For an instance, sub-national groups involve in violence acts at times in the secessionist movement that nearly are terrorism acts in which there might be civilians’ indiscriminate movement among other things (Lutz & Lutz 2004). Besides, terrorists and freedom fighters are not jointly exclusive groups. Terrorists can also contend for countrywide liberation and on the other hand, freedom fighters can conduct inhumane violence acts and atrocities. More than one-third of particularly designated international terrorists recognized by the treasury department of the United States are linked to self-determination movements. Hence, both freedom fighters and terrorists seem having this in general- they contradict that ‘independence can be triumph by very peaceful means.
Scenes were a large amount of violence is portrayed have deeper meanings than just to punish others. Besides verbal or physical harm, themes are prominently present when extreme emotion is shown. In Homer’s epic, The Odyssey, violence is utilized to demonstrate how to establish one’s position among others and to show how destiny is often determined by the gods rather than mortals. Every lash, strike, or blow given hides a hidden message between the lines. Just like in present day, people have ulterior motives to commit acts of violence, and they are long and complicated instead of short and simple.
This part of the argument I would agree with the most, as when you try to prove that something indescribable exists you will fail as it cannot be described and instead are required to have faith. Let me explain what I mean: The whole purpose of these arguments is to prove that an all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good God exists, and according to the Judeo-Christian belief this God is also indescribable. Something that cannot be described cannot be fully proven to exists; therefore, in order to believe that God exists it will take a ‘leap of faith.’ The greatest strength of this argument is also its greatest weakness, as this leap of faith cannot without a shadow of a doubt prove that God
Part of the religious symbols in today’s world is irrefutable, and religious symbols play the role of unifying members of the common faith tradition. As John Lennon indicated, “The religious symbols are at our mind’s service and not the other way around; our minds aren’t at the service of that symbols”. Some critics claim that overrated faith, being stubborn and radical for trust and religion “sways” itself from different aspects. This may be right since the main ground for the war in Near Eastern and Far Eastern countries is radical religious faiths. However, when it comes to psychological and human rights sides of the religion, we cannot support the idea of prohibition of the religious symbols.
God is not accessible to man to ask which religion is the truth. Nathan uses the judge in the parable to explain that each religion should prove its truth through kindness and absolute love to all. One religion should not be scornful of others in order to justify its superiority. Each religion should respect and value the positions of other religions while still staying true to its own. Nathan uses this parable to preach religious tolerance to
Before a genuine dialogue begins, each religion must first set aside their exclusivist attitudes- but not setting aside all their beliefs- and be open to what others believe and through this, each religion will not only understand the faith of others but they can also have a deeper understanding of their faith. They must recognize the fact that their dissimilarities has rooted in their differences of culture which contributed in their differences of accepting, understanding and interpreting God’s revelation, they must recognize the fact that “in our less-than-perfect world even the religious community inspired by belief in the incarnate Word of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit remains far from the state of eschatological perfection”. Since these revealed religions are works, not only of God but also of man, one religion cannot be identified as the only source of truth. The researcher has stated earlier in this chapter the special case of Christianity- due to the fact that the unfathomable God was made known through his son Jesus Christ. It is for this reason, the researcher contends, that the Church is the main advocator of interreligious dialogue; it might seem that this is an exclusivist claim but the researcher does not aim in stressing the primacy of Christianity.
Even despite his creation of the world if we are to agree and follow God’s guidance without question this theory shows us that we are actually instead only undermining God’s goodness. Another major issue with the Divine Command Theory is the non–moral commandments listed in the Bible. If we were to strictly abide by the theory we would have to follow every command God makes as if it were moral code. Certain commands God makes are still applicable in every day life, the 10 commandments and even others can easily be followed by a dedicated individual. However it is when non-moral commands come to play where the DCT begins to lose its meaning.
The two types of protests have many similarities and differences. There are many different types of protest, however there are two main ones. Non-Violent protests usually consist of strikes, posters, rallies and abstaining from various procedures. Violent protests consist of riots, murders, vandalism, and damage to buildings. While non-violent protests sound better, they often turn violent.
This kind of postmodernism is also what constitutes what people call the “emerging Church” which is open to everything that people used to call divisions of beliefs. This is called apophatic theology and it means that the belief in God is done by negation. It does not necessarily deny Christian beliefs and traditions, but it is open to gradual positive reformations. It is not certain about anything – their faith remains a mystery, and they accept it because they are convinced that human beings are not sure about everything. “Postmodernism is in rebellion against traditionalism, and this is not such a bad
This is stated by Rita Gross who considers the psychological and spiritual aspects of humans as explanations on why there are many forms of religion. She declares that religious diversity, which is an inevitable phenomena, exists because it is impossible for humans to conform to only one type of religion psychologically and spiritually (Gross, 2015). This notion is supported by William James who said that it is not possible that creatures in such different positions and with such different powers as human individuals are, should have exactly the same functions and the same duties. No two of us have identical difficulties, nor should we be expected to work out identical solutions. Each, from his peculiar angle of observation, takes in a certain sphere of fact and trouble, which each must deal with in a unique manner (James, 2014).