which affects peace, harmony and unity of the United States as country. In this light, there is a dire need for the U.S government to abolish the practice of eminent domain, and to face the endeavor of finding new strategies, and new principles of acquiring private property in cases where the needs and wants of the public are deemed necessary (Gallagher & Elizabeth, p
It is hard to believe that intelligent human beings would use bad chemicals substances that would affect the environment and themselves negatively. Carson states that many people are not aware of the chemicals that are being used have
The other type is appropriation of name or likeness. Appropriation of name or likeness means “Plaintiffs may make a claim for damages if an individual (or company) uses their name or likeness for benefit without the other party 's permission” (Invasion of Privacy). The third type is appropriation disclosure of private facts, which means revealing private information that is not of public concern, and the reasonable person find it offensive for the public to know them. The last type of invasion of privacy is false light. False light is similar to a defamation claim.
Worrall appropriately points out that “any effective crime control strategy needs to be balanced against the possible argument that it threatens people's rights” (2008). Though this is true, there are too many cases of unethical civil forfeiture to ignore the problem. Controversy will always surround civil forfeiture because it has “powerful economic consequences” (Worrall, 2008), but every aspect of civil forfeiture must be examined so society can both see the merits of the system and stand up against the
You will receive protection for bodily injury that your actions cause another person and any relevant property damage that may occur as well. You will have protection from any legal claims or lawsuits that are made against you. Someone may take something you say out of context and sue you for slander. Even though the situation results out of a misunderstanding, defending yourself in a court of law can be a costly experience. Your umbrella insurance would also provide coverage for situations of false arrest and any other relative legal matter that arises as a result of someone taking legal action against
I agree, it is factual that we are facing severe environmental challenges. Even if the skeptics do not believe in the global warming, it is undeniable that the air and water pollution are caused by human activities. It is unhelpful to argue who is right, who gets more evidences or who eventually wins. If people just ignore the negative environmental impacts and do not implement any practical plans to deal with, our future generation will definitely suffer from
I totally agree with the argument that “The root cause even of physical and ecological problems are the inner constraints on our vision and values ...". This is mainly because of the human attitudes and tendencies towards the environment, and their consumption and reproduction patterns. Human being relationship with the environment has evolved rapidly over the years as mankind continue to increase his egocentric tendencies of desiring to maximize their wealth, consumption and reproduction (Gross, p.165). This argument can be explained by this week’s readings from the article by Rita M. Gross “Toward a Buddhist Environmental Ethic” as she tries to explain and apply Buddhist theories to issues concerning the environment. It is imperative to note that mankind’s desire to increase his consumption and reproduction are the main causes of ecological and physical problems.
The aspects of Misrepresentation in contract law Misrepresentation is a false statement of fact and law, which induces the represented to enter a contract. When a statement has been made during the course of negotiations it is then classes as a representation rather than a term an action for misrepresentation may be available where the statement turns out to be untrue. In misrepresentation has there different of types. • Innocent misrepresentation • Negligent misrepresentation • Fraudulent misrepresentation To find a misrepresentation is to find if the contract is voidable. The contract exists but may be set aside by the representee.
Contract laws outline what a person can or cannot include in an agreement, and what the remedies are if a party breaks their contractual duties. In contrast, tort law governs circumstances where one person has hurt or harmed someone else. Tort laws cover violation where the party purposefully hurt the other person, for example, in a battery claim. Tort laws also address
It 's the inspiration of fear or dread that has importance. In fact, when there is a touch between the offender and the suffered one, that 's where the intended civil wrongdoing of "battery" generally becomes an important factor in filing lawsuit. It’s essential to notice that the suffered one does not really need to be bodily harmed sequentially for a battery to happen under law. In nearly all states, all that 's necessary is that the act of touching becomes insulting or unsuitable (to a wise person) and that the offender intended for it to do. Carol publishes articles on health law on behalf of personal injury solicitors in Burnley.
Did the defendant take those precautions? There is a legal duty to act positively, on anyone who holds public office, if harm upon the plaintiff is foreseeable. They have the burden of eliminating the risk of harm to the community. In this case, as Clint had previously committed serious crimes and was currently out on bail for a serious crime, Anne and Bernice’s concerns where not unreasonable, as there was strong chance of Clint causing harm to either or both of them. An act is wrongful usually only if it has some consequence.
The Keystone pipeline should not be built because it endangers the environment and has the ability to create catastrophic damages through pollution and habitat desecration. Though many see benefits to the addition of a national pipeline, the effects and dangers must outweigh any slight economic gain. A small gain in government currency should never endanger the future loss of an environment, which is something than can cannot be
Stare Decisis Examining Hofsherier’s equal protection analysis the majority in Johnson not only held that the analysis was wrong but also concluded that stare decisis did not compelled to court to follow Hofsheier as precedent. In addition, Johnson indicated that Hofsheier’s analysis was faulty, which resulted in a number of sex crimes against minors. The Court referred to these “broad consequences” as the reason why stare decisis should not be allowed in order to correct an error in our constitutional jurisprudence. Stare decisis is one of the most important doctrines for the legal system. The doctrine states that courts are bound by decisions held in earlier cases.
The most important issue that must be addressed in this case is the principle of the “evolving standards of decency” and the uses of a national consensus. The “evolving standards of decency” were developed by Trop v. Dulles and have been implemented in one way or another in all of the precedents dealing with “cruel and unusual” punishment. It is important to treat these principles as an important aspect of “cruel and unusual” punishment jurisprudence, therefore turning from these set of principles would be foolish and a disregard for every precedent. However, it is important to acknowledge that each case satisfies the standards by using a different method; some use the presence or lack of state legislature as a judgment of consensus while others look at foreign countries. Both of the methods mentioned above are not helpful because they require inferences or distant connections in order to be a logical argument.