The Napa Valley Register recently published an article on the hearing for the expulsion of Napa High School football player Johnny Torres. Torres, accused of, “dragging another player through the locker room and helping hold him down while the victim was groped and penetrated by other players,” was not described in the article as a rapist, nor as someone participating in the sexual assault of another individual, but instead, became the all-too familiar character of the goody-goody athlete with not a spot on his record. What is also very apparent in the article is the clear tip-toeing around what Torres and other players have been accused of, which as far as we can tell from the Register’s cryptic concealment, is gang rape. This behavior by both Torres’s family, who requested that the expulsion hearing be made public, and by the media, which in the case of the Register seems to be garnering sympathy for Torres and pulling attention from the heinous …show more content…
Turner was sentenced to a mere 6 months in prison, and then was released after three months. This is the kind of society we live in, and the Register’s apologism and obscuration is simply a symptom of this. On the evening prior to International Women’s Day, it is important to note that even though Torres’s victim was not a woman, it is precisely the same atmosphere of victim blaming and apologism that allows those like Turner to walk free while countless violent and revolting violent and sexual crimes are committed against women and non-men. Rape culture and patriarchy are omnipresent in the capitalist white supremacist society, manifesting itself in violent acts such as these daily as well as in harassment and oppression of women and non-men. There are likely many other victims of this hazing behavior, and it is likely we will never hear their
In “Crime and Punishment: The saga of Richie Parker” published in Sports Illustrated, Gary Smith helps to explain just how many people are affected by a single sexual assault case. He does this in a very unique style by giving 12 sections explaining the incident from different points of view and the effects of a single crime. One person affected was Jill Agostino, the sports copy editor for Newsday. Her unnamed colleague had given her a copy of an article he was writing on Richie Parker and called asking if she liked it. Little did he know, stories like his were keeping her up at night, reminding her of the time she was raped nine years earlier.
Later, Briles recruited two of the players after they had already been kicked off the football team. There was evidence that Briles along with other members of the program let the teammates rape girls. They never disciplined, never told anyone, but the word got out. When a female athlete came up to Briles and mentioned that she had been raped by one of the football players Briles chose not to tell any of the higher-ups and to just let it go. The girl didn’t want to report it to the police so she only told Briles and her coach about the situation.
As a journalist, Peterson’s job is to report the facts, not give his unsolicited opinion on the situation. This is also dangerous because, not only is he shaming the victim’s personal choice to remain silent but he is also forcing his own beliefs on readers who are simply trying to become more familiar with the scandal. By reading about his personal opinions within the article, Peterson demonstrates a lack of empathy for anyone who has dealt with sexual abuse and as a result, readers may find that his argument is unable to sound
In the January 29, The Stanford Daily editorial Stanford, California, it debates the different essential of the principle of morality and identified Brock Turner had applied a use of force in raping an unconscious woman behind the dumpster. Furthermore, the young man attended Stanford University and participated in his college swim team dreamt of partaking in the Olympus. The victim heartfelt statement during the trial is disregarded because he comes from a class of privilege and is a man. Not to mention, Brock Turner’s father wrote a letter to expressing the universalizability to court saying, “my son’s life shouldn’t be ruined over 20 minutes of action (Dreher,Rod).” Therefore, Aaron Persky who is a California judge implemented an ethical decision that contemplated the clarity around both the specific choice and decision then declared a six months sentenced ruling.
The possible biases in jury decision-making will be discussed, including those related to having a celebrity on trial. In addition, this paper will examine the taboo nature of sexual assault cases, the problems that often arise in such cases, and the psychological toll on the victim. One issue with this case is the prosecution’s lack forensic evidence. In a “he said, she said” case that lacks the evidence that jurors expect in order to make their decision, it comes down to whether they believe the defendant or the prosecution. When DNA is not available, other types of physical evidence are examined (LaPorte, G., Nguyen, M., Schwarting, D., Scott, F., Waltke, H., Weiss, D., 2017).
Many people look up to Pedro Martinez because he is a legendary figure in Major League Baseball. He is best recognized for his amazing pitching skills and his motivational charitable work. Pedro Martinez, one of the most successful Major League Baseball pitchers of all time and had humble beginnings in a stage of his career. According to JE Richters and PE Martinez’s 1993 Development and Psychopathology study article, Martinez began his professional baseball career in the Los Angeles Dodgers organization in 1988. Martinez was a great pitcher from the beginning, but because of his little size he stood barely more than five feet tall and was first ignored.
