Imagine being a senior in the final year of high school--someone who plays sports, gets decent grades, and has many friends. Such a scenario is fairly common for many American students, as it was for eighteen year old Adnan Syed until he was arrested and charged with the murder of his ex-girlfriend. Syed’s case was relatively unknown beyond his local community; he was convicted and imprisoned. Then, a podcast called Serial came out, his story gained an incredible amount of attention, questions arose, and people started debating whether or not he really did commit murder. Despite the uncertainty that the podcast instigated among listeners, the evidence presented in the trial indicates Adnan Syed did, in fact, commit the murder and deserved his prison sentence. …show more content…
According to an article in Rolling Stone magazine, Syed’s guilt is clear due to incriminating evidence. Cell phone records indicate that on the night January 13, 1999, he was in the area where Lee’s body was located (McDonnell-Parry). Additionally, Jay Wilds, a primary witness and friend at the time, testified that on the day of Lee’s disappearance Adnan Syed was angry about his ex-girlfriend having started a new relationship with someone else and that he wanted to kill her (McDonnell-Parry). This reaction to her moving on further incriminated him because it gave him a motive to kill her (McDonnell-Parry). Through this evidence, the prosecuting attorneys presented a convincing argument against Adnan
This Reveals Syed Wrong actions as it connects with the timeline of the calls given by the AT&T records and thus proving Adnan Syed being responsible because the whole story is adding up and connecting to wilds story. Likewise, the testimonies of witnesses proves Syed to be guilty as charged, as it adds up to create a story that proves him as a criminal. In the crime scene 4 witnesses are interviewed or info is obtained from them. According to wilds, Pusateri and vinson, “Wilds contacted Pusateri and asked her to pick him up at the Westview Mall… then he told her that Syed killed Lee that afternoon and placed her in the trunk of her car… he returned to Vinson’s house for the rest of the evening... Vinson testified that Syed and Wilds stopped by her apartment around 6 pm” and According to McClain, McClain had written Syed a letter… reminding him that she … had seen him at the Woodlawn Public Library… before 3 p.m. on January 13.
Undisclosed and Serial, two podcasts, have made Adnan Syed’s case a public phenomenon. This case originated on January 13th, 1999. Hae Min Lee, a senior at Woodlawn High School, was found murdered and buried in Leakin Park about a month later. Adnan and Hae dated and had broken up shortly before the incident took place. This makes Adnan a main suspect in the investigation of her disappearance and murder.
Deirdre Enright, one professional who is helping investigate Syed’s case, says right off the bat that the state’s case against Adnan is ‘very thin.’ Deirdre Enright is the director of the University of Virginia School of Law's Project for Informed Reform and Center for Criminal Justice. Enright has worked with many cases to find if the convicted are truly guilty. Enright has come to the conclusion, if someone who is convicted is not guilty, they are the worst person to help prove their innocence. She explains this to Koenig; Koenig worries though that Syed might just be this charming sociopath, to which Enright replies, “The odds of you getting the charming sociopath, you’re just not that lucky.”
Of the three Adnan Syed was the one wrongfully convicted due to insufficient evidence and poor examination of all aspects of the case. Hae Min Lee was a senior in high school and the ex of Adnan Syed. Adnan had always been pleasant towards
Adnan Masud Syed, 19, was convicted of murder that sentenced him in prison for life on June 20, 2000. Mr. Syed was accused of strangling his ex girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, 18, and burying her body in Leakin Park on January 13th, 1999. The body was eventually uncovered and Adnan became the primary suspect after an anonymous call was made to the police a few weeks after the crime to investigate Adnan. The prosecutors had stated that Adnan’s motive of murdering Hae was because he was hurt and outraged when they broke up. To counter, the defense attorney had claimed that Adnan was an average American teen, incapable of murder, and he was an honors student at Woodlawn High School.
If a person murders someone and thinks they are guilty, why would there be so much evidence proving the opposite? Adnan Syed is guilty of Hae’s murder. On January 13, 1999 Hae Min Lee, a popular high school senior, disappeared and was found dead. Six weeks later, Adnan Syed, Hae’s ex-boyfriend, was found guilty of her murder. He claims to be innocent but there is evidence to prove that he was guilty.
The American criminal justice system, although normally adept, still has its flaws. In Sarah Koenig’s podcast Serial, she examines a case from 1999 in which a teenage boy, Adnan Syed, was charged with murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. The podcast, which brought attention to the flaws within the case presented, caused many listeners to question the validity of the verdict. There has been speculation across a wide variety of sources, and many feel as though Adnan Syed deserves an appeal. However, because there was enough evidence to convict Syed during the original case, there are those who believe the verdict should stand.
To be wrongfully convicted is an innocent man’s darkest nightmare. For Adnan Syed this nightmare happened to become his future. In Adnan Syed vs. People, the jury ruled in favor of the DA’s case. Nonetheless, supporters of Adnan haven’t stopped speculating on who actually holds the culpability. After analyzing the case, two main suspects appeared, Adnan’s best friend Stephanie and her boyfriend Jay.
This evidence supports my claim because if Adnan Syed was really at the library and Asia Mcclain really saw him at the library then investigators interfered with the possibility of having Asia testify for the jury. If Asia had testified for Adnan he would have had a fair chance of being innocent as much as he did being guilty. The second piece of evidence is the affidavit that Asia Mcclain wrote for the court stating that she was there at the library and did see Adnan at the library. Even when the plain proof was right in front of investigators they failed the chance of Adnan Syed’s
there is a lot of parts where they said that Adnan Syed is innocent, For example Because if he was in the library that equals innocent ,Asia says he’s innocent, i would says he’s innocent. “ Saad Chaudry thinks Adnan is innocent”. A lot of people made him look innocent which of course I believe he’s innocent. (S1.ep1.pg27.), (S1. ep6 .pg 108.)
Murder is a deplorable crime that leaves behind a trail of devastation and grief for the victim's loved ones. There are many motivations behind such a heinous act, making it hard to determine the criminal. The case of Adnan Syed, who was sentenced to killing his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee, focuses on the many possible reasons why a person would commit such a hateful act. Despite the concrete evidence that was never shown, a number of reasons could show what could have led Adnan to commit such a horrendous crime. One reason could be that Adnan was driven to kill Hae after she broke up with Adnan.
The evidence, though, doesn’t support that conviction; there wasn’t enough concrete evidence to unquestionably prove his guilt. Adnan Syed was unfairly convicted of the murder of Hae Min Lee. Through his trial, the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence to fully
Although a Baltimore, Maryland jury accused Adnan Syed guilty of the murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee; The question is did Maryland’s justice system accuse the wrong person of the crime. Adnan Syed was a student at Woodlawn High School. He was a much liked teenager by his peers. He made good grades, played school sports, and was an EMT. Adnan was a typical teenager who drank, smoked pot and kept secrets from his Muslim family heritage.
The State of Maryland. This case is highlighted by the podcast Serial, hosted by Sarah Koenig. Adnan is innocent because there is not enough physical and reliable witness evidence linking Adnan to the murder of Hae. Hae’s Lividity Hae’s lividity proves Adnan’s innocence by counterclaiming
Of course, many people think Adnan Syed is guilty of murdering Hae by contradicting himself, by saying, “I am in here for my own mistakes.” He might have been on the edge of confessing his guilt until Sarah caught this and asked what he meant, and quickly recovers from his mistake. Adnan also slips his tongue by saying that he wants people to only look at the evidence, and not his personality. If I were convicted of a crime I would certainly like to have my personality be looked at, if I were innocent. So they could see what good I have done.