In a predominantly black high school, Freddie Watts is the principal and Jimmy Brothers is the assistant principal. They are both African American administrators. During a heated conversation between the two administrators and Ann Griffin, a white tenured teacher. Griffin stated that she “hated all black folks.” After the conversation there was word that spread among their colleagues which are both black and white. It caused negative reactions throughout because of her statement. Mr. Watts, the principal recommended Mrs. Griffin’s dismissal based on concerns regarding her ability to treat students fairly and her judgment and competency as a teacher. Rogelynn Emory v. Memphis City Schools Board of Education (2017) is the case presented is …show more content…
Griffin for dismissal. In the case of Rogelynn Emory v. Memphis City Schools Board of Education (2017) the court ruled that Mrs. Emory should be dismissed from teaching because it was ruled that she was not an effective or competent teacher. There were instances where the administrators knew Mrs. Emory had trouble with classroom management. There was sufficient evidence and testimony that showed Mrs. Emory lacked some things to be an efficient teacher. For Mrs. Griffins there is enough concerns of judgment, treatment of students, and competency based on her heated conversation because it created negative reactions among the people that heard about this conversation. This would create a lot of problems throughout the school. However, the case of Mrs. Griffin while it does have some similarities to Emory there is not enough evidence to say that Mrs. Griffin is already a bad and inefficient teacher. There would have to be sufficient evidence that Mrs. Griffin was not be an effective teacher to the point where her students would suffer the most. There would have to be more information presented to dismiss her. Mrs. Griffin is a tenure teacher which provides her a level of protection to unjust dismissal. Such as in the case of Vergara v. California (2014) where to the court ruled for the teacher rights and tenure. Mr. Watts concerns about the teacher’s judgment, treatment of students fairly and her competency would be a great starting point for the case but there would need to be more information for a court to uphold her
The Tinker versus Des Moines Independent school court case was a case that started in a local school in Iowa. Mary Beth Tinker was a thirteen year old at Des Moines Independent school. She and a small group of students were unsettled about the Vietnam war. In an attempt to speak out against the war and voice their opinions about it the students wore black armbands to school. It was a peaceful, harmless, and innocent protest.
The issue before the court was the question, “Was her Fourth Amendment right violated by school
The ten students were suspended at Central High School in Columbus, Ohio. The principal was the first to hear about this and decided to suspend them without reason. The parents of the students were outraged for not getting an explanation. Furthermore, the Ohio law entitled the school principal
May it Please the Court, The Court case Alex v. Upper Arlington School District, a student named Alex refused to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance in the early hours of school. He was told countless times by teachers to stand for the flag. Alex refused and was sent to the office and received a suspension for insubordination. This action violated Alex’s First Amendment rights, going against his freedom of speech and religion.
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, specific interpretations of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment were applied in reaching a decision by the Supreme Court. On December 16, 1945, three public school students attended school in the Des Moines Independent Community School District wearing black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. The school board of this district had written a policy prohibiting this just 2 days before after hearing that there could be possible protests. The school board forbade any students to protest the Vietnam War in fear that this would disrupt the school day.
Oklahoma has done many things for the civil rights movement in the way of lawsuits, peaceful protests, and public servants’ work. It is surprising and refreshing to think that a state that was so segregated and generally backward on issues relating to race could have so many advocates for civil rights. This is probably due to people feeling that they needed to rise to the occasion and fix these injustices in their state. In the late days of segregation, the NAACP was of increasing prominence and as a result, it was able to launch several incredibly successful and revolutionary lawsuits.
WaiTo Wong Polsc 1 Prof. Uranga 8/7/2014 Was Brown v Board decided correctly? Back in 1950s', African American children were rejected admission to normal public schools which are attended by white children, under laws requiring or allowing segregation towards to the races. Linda Brown who is the main character in this event, she was born in Topeka, Kansas. Despite the fact she grew up in a ethnically diverse neighborhood, she was still forced to go to a school which need an hour time to reach instead of going to a school which was four blocks away from her house. Back at that time Topeka's schools are being segregated by races.
