Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was one of the worst times in world history. This was a period of time when thousands of people were being executed for unfair reasons because of Robespierre- an absolute monarch who believed that torture and terror were required to have a strong constitutional law. The reign of terror was not justified because Enlightenment ideas were ignored, the rights of the common people were violated, and the methods of punishment were too harsh. The first reason as to why the Reign of Terror was not justified is because Enlightenment ideas were ignored.
Opening paragraph The French Revolution was a major failure and a minor success. After all of the blood shed, the laws, civil rights, and codes did not get instituted effectively and did not represent the values that the citizens had fought for. Examples of this were the Napoleonic Code and Declaration of Rights of Man. Another reason it was a failure was because during the revolts and reforms more than 40,000 men and women died. This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right.
The Marriage of Figaro written by Beaumarchais portrays 18th century France, a time that had many controversies evolved around the ideas of social and political aspects of society. Beaumarchais incorporates his use of characters and scenes to portray French society at the time. The common people began to see the way the government was mistreating them and eventually began to stand up for what they believed in. Corruption within the nobles and upper-class people of society was common at the time. Figaro one of the main characters in the play, who comes from the common people social class is one who becomes dissatisfied with the government and eventually speaks out against it.
Overall, Burke wants to see an expansion of the British powers as well as an establishment of a partisanship between the middle class and parliament. Burke believes that “What’s good for me is good for a nation as a whole”. However, Burke did not encourage the harsh treatment of the working class; rather, he strived for a nature where they could live with honor and integrity. Burke says, “When ancient opinions and rules of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port we steer.” (Jacobian and Conservatives p.13) Without a general guidance for moral values as to what is right or wrong, society will collapse because riots and uprisings could occur, especially due to the harsh treatment of workers.
Thus, the community going against each other. The kingdom would’ve eventually fall and the king would have had no authority among the people anymore. Therefore, Hammurabi’s code of law was unjust because it allowed the strong to hurt the weak with minor
He also created a system of meritocracy, giving positions based on people's talents and not to the ones that are higher classes. People that were more poor, got a chance to earn more money. Another enlightenment idea that he supported was education and art, and he built free public schools so all children were able to get educated. Some might argue that he crowned himself king and his brother King of Spain, which means that he did not get rid of the monarchy even though that was one of the main ideas during Enlightenment. But Napoleon had plebiscites, people that were allowed to vote, and
General Clinton’s inaction after General Washington’s force departure guaranteed the historical unfolding of the Siege of Yorktown. The largest contributor to this British disaster lay in the lacking of an analytical apparatus, which could have effectively processed and utilized British intelligence. General Clinton chose to focus more on salvation in the form of reinforcements from Britain than on the immediate steps he could implement in his intelligence war fighting function to cement victory. This overreliance on an ineffective logistical support chain, combined with poor strategy, toxic leadership, and indecisiveness, resulted in an overly defensive positon. This ineptitude set the stage for the loss of British populace support, costing him the war of attrition.
In fact, Joseph McCarthy himself suffered this consequence: “It was his clash with the Army that would lead to his downfall” (Robert 3). By accusing the Army of treason, he lost respect in the population and bad opinions spread around, ruining his power streak.This risk prevented these kinds of people from succumbing to actions that would sabotage their reputation. In addition, McCarthyism allowed these kinds of nasty people, such as McCarthy, to act upon unsightly desires. Therefore, the McCarthy trials encouraged the conflict between
According to Plato 's Republic, "The aim of education is not to put knowledge into the soul, but to put the right desires into the soul-to fill the soul with a lust for truth, so that it desires to move past the visible world, into the intelligible, ultimately in the form of good." Plato really didn 't focus on the knowledge, but he wanted the people to learn the good things. These two governments are both resulting in forcing the people to attain certain things. In the United States, citizens have found that the government is taking other classes off of their class schedule list. They are forcing people to do certain classes and that results in force of education.
The Conference of 1914 reiterated its customary frustration at the government’s failure to address their grievances in relation to the 1902 Education Act. Delegates desired a well-funded educational system that was ‘thoroughly civic and national, and subject to democratic control’, which afforded ‘entire relief from payment for denominational teaching’ and secured ‘for all teachers absolute freedom from all sectarian test.’ They welcomed improvements in educational administration but feared that the Government had endangered the principle of free education in its recent Finance Act. However, a vote in favour of secular education was defeated as was a motion censuring the Government for its tardiness. Indeed, that year began with a Leader