The Case Of Jeffrey Angstadt Vs. Staples Contract And Commercial, Inc.
As I mentioned earlier not everyone is aware of what The Family and Medical Leave Act is, what the law is for, and how it can be or should be used when they should if the company where they work employs more than 50 people. By law employers are supposed to inform all employees about FMLA. In the case of Jeffrey Angstadt verses Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc. Angstadt was wrongfully fired because he did not know about the FMLA and could not balance his work responsibilities and taking care of his ill wife. In Columbia, South Carolina in September of 2010 and many months after, Jeffrey Angstadt, a furniture sales executive, told his employer which was Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc., a subsidiary of Staples, Inc., that he needed to …show more content…
Jeffrey Angstadt met all of the legal requirements to request FMLA and had every right to get the settlement that he did. He started working for Staples in March of 2007, it was not until September of 2010 that he informed his employer that his wife was extremely sick and need time off. At this point is when Angstadt should have been informed by his manager about FMLA and the proper steps to take in order to protect his job because he have been working at Staple already for 3 years, Staples employees well over 50 people, and his wife was medically verified as seriously ill. In addition to that, Angstadt worked for Staples for another two years before he was fired. As a whole Staples, Inc. and Staples Contract and Commercial, Inc. broke the law for not telling employees about FMLA once they was hired and also not having at least one poster about the act anywhere in the workplace. The Department of Labor noticed that Angstadt was wrongfully fired and came to his rescue. This case is a perfect reason why I believe that The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) do what it is intended to …show more content…
Most of the time, these types of surgeries are covered by the employees insurances company but these insurance companies do not always cover the entire bill or when they due they do not cover the stay in the hospital that the patient will need. In a situation like this that additional pay that the FMLA would provide, will help that person out with either hospital bill or everyday items such as food, toiletries, or even their phone bill. Similar to a stress free mother coming back to work, the employee that just underwent surgery will be not only glad to return but more will to stay at the company
Case Study: Seasons Hospice Vs. California, Inc.
337 Words | 2 PagesAn overtime class action lawsuit was filed against a California hospice and palliative care group known as Seasons. The lawsuit includes allegations that the defendants, Seasons Hospice and Palliative Care Group of California, Inc. refused to pay the plaintiffs in the case appropriate overtime pay as required by labor law. In addition, plaintiffs claim that the hospice and palliative care group failed to offer required rest periods and meal breaks as outlined in the California Labor Code. Basic overtime wages for non-exempt employees of Seasons Hospice and Palliative Care of California, Inc. are not in question/are not in dispute.
Business Law: The Starkist Tuna Case
118 Words | 1 PagesStarkist Co. accused of under filling their five ounce cans of tuna agreed to a settlement arrangement. Although the company denies the charges, all parties reached a settlement claiming they were simply avoiding legal expenses and other perils associated with class-action lawsuits. If you purchased Starkist Tuna between February 19, 2009 and October 31, 2014 you should follow the protocol to claim your part of the settlement. Class members must be residents of the U.S.A. and willing to swear online or on paper under penalty of perjury that they did purchase at least one five ounce can of the tuna products listed in the suit.
Fmla Leave Case Summary
1454 Words | 6 PagesBloom informs clinic of her pregnancy HealthPartners employed Jennifer Bloom as a certified medical assistant at Coon Rapids Clinic from 2004 until 2012. Before her termination, she used FMLA leave twice for the birth of her two children. In March 2012, Bloom learned that she was pregnant with her third child.
Sunbeam Television Corporation V Mitzel Case Summary
1176 Words | 5 PagesSunbeam Television Corporation v. Marilyn A. Mitzel Broadcast journalist Marilyn A. Mitzel won her court case against the Sunbeam Television Corporation and received a substantial amount of compensation, about $1 million in reparations (House 1). Mitzel believed the television station in which she worked, WSVN Fox 7 discriminated against her age when she was fired in 2005. Her career as a news anchor reporting for WSVN-TV began in 1988 and lasted for 17 years on a contract-basis (Sunbeam v. Mitzel). Every two or three years, her contracts would be renewed under the sole license of Sunbeam until February of 2005. The Sunbeam corporation had the power to program, future and present broadcasts as predetermined by the contracts.
Williamson Vs Houston
822 Words | 4 Pages8. Principle of Law: The court states, the first of the City’s contentions is easily dismissed. The jury found that Bozeman had notice of the harassment, and it is well established that we must accept a jury’s factual finding if it is supported by substantial evidence. The City’s second claim—that as a matter of law Bozeman’s knowledge should not have been imputed to the City—poses a more significant question concerning the limits of potential liability under Title VII. This court has noted that “the type and extent of notice necessary to impose liability on an employer under Title VII are the subject of some uncertainty.”
