That’s just one reason Carnegie was a hero, because he came from nothing. Not only did he come from nothing but his business strategy and progressive business plan changed the business industry. If that doesn't make him a hero, being a philanthropist did. Andrew Carnegie was a hero, he came from nothing, he created a progressive business plan and he gave his money to the better good. Carnegie's business strategy and plan changed the business industry.
He was the type of person who was seeking to support the well being of others, mainly by the substantial contribution of currency to good causes. The amount of his generosity is nearly without noble. His donations surpass those of nearly everybody else’s in the nation’s history. The total of his achievements is equally historic. He constructed some 2,800 libraries around the world, created what converted into one of the world’s greatest research universities, donated one of the nation’s most noteworthy grant makers, and founded charitable establishments that are still operating nearly an era after his death.
These leaders were not only great leaders but had great ideas. For example in the article “The industrial revolution in america”, the author states “political leaders frequently used institutions like the House Of Morgan to finance government operations and perform diplomatic functions, both in peace and war.” Also in the same article they state, “Politics in the Gilded Age” the author says “ Political leaders did not seem particularly embarrassed by the open corruption.”This shows that they used their resources to make amazing ideas to help the country. This also shows that they really thought out these ideas to make sure that they weren 't leading everyone into a trap. As a result these political
Recommending to formulate the policies and encouraging to utilize more efficiently in order to improve society living standard. They conclude their paper by adding that remittance is not the sole but very decisive and eminent in its nature. Moreover there was one article published by journal of applied science, author CRK, Ahortor and DE Adentutsi (2011) finds the positive relationship of remittance and economic growth even different cross regional testing. The data are from African, Latin American, and also from Caribbean countries. It proves and authors argues that contemporaneously, remittance contributes more on long run.
He made 90 million dollars from Nike while he was only 18. This shoe company is half the reason he’s filthy rich. One charity Lebron funds is the Lebron James Family foundation. He hosts bike-a-thons in Akron, and he has also partnered with the University of Akron to provide 2300 sponsorships to students who can 't afford college. Because of Lebron 's charitable actions, many people in Akron and many other places where positively
Plus people that were employees to Carnegie’s industry of steel at least had a job so they can survive longer. If you were in Carnegies shoes wouldn’t you do the same? Andrew Carnegie was just being a entrepreneur. At last, Andrew Carnegie was a hero to America because he had one of the most influential philanthropy of all philanthropists. “Because he can administer it for the community far better than it could or would have done itself.”(Document E) Carnegie helped society change in a way that they will understand that not all rich people are ignorant with their money.
With his great generosity and acts of philanthropy,he paid his employers more than average and also supported the people(affordable prices). Some may argue that Henry Ford in fact was a Robber Baron or had the characteristics of a Robber Baron instead of a Captain of Industry. He did believe in anti-semitism and was believed to sympathized with the Nazi’s (based on his attacks on the Jewish in the newspaper “Dearborn Independent” and the decoration from Hitler 's government). Henry Ford was a business leader and should be remembered as a Captain of Industry for his great contributions to humanity such as the increase in the economy,the affordability of automobiles, and the good treatment/payment of his
In the case of Bill Gates, who is listed in an issue of this year’s Forbes as the richest man in the world, yet spends a decent amount of time attending to charity, we see that the ideals of collectivism can exist within the ideals of independence. Furthermore, in the U.S., our government provides us with social and entitlement programs which benefit many people and are thus beneficial to the common good. Proponents of extreme individualism and capitalism may argue against these programs, but when they or a family member suddenly need these services, it becomes beneficial to them to keep these programs alive. In the public school system, community service is generally encouraged, if not mandatory. This clearly benefits the common good, as it ensures there is a force out there working to fix up or perform services for the community, but many individuals who participated in these programs would contend (perhaps begrudgingly) that these programs benefited them mentally, intellectually, emotionally, physically, or any combination of the
The years between 500-1189 were “Golden Ages” because in the late Middle Ages there was more farmland, better tools to farm it, meant more food. More food meant that the population grew in Europe! Another reason why this was a Golden Time is because Ghana had an army that could protect traders, they worked hard, but they were safe and protected, and they had plenty to eat. The first reason it could be considered the Golden Era is because there was more farmland, if they had more farmland they would have more food, and if they had more food that would mean they also had more population. My evidence is “Available farmland tripled, and the food supply increased notably bringing up the population.”Available farmland tripled, and the food supply increased notably bringing up the population.” Europe was growing.
Similar to Africa, colonisation allowed for infrastructure to be vastly improved and modern technology improved their lives. Again, like Africa, the negatives heavily outweigh the positives, including famine, genocide and racism (Mueller, 2017). Despite this, both the positives and negatives can be seen today, and the size of the European empires and the length of time they reigned makes it clear that they shaped the