This idea is based on the fact that Scientists are quick to give credit to God in areas where scientists are not able to find answers. He is assigned to areas evolution cannot explain (10 Dangers of Theistic Evolution). This idea demonstrates that God is not exactly supreme and in some way evolves too. Another aspect of this idea of creation is in Adam and Eve. This theory follows the claims on the Bible, at least the ones pertaining to creation.
An example of religion and science working together is the theory of theistic evolution. “Theistic evolution represents one response in an attempt to solve the perceived conflict between the Bible and firm scientific evidence. Theistic evolutionists attempt to resolve this conflict by accepting mainstream science. They accept an old age for the universe and Earth, in addition to evolutionary theory. They accept natural cause as a viable explanation for how the universe came to its present state.
To combine culture it means you are combining science as well. To combine Christianity and evolution together is showing the works of God through science. Science is His creations and is being displayed as His works. Science is what helps proves that God is there by discovering new things God has created. “A scientific discovery is also a religious discovery.
God was perfect in his creation, making every aspect of the universe to His exact specifications. While Atheists argue that a creationist standpoint is a delusional fallacy not supported by science, the beauty and complexity of nature provide sufficient proof, in my eyes, for a creator God. Later on in the Old Testament of the Bible, Job speaks of this phenomenon. He writes “But ask the animals, and they will teach you. .
SOLUSI UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF THEOLOGY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES A report done in partial fulfillment of the course required RELT 389 SCIENCE OF ORIGINGS TERM PAPER: WEAKNESSES OF THE BIG BANG THEORY Presented By Takudzwa A Denhere ID: 2011050104 Lecturer: Mr. Sibanda The big bang theory and its history The big bang is not theoretical, it is a presumption. It is an attempt to explain what happened at the very beginning our universe. Some scientists do define it as an accepted knowledge which explains much on how the earth was created and that is the universe. The findings of the research in the study of the physics and astronomy have openly shown
Nicalea Greenlee Astronomy, 7 December 15, 2017 Science vs. Religion Science and religion has always been an argument for years. I think science and religion are both very important to the way of life and how we see the entire universe. But I believe religion is more believable than science. For science can be proven wrong at any given time and religion can never be stated untrue.
Creation myths are essential to a religion because they give an explanation for the origins of the world, and usually revolve around certain deities. In the Genesis creation myths, there is only one God who is the sole creator of the universe and everything in it. A crucial step on the path to monotheism was the naming of God “I am” because it identifies one single God. During the exodus of the Israelites from Egyptian oppression, God makes the ten plagues to show the people that the other “gods” are nothing in comparison to Him. The Egyptian magicians were able to imitate the first two marvels, however, they were unable to perform the third marvel.
On the other hand, the theory of creationism comes from a religious viewpoint believing that a God or higher being created the entire universe. In other words, evolution has a more scientific stance in the creation of the universe while creationism has a more religious stance in the creation of the universe. They have long been controversial topics fighting over which one is correct. But I believe evolution and creationism should no longer be controversial subjects where there
There are so many mysteries that remain unsolved even until now; one of them and probably the most popular is how life started and how organisms were ‘created’. There are two theories that stand out the most; evolution and intelligent design. While evolution explains how organisms had developed from simple forms billions years ago through a process called natural selection, intelligent design states that nature is too complex to happened by a random process like evolution by natural selection, thus there must be an “intelligent agent” that is responsible for the creation of the universe. William Paley, in his book Natural Theology: or, Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity explained intelligent design by comparing the complexity
Science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence, while religions include revelation, faith and sacredness (Wikipedia, 2014). While this division of methodologies is accurate, in my view, science also requires the adoption of revelation and faith into its methodologies. Revelation is an important methodology in science, without revelation, Archimedes wouldn’t have exclaimed 'Eureka! '; Einstein wouldn’t have developed his special theory of relativity and Newton would have only been angered by an apple falling on his head. The difference is that traditional religions require revelation through divine inspiration, communication from God and religious messengers- science relies on