The only message being relayed is that its “acceptable” to sexually assault someone and not have to pay the full price for the action. This is what was trying to be avoided by lawyers, students at Stanford, and individuals all of the United States. Many people wanted to see Brock Turner face up to years in
Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals that the victim is important and the fact that Brock Turner sexually assaulted her should not be disregarded just because he was a great student and athlete. Dan Turner blames the partying culture of college for his son’s behavior but in reality, there is no excuse for sexual
This shows that the institution of sexual assault and trials as a lot of white women privilege. The stereotype of sexual assault victim is a white woman which is in reality not realistic. The gymnastic case shows that all types of people were sexually assaulted, it also showed that not everyone testified in the trail. The lack of testimonies from black women and men continue the stereotype which continues a vicious cycle of the institution of assault and criminal justice system. White privilege continues to influence how sexual assault is experience and resolved with which puts women in a negative
Brock Allen Turner, shares the story of 19 year old, Stanford swimmer, Brock Turner and his heinous crime of sexual assault on multiple accounts towards Emily Doe. The assailant pleaded innocent throughout his trial, however, throughout his interview his linguistics told a different story. While speaking with authority, he failed to “directly acknowledge her, this deflecting his responsibility to her for his action, essentially erasing the victim from the description of the event.” Which continues to prove his guilt in the case. “While these charges can carry up to fourteen years in prison, Brock Turner served just three months in a county jail”.
Larry Nassar was a well-known, and highly respected, 54-year-old physician that treated the US women Olympic gymnast team and worked at Michigan State University. He was found guilty of sexually harassing over 150 women throughout his career and was sentenced to serve 175 years in prison, ensuring that the rest of his life would be spent behind bars, by Judge Rosemarie Aquilina on Monday, February 5th, 2018. A total of 156 victims (Grinberg, 2018) read their impact statements over the course of a week in front of the court; Nassar was made to listen, and realize the destruction he caused in the lives of countless individuals. When we analyze the factors that enabled Nassar’s sexual abuse and general misconduct to continue for nearly two decades,
“While there was no real evidence to support a charge of gang rape, the hysterical atmosphere surrounding the trial insured their conviction.” The nine boys were tried in court several times, with several public offenders and lawyers who did not put much effort into the
It was September 20th, 2001, nine days after the terrorist attack of 9/11 happened and military soldiers were getting prepared to go on the hunt for the terrorist that caused this attack. John, one of the soldiers, was getting ready for departure when he was alerted by the general that he had a phone call. John had rarely received calls as most of his friends and family a disconnected. There was only one person John was close to and that was is wife. John answered the call to find it was his wife and she said that she felt that she was in danger and needed John’s assistance.
There were claims on the Manton case study that Dixon had prior history of engaging in sexual activity at his high school, which led Dixon to be suspended twice for the prior sexual acts. At the time of this incident, Dixon was 18 years old, and the “victim” was 15 (Manton, 2005). Following this factual information, Dixon at that time claimed that the sexual act was consensual and accused the girl of fabricating the story because of fear of her parents finding out and punishing her for sleeping with a black man (Manton, 2005). Several charges were suggested for Dixon which included: statutory rape, aggravated child molestation, rape, sexual battery, false imprisonment, and aggravated assist (Manton, 2005). Dixon was then acquitted of a majority of the charges and found Dixon guilty of statutory rape and aggravated child molestation (Manton,
The Pennsylvania State University Jerry Sandusky Child Molestation case shed light on to a long line of horrific acts of sexual abuse and corruption within college football. Jerry Sandusky was an assistant football coach alongside the iconic football coach, Joe Paterno. While Sandusky was not brought to trial until 2012, reports of Sandusky sexually molesting football players and young boys date back to 1994 (Chappell, 2012). This was not through lack of acknowledgement; many of Sandusky’s victims came forwarded and reported the assaults to campus police, the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, head coach Joe Paterno, the senior Vice President, and the Penn State Athletic Director. Penn State’s blatant cover up of abuse allegations is worrisome and cannot be tolerated.