ipl-logo

The Boston Massacre: Murder Or Self Defense?

280 Words2 Pages

Although there are many historians that go back and forth between believing that the Boston Massacre was murder or self defense. But it is clear that is was an act of murder on the part of the Red-Coat soldiers. There were many pieces of evidence leaning onto the side of murder, the first one being that every murder has a motive right? This motive involved a colonist named Samuel Gray and a soldier named Killroy. A day before the massacre happened, Killroy and Samuel got in a fight in Samuels shop. The night of the massacre Killroy had a chance, and he took it. Killing Samuel. Killroy in all the chaos and madness took his revenge on Samuel. Another great example of murder is that there were more colonists than soldiers. Yet no soldier was severely

Show More
Related

  • Shatyra Wiley Report: The Boston Massacre

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    After the shooting, the people of Boston demanded that the soldiers be tried and executed for the shooting. Two soldiers were found guilty of manslaughter. This whole incident is outrageous. There isn't any need to result to violence when something goes wrong.

    Read More

  • How Did The British Use Self Defense In The Boston Massacre

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    I believe that the British soldiers were using self defense in the Boston Massacre. Through witnesses and evidence, it is proved that the British killing the colonists was an act of defending themselves. In exhibit A, the crime scene showed how the colonists threw snowballs filled with rocks and sharp things at the British. I think that the British were only firing their guns back at the colonists to save themselves from being badly hurt. I believe that the British fired their guns at the colonists back without intentions go kill, but only to protect themselves.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Crispus Attucks And The Boston Massacre

    709 Words  | 3 Pages

    Crispus Attucks was born a slave in the town called Framingham, Massachusetts. Crispus Father was married to a woman who originated from Natick tribe. Back in 1750 William Brown was a slave owner in Framingham and advertised for the return of a runaway slave named Crispus. Crispus status was a free man or a runaway slave has been matter of debate of historians. He was temporarily in Boston by the early 1770’s and recently returned from a voyage from the Bahamas.

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: Why Did The Colonist Attack The British

    71 Words  | 1 Pages

    One week ago, the colonist attacked the British. This was a tragic event where the Colonist threw snowballs, clubs,oysters,and chunk of ice. In addition they told us the British,to fire if we dared, so we did but, on accident. Once one of us fired, other British started to. The colonist protested that they were unarmed but they really had many items that could kill.

    Read More

  • Unsolved History: The Boston Massacre

    318 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although many historians believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of murder, it is clear that the incident was self-defense. First, On March 5, 1771, a group of colonists gathered and started taunting a soldier in front of the Custom House. Quickly more colonists gathered around the soldier. Different sources say that there were anywhere from 70-200 men that were there that night. According to Unsolved History: The Boston Massacre, Captain Preston got a group of soldiers to go out and get the soldier.

    Read More

  • Crispus Attucks A Symbol For The Boston Massacre

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    He was the first victim to die from The Boston Massacre. Crispus Attucks was shot by a redcoat called Private Montgomery. The man who killed Crispus Attucks was hit with a stick and he decided to fire into the crowd killing 5 civilians including Crispus Attucks. Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, Samuel Maverick, Patrick Carr, and James Coldwell were the 5 civilians killed in The Boston Massacre. They were all buried in the same grave.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Following Passage Two Of The Boston Massacre

    570 Words  | 3 Pages

    Passage two of The Boston Massacre is better than Passage one of The Boston Massacre. Passage two has more details about the Boston Massacre than passage one. The way the soldiers and the young men speak is made to understand that it was in an older time instead of just being told. In passage one nothing was really explained but in passage two it was explained better. Passage two is better than passage one.

    Read More

  • Arguments For The Boston Massacre

    102 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Boston Massacre was self-defense because according to history from books on March 5,1770 groups of colonist decided to riot and surround the British soldiers, Throwing things at the soldiers and taunting them to fire. My first argument is Crispus Attucks took a cordwood stick and swung it at one of the soldiers who protected him from the blow. Attucks was yelling" Kill the dogs"! " Knock them over!" This is self-defense because Crispus Attucks struck the soldier first, and once the soldier was hit he could act back upon the hit and could do anything to protect himself from a contact

    Read More

  • Thomas Preston: Innocent Or Guilty In The Events Of The Boston Massacre

    1366 Words  | 6 Pages

    In recent discussions pertaining to Thomas Preston, a controversial issue that has been recognized is whether he was innocent or guilty in the events of the Boston Massacre. On one hand, some people dispute that Preston was faultless. From this perspective, it is believed that he was not to blame for the actions of his troops when they opened fire into the crowd. They believe the bitter actions of the troops should not reflect onto Captain Preston. On the other hand; however, others argue that Preston was undeniably at fault as he gave the commanding orders to fire into the crowd.

    Read More

  • What Was The Boston Massacre

    290 Words  | 2 Pages

    There was not a massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because according to Captain Preston and John Bufford, the colonist and the troops were both armed and attacked each other. This means that what happened in Boston was not a massacre. The first reason the event was not a massacre is because the event in Boston 1770 was a war. As stated by Captain Preston “The colonists were assembling to attack the troops… they surrounded the guard and threatened to execute… after a soldier was attacked he fired…”. This supports my claim because it proves that, both the troops and colonists were attacking each other, and the troops attacking the colonists was not a random decision.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Boston Massacre

    166 Words  | 1 Pages

    Finally, Samuel Gray, a patriot, was involved in a fight with a soldier the day before. This shows that it was a murder because the soldier involved in the fight

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: Self-Defense Or Self Defense?

    158 Words  | 1 Pages

    he infamous street fight that took place in Boston, Massachusetts is referred to as The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The riot started when a few young boys began to throw stones and rocks at British soldiers who were guarding the Customs House. The crowd around the boys started to grow larger and larger, and then people from the crowd begun to join the boys, throwing ice at the soldiers and taunting them. The soldiers then fired, killing five colonists.

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: The Cause Of The American Revolution

    764 Words  | 4 Pages

    There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Boston Massacre

    558 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

    Read More

  • The Boston Massacre: The Incident On King Street

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.

    Read More

More about The Boston Massacre: Murder Or Self Defense?

Open Document