The Caning Of Sumner In 1856

989 Words4 Pages
To begin with, the date of the Caning of Sumner occurred on May 22, 1856 This event occurred in thein the Senate Chambers Senator. What happened was that Charles Sumner of Massachusetts criticized pro-slavery people in Kansas and personally insulted pro-slavery senator from South Carolina, Andrew Pickens Butler. Representative Preston Brooks relative of Butler, had a responded strongly to his remarks about Butler. On May 22 of 1856, Brooks used a walking cane to beat up Sumner unconscious in the Senate chambers.The north’s reaction towards the Caning of Sumner was that they were outraged and called the attacker “Bully Brooks”.The south’s reaction towards this incident was that they were happy and dozens of southerners sent Brooks new canes.The…show more content…
Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state or a free state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress orchestrated a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas. The north’s reaction towards the MIssouri Compromise was that they condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of…show more content…
The Fugitive Slave Act was a newly passed law by Congress. It made it a crime to help runaway slaves and allowed officials to arrest those slaves in free areas. Slaves weren’t allowed to run away to free states. Slaveholders were allowed to take suspected fugitives to U.S. commissioners, who decide where their fate. People who hid or helped a runaway slave faced six months in jail and also had to face a 1,000 dollar fine. Thousands of northern African Americans fled to Canada in fear. The Fugitive Slave Act was one of the most controversial laws of the nineteenth century.This Act upset northerners, who were uncomfortable with the commissioner's power. Northerner’s also disliked the idea of trial and jury. The south’s reaction towards the Fugitive Slave Act was that it was good because they were able to get their slaves back. The aftermath of the Fugitive Slave Act was that many African Americans had to run away from the free states and had to go to Canada because slavery was outlawed. This act led to war because it was a very debatable topic throughout the north and the
Open Document