Simon Baker's Ancient Rome, Tiberius Gracchus realized that the Senate was not in the best interest of the people and therefore tried to address one of Rome's biggest problems by become tribune and give the people back there land. He appealed to the common people by promising that he would get back what was rightful there's. This lead to him being voted in as tribune, and from there the problems of Rome, attempted solutions, and obstacles he faced only spiraled him down faster.
Tiberius was well loved by the people, but not so much by the Senate. Simon Baker's Ancient Rome says it best by saying "As Tiberius left the Senate House in disgrace, he received a very different reception from the Roman people" (86). Tiberius built on this trust with the plebs, and told them he could get their land back, and that he wanted to help. This is prompted him to become tribune. After achieving this status, he chose to identify one of Rome's biggest problems, the distribution of land. He claimed that the upper class had too much and the lower class had too little. Therefore he proposed a new law to be passed. The law where you could keep 300 acres and the rest would be distributed to who needed it the most. He hit many obstacles when trying to get it passed for voting such as Octavius, Roman people, Senate, and even fear of leadership. When faced with this
…show more content…
They chose to instead of supporting Tiberius to stand in his way any way they could. They even had Octavius veto the bill so that the Roman people could not vote. Tiberius responded by shutting down the republic to put pressure on Octavius. This ended up being a standoff between the two people, but it would shortly end. The Senate started convincing the people that Tiberius wanted to be king, and this had to stop according to them. When Tiberius gestured to his head, the last time he was on the stand, Nasica and the Senate used it to drive home their case, and kill
'Assess the significance of Pompey's early military and political career' Pompey's early political and military career were extremely significant and a leading factor to his success in the future positions he held in his time. He was born into both the political and military world, due to his father, Strabo, being in a high political position, eventually becoming consul. His father also impacted his military knowledge, being in command of his son for two years. At a young age, 23, Pompey was already of a high position in the military, and leading armies alongside Sulla, an older Roman consul. This is significant as he was extremely under aged for the position of praetor, however was still granted these powers, nevertheless, despite not holding
This corroborates with Williams when he comments that “On [Gaius’] return to Rome, he campaigned for the tribuneship and emerged in 123BC as tribune to take on Tiberius’ mantle” (1996). Hence, he wished to continue his brother’s reforms to help the lower classes, like his brother did. After the death of Tiberius, the senate resorted to unethical ways to keep their position and
Roman citizens had come to consideration that they, indeed, did have a poor government. The Roman government gave an unjust life to people based on their social rank (Document E). This led to the citizens not appreciating the government as well as the Empire. Most of the emperors in Rome were assassinated so it gives the citizens the intention that if you did not like the emperor you can just kill them (Document A).This tells the reader that it was hard to govern Rome because they constantly kept replacing emperors. Considering that Rome did not have a stable ruling system, citizens of Rome began to doubt and not depend on their government.
(Document F) As stated in and reflected in a fresco of the Roman Senate by artist Macari (Document F), the Senate had responsibilities and rights, among others, to control war, make foreign alliances, as well as control of public lands among others. While the Greeks may have had more equal representation, it was only through a quorum that they could conduct business (Document E). Athens also ostracized people who became powerful and were seen as a threat, and it was difficult to fulfill their responsibilities of citizenship (Document
For example, a bill introduced by Tiberius was without consultation with the Senate, which “was not illegal, but it violated a custom of long standing.” Furthermore, upon receiving a veto by fellow tribune Marcus Octavius, Tiberius had him removed from office with his power, which was unconstitutional. Such actions on his behalf led the Senate to fear his growing alleged tyrant power which eventually led to a revolt in which Tiberius and many of his followers were killed. Similarly, Gaius Gracchus was killed along with his supporters by his political foes as a result of his agrarian reforms that were accumulating a massive public following. These events portray one of the biggest aspects of the Gracchi legacy, which was violence as a means of political resolution.
There are many similarities between the Roman Republic senate and the United State senate. We can begin with both the Roman Senate and U.S. Senate. Members of opposing parties’ debate in chamber.
Tiberius, as Augustus' successor, continued this policy by adopting a cautious approach and preserving the appearance of a republican system. Caligula, in the early stages of his reign, initially adhered to this approach. Suetonius reports that Caligula respected the Senate and upheld its authority during the initial months of his rule. He distributed bonuses and organized public entertainments, similar to Augustus' practices, to gain popularity and maintain the illusion of a harmonious relationship between the emperor and the Senate (Suetonius, "Caligula,"
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, better known as the ‘Gracchi Brothers’ were a pair of tribunes descending from the plebs from the 2nd century BCE who sought to introduce land reforms and other legislations that aligned with their populist views/ideas. It can be said that the career of the two brothers was marked by murder, riots and outright manipulation of the power they were granted which completely altered the state of Roman politics- aiding in the breakdown of the Roman Republic. The legislation they sought to pass essentially redistributed major aristocratic land ownership among the commoners such as the urban poor and veterans. After achieving little success during the early stages of the reforms, both were assassinated by enemy parties.
People were not working. Everything was out of control; it was a free-for-all. Judges 21:25 accurately describes Rome at this time “All the people did whatever seemed right in their own eyes” (NLT). There was not enough people holding political power and the empire was becoming unmanageable. There were rebellions and surprise attacks.
Cicero came from a wealthy family was a consul in the year 63 B.C. He supported the democracy and did not trust Caesar and his desire for power (Cornine et al. 248-249). Caesar's dictatorship lasted only a year because he was assassinated by members of the senate (Biography.com
Considering Caesar’s approval surrounded by the senate, it gave him a copious number of enemies because other politicians were jealous of the number of things that he had accomplished in the republic. He also gave former enemies, ones he had previously conquered, positions in government. Some of these positions included the senate. This was ultimately the biggest mistake during his reign due to the fact that, these people conducted the assassination plot for
Many different internal and external pressures lead to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general, dictator and optimate, anticipated and was aware of the results of many powerful and
The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, had intentions of making Rome the best it could be, which contradicted the visions of the Senators. The two brothers grew up during a tough time in the Roman Empire, but they took it upon themselves to make a difference. “The Empire went through tremendous growth, through both acquisition of land, slaves, and various citizen classes.” This drastic growth ultimately led to a fall in the Roman political system. Tiberius, the older brother, founded the idea of the agrarian laws, which was later continued by his younger brother, Gaius, after his death.
The Greeks and Romans seem to be extremely influential on our modern civilization. Many Greek and Roman traditions and cultures play major roles in our civilization. These traditions and cultures are displayed throughout our government, education, art, architect, cultural activities, and many other things. I assert the most influential ideas the Greeks and Romans had are displayed in our government, art, and architecture. Their ideas have inspired over 25 centuries, growing and changing over time, and still remain in our modern civilization.
Augustus was only 17 year old when he had a positive relationship with the Senate because Augustus wanted to raise the tone of the Senate, reduce, its numbers, restore its former dignity, increase responsibility of its members and improve its efficiency. This relationship with the Senate remained for the rest of the Julio- Claudian Dynasty. Thus shows that Augustus had a positive relationship with the Senate. One of Augustus main aims was to reduce the size of the Principate he would work with, Augustus had reduced its numbers from 1000 and 800 in 23BC and then 600 in 27BC, and then 400 in 18BC by removing disreputable members who entered the Senate prior to Augustus through bribery or influence. Augustus laid down a monetary qualification of one million sesterces and added worthy men from the equestrian class.