James Thurber’s “The Catbird Seat” tells the story of how Mr. Martin outsmarts Mrs. Barrows. Mr. Martin, however, is no hero, and Mrs. Barrows is no villain; rather, Mr. Martin is a conniving, deceitful little man, with a touch of mental illness, who refuses to embrace change, and Mrs. Barrows is the true victim of his dark, scheming mind. Mr. Martin quite likely suffers from OCD, which affects how he handles life. This in turn also affects his view of Mrs. Barrows and the way that he interacts with her. Originally, Mr. Martin plans to murder Mrs. Barrows. However, when he is unable to complete his plan he devises a clever scheme in order to save his department, which he feels is under attack. There is evidence in the text suggesting that Mr. Martin suffers from a mental illness known as obsessive compulsive disorder …show more content…
Martin goes about his day “as usual” and completes each task “as he always did” (2). When night falls, after his supper and reading of the newspaper, it is time for his walk, that is simply a part of his routine. This walk is when the murder day becomes different from any other day. Since there is no precedent for murdering a colleague in Mr. Martin’s life things get a little more difficult for him then. With no weapon committing a violent crime becomes a bit more challenging, but then an interesting opportunity presents itself in the form of a drink. Mrs. Barrows innocently asks Mr. Martin if he would like a drink, and he malignantly accepts. This sets his dark new plan into motion. Mr. Martin continues to fuel the fire of his scheme with his hatred of Mrs. Barrows, not only of her crimes but also of her peccadillos because at this point he just cannot contain it anymore. A drink, drank. A cigarette, smoked. A story told of drugs and bombs and a threat made against the president was all it took. Mrs. Barrows, rightly, could not keep Mr. Martin’s atrocious actions a secret, which was exactly what he was counting
The trail on the true identity of Martin Guerre has drawn the interests of scholars and historians for centuries, allowing for details of the case to be preserved right up to the present. Popular interest was rekindled in the tale of Martin Guerre through the work of historian Natalie Zemon Davis’ book The Return of Martin Guerre, which interpreted the primary source literature in a new and original light. This interpretation has drawn sharp criticism from fellow historians such as Robert Finlay, who sees Davis’s work as misinterpreting and manipulating the evidence to allow for her original interpretation of the events. It is my opinion that Davis’s account of the case of Martin Guerre is unfounded and fabricated, and that Finlay’s criticism
However, the author quickly juxtaposes this idea with demeaning details that reveal McTeague’s downfall. McTeague is “sluggish”, “stupid, docile [and] obedient”. These characteristics convey a lazy ambition and weakness to push boundaries. This juxtaposition creates a sense of pity due to the promise and strength that McTeague possess yet his indolent mind holds him back.
Over the past week I read The Catbird Seat. The first time I read it, honestly, I had no idea what I had read. The second time I read it I viewed the story as if it was nothing but madness. I then read it a third time and viewed the story as a success in a brilliant way. I was very amused in many different ways each time I read the story.
So you see he would have been a very profound old man, indeed, to suspect…” Mr. Smith covered up this plotting with niceties to ensure that Mr. Johnson did not realize his goal and prevent it from happening, thus smartly providing an insurance policy for himself to secure his success. Page 59 tells of Mr. Smith carrying out his goals; it reads, “In an instant I dragged him to the floor, and pulled the heavy bed over him.” This proves that Mr. Smith could plan and successfully carry out a murder, proving that he was capable of handling himself and fulfilling his aspirations, but he could also control his behavior and knew when to restrict
At that moment John had to make a decision on whether to leave Mr. Bainbridge to his fait, or to intervene and try to save his life. As he approached a clearing he had made up his mind to try to save him. He picked up his rifle, aimed at the officer and shot, striking his target. He did not save Mr. Bainbridge because the sound of the gun scared the horse. After that the British army members chased after him.
