ipl-logo

The Case Of Gregg V. Georgia

851 Words4 Pages

Gregg V Georgia
Background of the Case
Troy Gregg was found guilty and was charged in 1976, these charges included murder and armed robbery and he was sentenced to death. He murdered Fred Edward Simmons and Bob Durwood Moore. Fred and Bob gave Troy Gregg and another man a ride because Troy appeared to be hitchhiking. Gregg then shot both men and continued to rob them. After being caught by police he admitted to shooting the men, robbing, and stealing their car. Troy was found guilty and argued his case in front of the Supreme Court on March 31, 1976. Gregg thought that the death penalty was unfair and was a cruel and unusual punishment. Gregg used the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments to argue his stand against the ruling of the court.

Lower …show more content…

The issue in this case is whether the imposition of the sentence of death for the crime of murder under the law of Georgia violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Gregg argued that the sentencing procedure allows for arbitrary grants of mercy that reflects a misinterpretation and ignores the reviewing authority of the Georgia Supreme Court to determine whether each death sentence is proportional to other sentencing for similar crimes. Gregg was pleading for a life sentence instead of death.Georgia argued that the statute did not constitute a cruel and unusual punishment and did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Georgia also argued and proved that there must be specific jury findings as to the circumstances of the crime to determine whether the death sentence was fair for the case. Georgia argued that he committed the murder for the purpose of receiving the victims money and automobile. Georgia also argued and attempted to prove that the murder was “outrageously and wantonly …show more content…

Greggs v Georgia was decided on July 2, 1976. The only two judges who voted in favor of the Gregg case were William J. Brennan, Jr. and Thurgood Marshall. Both also ruled unconstitutional in similar cases. Warren E. Berber, Bryon R. White, Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell,Jr. William H. Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, and Sandra Day O’Connor all voted in favor of Georgia. Justice Stewart's majority opinion declares that the “punishment of death for the crime of murder does not, under the circumstances, violate the eighth and fourteenth amendments”. Justice Brennan stated “a punishment must not be so severe as to be degrading to human dignity”. Justice White wrote concurrent opinions and were also supported by Justices Burger, Rehnquist, and Blackmun, reiterated the defense of the Georgia statute by which Gregg v Georgia was

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Stinney Case

    458 Words  | 2 Pages

    The guilty verdict should be overturned, and George Stinney should be exonerated from the crime of murdering the two girls. The arresting of Stinney was a violation of Stinney’s 5th, 6th, 8th Amendment rights. George Stinney’s 5th Amendment rights were violated in many ways. There was no arrest warrant issued, there was no and jury and indictment. In the trial there was no witnesses to call to testify, nor was there physical evidence of Stinney beating the girls to death.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of Gregg V. Georgia

    379 Words  | 2 Pages

    Case Identification: 428 U.S. 153; 96 S. Ct. 2909; 49 L. Ed. 2d 859; No. 74-6257; Gregg v. Georgia. It was argued on March 31, 1976 and was decided on July 2, 1976. Facts: The defendant, Troy Gregg, sought the review of the decision from the Supreme Court of Georgia, which affirmed the opinion that the death penalty is not a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. Gregg was charged with armed robbery and murder.

    Read More

  • Georgia V. Gregg Case Study

    1054 Words  | 5 Pages

    Trisha Montoya Adju.102 Spring 2018- Case: Gregg vs Georgia. No. 74-6257 Argued 31Mar1976. Decided 02Jul1976. 428 U.S. 153. FACTS:

    Read More

  • Essay On Timothy Lee Hurst Murder

    404 Words  | 2 Pages

    Therefore, the trial court affirmed his first-degree murder conviction and his sentence to the death

    Read More

  • John Blair Pros And Cons

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    The new Supreme Court met on February 2, 1790 in New York. John Blair proved to be worthy to the justice but was based on his own opinions on the law, the constitution, and the legal precedents. John Blair most important principle during his tenure was the independence of the new Supreme Court and the right of the judicial review. During John Blair tenure they had a case that they heard about that was called “Chisholm vs. Georgia” in (1793), and it was over the fact of whether a state could or could not be sued by a citizen from another state. The new Supreme Court ruled four-to-one that a citizen that was from another state could sued another state bc states were subjected to lawsuits, with John Blair agreeing with the argument

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Troy Leon Gregg

    269 Words  | 2 Pages

    On November 24, 1973 Troy Leon Gregg was arrested for the robbery and murder of Fred Edward Simmons and Bob Durwood Moore. He killed the two men with a firearm, a .25-caliber automatic pistol after traveling with the two for quite some time. The bodies of the men were found in a drainage ditch and had wounds that pertained to the right temple and the back of the head. He was trailed and found guilty of both charges. The parties that were involved in the case were Gregg and the state of Georgia.