Gregg v. Georgia 1976 Constitutional Question: Is the death penalty constitutional, or is it a violation of his 8th and 14th amendment rights? Background Information: In 1976, a man named Gregg was tried and and found guilty for the murder of two people. After his trail he was sentenced to death.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette is a Supreme Court case related to civil liberties whose ruling answered the question, "Is a compulsory flag-salute for public schoolchildren a violation of the First Amendment?" According to a precedent case (Minersville School District v. Gobitis) with the exact same circumstances as the Barnette case, there is no violation. However, the Supreme Court completely reverses the Gobitis ruling through the Barnette ruling. In 1942, the West Virginia State Board of Education enacted a rule after the decision on the Gobitis case, requiring students to salute the flag; refusal to do so was treated as insubordination and was punishable by expulsion and charges of delinquency.
However, supporters of the case were persistent, so the case was brought back before the judge, and he agreed, seeing that there was no way they would let this go until a real trial took place. While in court, several witnesses were interrogated for the case of the young man, including middle school principal Mary Podlesny, high school principals William Davis and Tom Blauert, one of the main tormentors Roy Grande, and Nabozny himself. Most of the witnesses supported the young man’s case by explaining the relentless bullying and how nobody took action. However, Mrs. Podlesny still denied having any knowledge of the bullying, which was a very stupid move since both Roy Grande and his mother recalled her being present at a meeting about the situation at Ashland Middle School. When Roy was brought from prison to be questioned, he was truthful about everything he did to make Nabozny’s time at school miserable.
Coming upon my junior year of high school, educational decisions by the Jefferson County School board was slowly coming to an issue throughout the whole district. Many parents, students, and community supporters were frowning upon a particular group of people within the board that had put teachers and students at a disadvantage in education. They were re-evaluating teachers and their income for their own benefit. Teachers would be subsequently be sacrificing a chunk of their income and their work they put into the school, so that the board members and even the superintendent would have an extra raise in their salary. Along that, they were putting pressure on school administration to be tougher on students and that also inevitably made their
Professor Paul Douglas asked this question at the 1929 AFT national convention, “allowed to be determined by vaudeville promoters, and real estate agents, and lawyers, and bankers, every interest in the community sitting on school boards, except teachers?” Professor Paul Douglas who later will the the Senator from Illinois, was very upset with teachers were getting treated compared to similar jobs. The school boards went out of their way and into their employees’ lives. They fired teachers for not attending church, failing to vote, or not attending local parades. Also a couple of school boards fired women teachers for wearing the wrong clothing, having the wrong hairstyle, being over the age of forty, and sometimes for getting married.
They were all suspended without being given a hearing prior to their suspension, or they weren’t given a hearing within a reasonable time after their suspension. Federal court mandated that the suspensions of the students be removed from their cumulative record. The Columbus Public School System and school board appealed the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the due process clause of the 14th amendment had been violated. SCOTUS ruled 5-4 in favor of the students of the Columbus Public School
From the website, Encyclopedia Britannica article Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, I found that the court case Board of Education vs. Rowley is about a deaf student named Amy Rowley who lived in New York and attended a public school. Her parents approached the administration in the school at the beginning of Rowley kindergarten year explaining that their daughter would need an aid to sign to her while the teacher was teaching. The school granted their request for a two-week period but determined that the interpreter was not necessary. A new IEP was written for her explaining that she would use hearing aids and her ability to read lips to learn in a regular classroom. In addition, she would have
Just a few years after starting to teach, they are granted tenure. And because of Teacher’s Union, it is almost impossible to break teacher (i.e. a bad teacher) from this rule. Teacher tenure is a highly debatable topic- Should it be kept or banned forever in all schools? However, there is clearly only one explanation to this problem: We simply cannot continue with teacher tenure.