This needs to change. There is nothing protecting the citizens of Florida from tragedies like the shooting at Majority Stoneman Douglas High School from occurring again. People need to realize that this is not an either gun or mental health issue. It is the fact that gun control laws do not stop the mentally ill from obtaining a dangerous firearm. Congress should be concerned with improving those
Gary Johnson being a third party candidate is a mixture of the republican and democratic beliefs. Johnson believes Trumps view about the wall is obscured, in his book on page 127 he states “A 10-foot wall just requires an 11-foot ladder." (Johnson, 2012). Pretty much meaning a wall is not going to change anything, the illegals will figure out a way to get over it. Johnson also believes we should do the illegal and unimaginable, that the fifty five million illegal Americans in the country right now should be able to easily get a work visa and start paying taxes and living as a citizen but not making them a citizen.
In this situation, the minimum penalty is $100 per violation with an annual maximum of $25,000 for repeat violations (Furrow et al., 2013). Tier 2 penalties apply to violations for reasonable cause, but not willful neglect. In this situation,
Raymond, S. G. (n.d.). Sisyphe - “Ten Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution.” Retrieved October 6, 2017, from http://sisyphe.org/article.php3?id_article=691 This article, “Ten Reasons for Not Legalizing Prostitution” by Janice G. Raymond, expands on how decriminalizing the sale of sex for both the sex workers and pimps has not led to a decrease in criminal sex abuse nor a decrease in sex trafficking and child prostitution. One point of this article is that making this practice of selling sex legal should only apply to the sex workers and not the pimps or buyers so that the women would not be punished for their personal choice, but the buyers and pimps can be as they force women into acts that they are against. This document also shows that as prostitution is legalized, more people will
These people claim that smoking marijuana is harmful to the lungs and brain development of teenagers. Cigarettes have the same, if not greater, damaging effect on human lungs yet the government does not infringe upon Americans’ right to take such health risks. Although there have been no scientific study to validate that smoking marijuana damages brain development, a simple resolution would be to make the legal age for smoking and possessing marijuana in the mid 20’s when the brain is completely developed. The argument of the dangers of marijuana can also be made for the opposing side. Illegal and unregulated marijuanna posing far more dangers to people than if marijuana was regulated by the government.
Currently, there is no national ban on texting or using a wireless phone while driving. However, a number of states have passed laws banning texting or using wireless phones. Some states require the use of hands-free wireless phones while driving. In California, the maximum penalty for a first-time offender is just $20, the lowest in the country; while Alaska will strike you with a whopping $10,000 fine and a year imprisonment.
‘In the late 1980s, gun control groups realized that they had failed in their original goal—getting handguns banned—and began campaigning against semi-automatic firearms they called "assault weapons," most of which are rifles’(“A ban on assault weapons would not reduce crime”). From 1994 to 2004, the Federal Assault Weapons (F.D.A) banned semi automatic weapons from having more than 10 rounds. The easiest way to define gun control is by saying it a government regulation sale of any type of handgun, or assault rifle. It’s just a certain style the government sales firearms, if you have a criminal background or criminal history you are not allowed to purchase a firearm due to gun control. I personally think gun control doesn’t cause any harm to today’s society, considering the fact that i’m constantly around guns and I have no violent urge to put anyone in danger.
The right to bear arms has been in the constitution as the second amendment since December 5th, 1791. This amendment should be repealed because in modern times all of us do not need guns. ”The rate of death from firearms in the United States is eight times higher than that in its economic counterparts in other parts of the world.” According to Kellermann AL and Waeckerle JF(1998) Nations of our size and power have found solutions to gun violence by making guns illegal and hard to obtain.
But then it occurred to be that as my memory is coming back to me was that it was illegal to have the suit manufacture. Sarah Elizabeth Howard writes, “Owning a zoot suit in wartime was not a crime, but it was a crime to manufacture the suit. The War Production Board placed a $10,000 fine on tailors who ignored the restrictions on cloth and material to make them” (Howard 114). In this society wanting to make something unique causes problems, but that doesn’t give them the right to punish us for what we thought wasn’t as harmful at that
It would create thousands of job opportunities, decrease the crime rate and open up cell space. It it could help people with physical, emotional, and psychological problems (“Drugs”). The prescription drugs people get from doctors are addictive where marijuana is non addictive. There has been cases of overdose from prescription pills where there has never been one case of overdose on marijuana. This is the safest option to head towards.
This notion that the federal government can monitor everyone’s phone data is a major departure from how Americans have traditionally viewed the role of the government. If this is acceptable practice, as the white house and many in both parties now say it is, then there are literally no constitutional protections that can be guaranteed anymore to citizens. In the name of security, the Constitution has become negotiable.” Because of this, the American
However, their current gun related homicides are 10% higher than last year (nytimes.com). The state of New York has shown increasing gun control laws will not decrease violence. Current gun control laws like waiting periods, gun registration, and background checks have proven to keep firearms out of the hands of those meaning to create violence. Therefore, there is no need to increase the current gun control policies.
The Pure Food and Drug act of 1906 was the 1st consumer protection law by the Federal Government, this act was passed by President Theodore Roosevelt. The main purpose of the Pure Food and Drug act was to prohibit transportation of contaminated, poisonous, and misbranded foods, drugs, medicines and liquors. Without the pure food and drug act our food, medication, and other product would be filled with dangerous chemicals that would have harm in our health and potentially cause death. Before the 20th century, there were no laws or regulations that protected Americans from hazardous foods and medicines. This meant that there were no restrictions of what chemicals could be put in one’s food or medicine, leaving the open to mass deaths of contaminated or poisonous products.
When he made his most definitive statement about not taking away people’s guns during the 2008 campaign, Obama added that “there are some common-sense gun safety laws that I believe in.”” . LaPierre maintains that background checks are equivalent to gun bans and gun confiscation. According to “The Australia Gun Control Fallacy” by Varad Mehta Australia doesn’t have a bill of rights, so their legislators have more say for their individual rights than ours. “Australians have no constitutional right to bear arms, so seizing their weapons did not violate their constitutional rights. Gun confiscation in the United States would require violating not only the Second Amendment, but the fourth and
When historical events are published it is mainly because these events have importance. The 19th amendment allowed women to have a voice which is why this topic is popular. This article narrows down the steps to the 19th amendment. The National Archives published an article in order to inform the importance of the 19th amendment which gave women the right to vote. When women took this sacrifice it was so women become one step closer to having equal rights with men.