    Read More

  • Charlie Wright's Trial

    136 Words  | 1 Pages

    He accused Charlie Weems and Clarence Norris of raping Price and Bates. Despite him later claiming his statements were coerced, his own trial ended in eleven jurors voting for a death sentence and one seeking life in prison. He spent the next six years in jail without a retrial before finally

    Read More

  • Tom Robinson's Trial Research Paper

    713 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although two boys were sentenced to death. " Guilty...guilty...guilty...guilty..." (Chapter 21) But for Tom he didn't get his rape charges dropped because his verdict was guilty and he died before he got to go to a higher court and try to straighten things out. The Scottsboro boys got lucky that Ruby confessed. If she didn't, the boys probably would have all be sentenced to death.

    Read More

  • The Case Of Booth Vs. The State Of Maryland

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    He also acknowledged that by allowing the content of a victim impact statement to influence the jury could lead them to choose the death penalty for reasons which were irrelevant to the defendant's decision to kill. This diverted attention from the facts of the crime. Justice Powell determined that by introducing the emotionally-charged opinions of family members into the case would destroy the reasoned decision-making. This is critical in capital cases. The major factor, in this case, argued if the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution protected a defendant from cruel and unusual punishment.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Gregg V. Georgia Case

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was sentenced by the court to capital punishment, the legal process that allows state governments to execute prisoners who committed a serious crime. At the trial, the judge found guilty of the two murders and two counts of armed robbery. Gregg challenged the court’s decision because it violated his 8th and 14th amendments and was “cruel and unusual punishment”. On January 17, 1971, Furman was sentenced to the death penalty because of an accidental murder. Furman broke-in to a house while robbing the house, the owner woke up and Furman started to run out of the house when all of a sudden his weapon dropped and discharged and killed the homeowner.

    Read More

  • Hypocrisy Of Murder In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

    655 Words  | 3 Pages

    But in this case, no,” which firmly shows a sense of forethought and a belief that the perpetrators’ deaths are valid and just (273). If this is the attitude of the jurors themselves, then this conviction is done in contradiction to the values that the American justice system itself values above all

    Read More

  • What Is The Case Of Furman Vs Georgia

    877 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court came back with a decision six months later with a 5-4 decision. This meant that 5 judges were for the death penalty and 4 were against. Justices Douglass, Brennan, Stewart, White and Marshal all concurred that executing Furman was wrong. Justices Burger, Blackmun, Powell, and Rehnquist all voted that the execution was the correct action to take against Furman. The court’s decision was that giving Furman the death penalty was cruel and unusual and in clear violation of the constitution.

    Read More

  • Why Was Texas Vs Johnson Important

    1605 Words  | 7 Pages

    When he argued that it was freedom of speech the highest court, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. When the Supreme Court heard the case they made the same decision as the lower courts. The decision ended up being 5-4 Johnson. Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, and Kennedy ruled that Gregory Lee Johnson was protected under the first amendment. They felt Johnson was protected because he has the right of freedom of speech and the act of expressive conduct.

    Read More

  • The Case Of State Of Georgia V. Marcus Dixon

    954 Words  | 4 Pages

    State of Georgia V. Marcus Dwayne Dixon (2003) Marcus Dixon was a highly recruited high school football player. His life suddenly took a tragic turn when he was falsely convicted of raping a 15 year old girl. The elements around his false conviction could have been avoided with some reform to the criminal justice courts system. Dixon initially had many charges against him but were narrowed down to statutory rape and aggravated child molestation. There was much racial disparity surrounding the jury on Dixon’s case, in that the county that Dixon committed his “crime” was a predominantly white population.

    Read More

  • Georgia Case Brief Of Guegg Vs Gregggia

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    Context and Constitutional Question Gregg v. Georgia is a court case that started with the “prosecution for a double murder committed in the course of a robbery”(Coenen, 2004). It was a court case among many others involving the issue of the death penalty. The constitutional question that gave Gregg v. Georgia importance was whether “the imposition of the death sentence prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as ‘cruel and unusual’ punishment?”(Gregg v. Georgia). The case was basically about if the death penalty violates the 8th and 14th amendment of the constitution because it can be viewed as a punishment that is too cruel or severe, as killing someone over a crime is unusual to some extent. This was the main question of the

    Read More

More about The Case Of Gregg V. Georgia

Open Document