The Boston Massacre: Provoked Self-Defense Or Justified Riot Met With Bloodshed

471 Words2 Pages

The Boston Massacre: Provoked Self-Defense or Justified Riot Met with Bloodshed
On March 5, 1770, a violent event occurred between British soldiers and angry patriots in
Boston, Massachusetts. Since the British military occupied Boston, tension had been rising among the people. Constant fights were reported between British soldiers and the people. The people of Boston were getting more violent. One day a mob of furious patriots, about 50, surrounded and attacked a British sentinel, hurling various objects such as snowballs, sticks, and clubs at the soldiers. Captain Preston, who wrote a personal account of the event, tried to diffuse the situation best by calling in more troops and reasoning with the mob. Nevertheless, the mob
continued …show more content…

Two named Samuel Maverick and Patrick Carr, died later. After the violent event, Captain Preston and his men were taken to court, defended by John Adams and
Josiah Quincy II, and two soldiers were found guilty of murder. This insane event led to the evacuation of the British army from Boston. Also, this event played a crucial role in initiating the
American Revolution.
I have never deeply studied the Boston Massacre, so I found the articles I read about the event extremely interesting. I did not know that the British sent their military into Boston. It now
Sorcinelli 2 makes sense to me why the people of Boston were so aggressive and agitated. The colonies were used to being self-governed during the 7 Years' War, and now they were suddenly being pushed around and ruled by the British. Reading the personal accounts was eye-opening, and interesting to hear exactly how it played out. It makes me very sad that the massacre led to the deaths of people, but I am overall grateful that it led to the American Revolution. I am learning how much death and sacrifice went into my freedom. Since reading the personal account of Captain

Open Document