Case: Lachance Vs Erickson
184 Words | 1 PagesName of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.
Court Case Of Drake And Keeler
753 Words | 4 PagesEmployees are not necessary required to prove the employer or supervisor with an opportunity to resolve the complaint or grievance prior to engaging in a concerted and protected activity action (Holley, Jennings, & Wolters, 2012). In an article by the Duane Morris Institute, it provided several instances where the National Labor Relations Board was successful in getting discharged employees, like Keeler and Drake, reinstated employment with full back pay and/or settlement. One case reported employees were discharged from walking off the job in protest of a change in work rules, similar to Drake and Keeler (Redeker,
Boca Raton Case Study
372 Words | 2 PagesHowever, even though the city tried reversing the case and argued that the managers were acting accordingly to their activities, the courts’ panel recognized an affirmative defense to liability, even where the supervisors created the tortious environment. In order for the company to protect itself against the claim the defense required a showing of first, as stated on the
Case Study: Drake And Keeler
578 Words | 3 PagesBecause Drake and Keeler employer meets the required standards for coverage under the LMRA through engaging in interstate commerce, the specific employee right protected by section 7 of the LMRA is that they have been wrongfully dismissed of their duties because of their protected and concerted activities. Sec. 7. [§ 157.] of LMRA offers protection to employees rights to self-organization, to be able to form, join or help labor organization to bargain collectively through various representations of their own choosing and also to engage in various concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid protection and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all of such activities except for actions that are
Ms. Eifert Case Summary
321 Words | 2 PagesMr. Kurtz: The Union Understands that Ms. Eifet was a probationary employee and her termination under Article 5 Section 2 cannot be disputed. What I'm seeking here is clarification about her termination and hope you could provide that, the case as I know it is as follows: On or about 3/8/18 Ms. Eifert filed a complaint with her supervisor Alika Gaceta with a response from Mr. Hartman on 4/6/18 explaining that there was not enough evidence to sustain the allegations of her complaint. Ms. Eifert then filed the complaint with your office with the understanding that she would have a reply on or about the first week in May.
Unit 5 Bereavement
547 Words | 3 PagesWhen I asked Robert Hoffman to start at 5:00 a.m. to avoid the harassment fromMichael Niehenke and Donna Myers requested denied. C. When Harry Feals and I work together we have Julie Godzik, Robert Godzik, Brain Weaver and Michael Niehenke . These employees have stared at us until Mr. Franicola come after they called him Other employees are aloud to work together 8. Of the Persons in the same, or similar situation as you who was treated worse than you? Harry Feals Maintenance # 1 Harry Feals Maintenance #1 Mr. Feals received 11 weeks of Work for false allegation filed on pitt alert line, now he is seeking professional health with counseling to help cope with working at Pitt at Greensburg. .
Managed Care Research Paper
1163 Words | 5 PagesThese laws directly govern payers or regulate the employers that contract with payers to administer their benefits plan and the health care providers that provide services to the organization. The federal requirements affect almost all aspects of managed care and payer operations including standards for how insurance coverage must be provided to individuals and employers, provisions affecting health benefits and group health plans, tax preferences for individual and group health coverage, and protections for health information. Many of the consumer protections already passed at the state level are now being debated at the federal level. Congress has shown its willingness to intervene in the area of quality health care by passing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)
Family Medical Leave Act
440 Words | 2 PagesThe FMLA history dates back to the mid to late 1900s for the fair and equal treatment of pregnant women and employees with medical disabilities having the inability to fulfill their duties at work preventing employers from using those adverse situations
St. Mary's Honor Center Vs. Hicks Civil Rights Case Study
2294 Words | 10 PagesEventually, Hicks was demoted from his shift commander position back to a correctional officer and then fired. It was stated that Hicks was fired due to the fact that he threatened a supervisor during an argument. One can see that events seemed to be following one after another. Therefore, Hicks filed a suit that outlined the events leading to his termination as violating his rights an American worker. He felt as if the events leading to his unemployment came as a basis of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Dismissal Case Study: Paddy V. Starbucks
601 Words | 3 PagesCase Description In the case of Paddy v. Starbucks 2008, the plaintiff was terminated without notice at Starbucks, where he had worked as a National Account Manager, Business Development for 14.5 years. The case amounted to wrongful dismissal which was awarded based on a 14-month notice period, without further deduction for mitigation opportunities. It was held that the company should pay damages to the plaintiff to obtain replacement long-term disability coverage in addition to extended and basic medical and life insurance coverage, as well as non-salary financial income components, such as
More about The Case Of Jeffrey Angstadt Vs. Staples Contract And Commercial, Inc.
Case Study: Seasons Hospice Vs. California, Inc.
337 Words | 2 PagesBusiness Law: The Starkist Tuna Case
118 Words | 1 PagesFmla Leave Case Summary
1454 Words | 6 PagesSunbeam Television Corporation V Mitzel Case Summary
1176 Words | 5 PagesWilliamson Vs Houston
822 Words | 4 PagesCase: Lachance Vs Erickson
184 Words | 1 PagesCourt Case Of Drake And Keeler
753 Words | 4 PagesBoca Raton Case Study
372 Words | 2 PagesCase Study: Drake And Keeler
578 Words | 3 PagesMs. Eifert Case Summary
321 Words | 2 PagesUnit 5 Bereavement
547 Words | 3 PagesManaged Care Research Paper
1163 Words | 5 PagesFamily Medical Leave Act
440 Words | 2 PagesSt. Mary's Honor Center Vs. Hicks Civil Rights Case Study
2294 Words | 10 PagesDismissal Case Study: Paddy V. Starbucks
601 Words | 3 Pages