Knowledge can be compared to a torch, or fire. Fire brings light and can help guide us through darkness. At the same time, fire, when not used wisely or contained, can lead to destruction. Similarly, the human species can use knowledge to further advance us, or we could let it tear us down. This is a common theme in the novels
As mentioned earlier, Martin’s family’s purpose for moving was to start a new life and leave the past behind; however, after realizing that the issue prevailed into the new house, he resulted in hiding the problem. Martin covering his case with his father, however, proved to only lead to more pain, eventually leaving him to the point of comparing himself as a prisoner who has no way out of his problem: “I was imprisoned, locked inside my father’s rage, held in a place I didn’t want to be but didn’t know how to escape” (167). Concealing the issue that was composed of constant arguments between them for years had finally reached to the point of making Martin a prisoner. Although some people suggest that one is better off by ignoring the issues or avoiding confrontation, but in Martin’s case, it proved that avoiding to speak about one’s issues can result in a profound pain that would continue to haunt him—as we see an adult Martin later in his essay who still admits to be fighting against himself, as he points out, “even now, when I live a more gentle life, I still feel I’m fighting the rage that my father left inside me, always trying to tamp it down, always on guard against its return” (169). Concealing an unhealthy relationship rather than admitting and facing the problem proved to cause more pain to Martin even after he lived
Many people, including a police officer, were also in attendance and could, therefore, confirm McMillian’s presence in the event and absence at the crime scene. Nevertheless, the authorities pin the case against McMillian without concrete evidence. They ignore the eyewitnesses who were with him at the fund-raiser event when the murder was allegedly committed. Therefore, prosecutors maliciously suppress vital testimonies, and on top of that, find false informants who come to court and testify against Walter McMillian. The only evidence that links McMillian to the murder of Morrison is a testimony by a white career criminal, Ralph Myers.
Although some of Christopher McCandless' decisions portray him as an anti-hero, his personality and determination demonstrate the qualities of a tragic hero, one who makes mistakes but still tries to follow his beliefs and ideals. Christopher McCandless is often described as a sociopath, and although he did hurt those around him, he was aware of what he had done and was beginning to reconcile with the idea of returning to society. McCandless had walked away from his parents and the life they had built for him. His father comments upon this, saying how he didn’t know how “‘a kid with so much compassion could cause his parents so much pain’” (104).
An obsession is essential for the development of a character, however, one must keep in mind the consequences that a character may face to achieve their obsession. Characters often overlook the obstacles that one might come across for the sake of their obsession. As a result, one may ruin their relationship with others and attain a state of unhappiness. Although one might argue that a character’s obsession may lead to happiness, an analysis of Prince Hamlet in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, and Guy Montag in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, depicts the theme of uncertainty when a character leads to downfall due to their obsessions. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, the protagonist, Guy Montag, develops an obsession with books.
In the gruesome short story “The Black Cat” by Edgar Allen Poe a nameless narrator tells his story of his drunken and moody life before he gets hung the next day. The intoxicated narrator kills his favorite cat, Pluto and his wife with an axe. Soon enough, the narrator gets caught and there he ends up, in jail. Although, most readers of “The Black Cat” have argued the narrators insanity, more evidence have shown that he is just a moody alcoholic with a lousy temper.
Birds are gifted with the extraordinary ability to fly. Their wings propel them above the ground and over people below. They are able to view the world from an angle that no one else gets to see. This is what makes birds and wings such powerful symbols in literature. These symbols characterize characters, move the plot and develop one more of the book’s ideas.
Lost Sparrow is a film about the pros and cons of inter-racial/out-of-state adoption, the death of two boys, and an exorbitant amount of secrets a single family can keep within their folds. This film shows us that secrets always come out and can directly affect relationships and the lives of those around you. Secrets are a big theme in this film, as it shows you what they can do to the people around you, and who people really are. Lost Sparrow illustrates how the truth comes out, and how it can be distorted over time depending on the people involved. Overall, this film made me angry and sad at how difficult these children’s lives were.
The narrator of “The Black Cat” is an alcoholic. By mistreating his pets and wife, he demonstrates how his addiction affects him. Alcoholism itself is an act of insanity because alcoholics see things in an entirely different manner than sober people. The narrator had a sufficient childhood and had a great deal of pets. Once he grew addicted
“Caged Bird” written by Maya Angelou in 1968 announces to the world her frustration of racial inequality and the longing for freedom. She seeks to create sentiment in the reader toward the caged bird plight, and draw compassion for the imprisoned creature. (Davis) Angelou was born as “Marguerite Annie Johnson on April 4, 1928 in St Louis, Missouri”. “Caged Bird” was first published in the collection Shaker, Why Don’t You Sing? 1983.