I believe Lt. Kaffee shouldn’t keep the case about Lance corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey. Firstly, if Lt. Kaffee gives his case to another lawyer, they will surely lose the case. Due to all the evidence and information that is against Corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey ensures that they have committed the crime. Due to their actions they will be charged for First degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and Conduct Unbecoming a United States Marine, which will lead to at least 20 years in jail. A basic argument from another lawyer would be that Corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey were ordered to by Lt. Kendrick to do “code red” on Pfc. Santiago, but that argument would lead to Corporal Dawson, Pfc. Downey, Lt. Kendrick and Colonel Jessop being charged as well. This ending would …show more content…
Downey were willing to accept the charges and consequences of their actions because it was in the name of their “code”. Why should they be defended if they are willing to accept the consequences for their actions? They believe in their code which is Unit Corps God Country, their priorities are in the order they are written (unit is the most important). Someone in a rank above them ordered them to do something they will do it no matter what because their beliefs are surrounded by their code. In the movie there is a scene where Lance Corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey were offered to go to prison for 6 months compared to 12 years, and they refused it. Their reasoning was that they would much rather accept their full punishment rather than dishonor their unit, and the corps. There is no reason for Lance Corporal Dawson and Pfc. Downey to have a lawyer if they accept the charges! Lastly, if Lt. Kaffee were to stay he would be risking multiple things! If Lt. Kaffee enters court- his first court- and loses, it will severely damage his reputation as a lawyer; that could lead to people no longer giving him jobs because they don’t trust that he will do well in
In this case, Sergeant Randy Baker from Tulia, Texas Police Department attempted to make to arrest an individual that he knew had an arrest warrant out for him. The individual Sergeant Baker was trying to arrest was Israel Leija, Jr. When Leija was confronted by Sergeant Baker he took off in his vehicle. Sgt. Baker, Trp.
February 23, 1983 a man walked into a house with no good intention but to burglarize it. Home during all this was Jeanine Nicarico who was home alone resting because she had the flu. She was taken from her home and raped two days later she was found dead. Jeanine was only 10 years old. The only clue left at the crime scene was a boot print.
Moses Reed (Ross) was punished today for deserting us. We are stopped because of Sergeant Floyd 's illness. He told a few of us a plan but we never believe he would actually do it. It was only after one of the men told me Reed had left his knife at our last camp destination fhat I really became suspicious. Apparently Reed went to Captain Lewis and Lewis sent Lay liberty, a Frenchman, to go with him.
The prosecutor's dilemma refers to the fact the District Attorneys and prosecutors are elected officials who must appeal to their constituents and the public ideals so that they can continue being elected; however, this sometimes interferes with the official role of the District Attorney which is to seek justice in the courtroom by the rules of the law. Nifong was running for District Attorney, and knew that if he prosecuted those lacrosse players in such a high-profile case, this would likely be the edge he needed to win his election. In attempt to appeal to his voters, Nifong stretched the truth and withheld evidence as to bolster his case and make him look stronger. Not to mention, if he had brought the lab findings forward, he would have had to admit that he had been wrong throughout the entire case thus far,, which would look bad politically. So, rather than admitting he was wrong, Nifong pursued the case even further to further his political interests, which detracted from his more important goal of seeking justice and truth.
The advance procedure is relied upon to be extensive and petulant. A choice from the investigative court is not likely until at any rate the spring of 2001, and after that, it is plausible that one side will engage the state Supreme Court. On the off chance that the advances fall flat, the main chance Kip has for an existence out of jail will be a compensation of his sentence by the senator, in the event that he can demonstrate that he is restored, has gave penance for his wrongdoing and didn 't really represents a risk to society. Such replacements are to a great degree uncommon, particularly in cases including emotional
During the prosecution, Dax stood up for the three soldiers by aggressively protesting the charges made against the men. Therefore, Colonel Dax was comfortable with the concept
Bob and the socs attacked Johnny and Ponyboy first, Ponyboy and Johnny could attack them in any shape or form. If Johnny and Ponyboy made the first move that is manslaughter but they did not make the first move. If Bob and the socs killed Ponyboy and Johnny that is manslaughter. Bob had no right to touch Johnny and Ponyboy and if Bob said he touch Johnny and Ponyboy talked to their women would never hold up in court and if it did the judge is not smart at all. Also Johnny, Ponyboy, and Two-bit was not in the socs turf but Bob and Randy was on our
Platoon Argumentative Essay If you’ve ever had an ethical dilemma related to upholding the Army Values, let me first warn you that this will not be your last ethical dilemma. Second, let me provide you with purpose, direction, and motivation to uphold the Army’s Standards to influence your decision. During the Vietnam War prompting this question to a second lieutenant may have been challenging due to little interest in prosecuting Vietnam war crimes.
Situation Analysis: Coach P, the coach of the Army Crew team for the United States Military Academy at West point was in a dilemma on the selection of Varsity and Junior Varsity crew while the crew season was coming to an end in May 2002 with just one week before the commencement of the National Championship race wherein over 100 schools were expected to compete. With his vast experience of nine years of coaching and selection of the top eight rowers based on long series of objective tests measuring individual strength, technique and endurance using the ergometer machine, which had helped him in producing consistent result of creating a winning team, he is now faced with a situation of his best eight rowers team- Varsity consistently losing
Sexual Assault: Breaking the Trust Sexual Assault is a problem that has and continues to affect all branches of the military today. The military’s way of addressing sexual assault differs from the civilian authorities’ way of handling sexual assault. But while civilians are tried by a judge in civilian courts, active duty military personnel normally face charges by the court-martial process.
As a nineteen-year-old Canadian soldier from the start, Robert is seen transitioning through an existential crisis, encountering with nothingness to embracing the depths of life. In relation to Findley’s text when Robert enters the war, he is told by his mother that metaphorically put on a new set of attire to toughen up psychologically, emotionally, or physically to face the inevitable everyday battles of war he has to fight by making sacrifices with the unexpected challenges that come up in the future. This can be seen when Robert commands all soldiers to “hold their torn pieces of cloth in their hand[...] ‘piss on them’[...] the ammonia in their urine would turn the chlorine into harmless crystals that could not be breathed” (Findley, 126). Ideally, this was the steps he
“Trap trap trap duck down don't go! Spencer heard the first ping like the break of a light bulb and one simple buzz. Spencer had realised he had made a huge mistake he was out in front a good target.” (Hughes 151). There are many similarities and differences between dieter and Spencer.
Compare and Contrast of Soldier’s Heart and Red Badge of Courage. While the stories Red Badge of Courage and Soldier’s Heart are both excellent stories in themselves, the similarities between the two causes one to wonder if plagiarism is at hand. The few contrasts between the two novellas help to tell two different tales of the same grisly, glory filled war. However, the contrasts fall short, leaving many to believe that Soldier’s Heart may not be as an original and creative story of war as it may seem.
In the poem, “What Every Soldier Should Know”, Brian Turner, details the ever-present threat of death in a war zone. This poem expesses not only the terror of the American soldiers, but also exemplifies the emotions that the Middle Eastern soldiers feel towards the American soldiers. The soldiers are experiencing death, chaos, and disorder, but for some of the middle eastern people, they experience that every day. A lot of Middle Eastern people are normal people, defending their home land, their family, and their country.
As leaders, it is important to communicate our priorities and values so that every Soldier knows what is expected. Reading and absorbing this philosophy will give you a solid ground for what is expected from you and what you can expect from me. Rely on the Army values to help you make good decisions. In particular, remember the following values: • Integrity: Having integrity is, to me, one of the most important Army values. Having integrity means you do what is right even when no one else is around.