ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Tiger And The Most Dangerous Game

908 Words4 Pages

Short stories, “The Child Tiger” and “The Most Dangerous Game”, each began by portraying a main character who possessed a positive world-view; however, after facing their own unexpected crises and observing man’s inhumane behaviors, both Sanger Rainsford and George Weber, similarly altered their personal -character and -philosophy, reflecting a more negative outlook. Sanger Rainsford, the main character of “The Most Dangerous Game”, began his quest feeling proud of his life 's work; he was a skilled hunter who had faced and conquered a variety of unique and challenging experiences. Furthermore, Rainsford was confident of his personal motives. When he was approached by a minor character who presented him with a conflicting ideology; “Even so, I rather think they understand one thing- fear. The fear of …show more content…

1), Rainsford countered this allegation by justifying his actions. He believed the animals he hunted did not experience any fear, for they were only animals. Rainsford also held a firm trust in mankind. Despite how his beliefs were reflected, regarding animals, he made it clear that he believed in mankind and he could not condone murder. “‘Hunting? Great guns, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder[…] I’m a hunter, not a murderer’” (p. 7). Rainsford, was overall a proud and positive man with high self esteem and an slight ignorance of mans cruel tendencies. Similarly, in the beginning of the short story “The Child Tiger”, George Weber was portrayed as a happy individual. He was an innocent and trusting young boy; often depicted playing with his friends and asking Dick Prosser, the unexpected antagonist, about his vast knowledge regarding life. However, as much as Weber loved Dick, he had always felt off about

Show More
Related

  • Rainsford In George Orwell's The Most Dangerous Game

    600 Words  | 3 Pages

    To convey the theme of competition can enhance a person’s character, Richard Connell has Rainsford succeed at the Most Dangerous Game. Rainsford shows through the big hunt growth because he knows strategies and ways to win the big hunt. The frightening event is when he has to build his traps to stay away from the General. The exciting is when he meets him back at the house and kills the General and win the Most Dangerous

    Read More

  • Analytical Essay On The Most Dangerous Game

    305 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford’s mindset on hunting changes throughout the story as he begins to understand fear of the hunted. In the beginning of the story, the protagonist Rainsford shows no empathy towards the animals he has slayed, even going as far as saying, “Who cares how a jaguar feels?” (14). Convinced that hunting is the finest sport in the world, Rainsford casually disregards any thought about an animal’s feelings, believing that they are simple-minded creatures unable to understand basic emotion. However, as the story progresses, Rainsford himself becomes one of the hunted, and has the choice to either fight his best to survive the hunt, or to perish like all the others.

    Read More

  • Dynamic Change In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

    772 Words  | 4 Pages

    he Most Dangerous Game Around the time after World War 1 on Ship-Trap Island, Rainsford, the protagonist of this fantastic prose, goes through a dynamic internal change. In his short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell, portrays and paints a picture of how civilization and society can ever defeat a man’s murderous drive; the instinct in a man that pressures him on to perform a murderous task. Connell also touches on how the roles can change: the dominant can become subservient or less than, and how the forceful and strong minded can become the weaker ones. He tries to make the reader understand that to be successful, the hunter (the strong), must imitate the hunted (the weak); the man must act the animal, and civilization must impersonate and hide its brutality. The major conflict reflects dynamic change in the main

    Read More

  • Irony In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Cornell

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game Analysis “The Most Dangerous Game” is an interesting story and the author Richard Cornell uses many literary techniques and descriptive text to write the story. In his short story he uses a lot of irony, imagery and foreshadowing to make the story suspenseful. The use of these literary devices suggests that Connell wanted to make the readers feel a sense of fear and danger. This forces readers to stay on their toes at all times and to make them want to keep reading. As we analysis the story we find out that the protagonist Rainsford, a pro hunter is about to see how it feels to be on the other side of the gun for once in his life.

    Read More

  • Rainsford Vs Zaroff Essay

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Most Dangerous Game In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Sanger Rainsford, and the antagonist, General Zaroff, are similar characters. Both Rainsford and Zaroff share common passions, skills and ideology. Initially, there is admiration between both characters, because Rainsford is Zaroff’s hero and Rainsford is grateful for Zaroff being welcome to him. However.

    Read More

  • Control Of Emotions In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

    370 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the short story The Most Dangerous Game, the author Richard Connell shows that Rainsford needs control of his emotions, patience , and expert hunting and decision making skills in order to defeat Zaroff. Rainsford needs to gain control of his emotions to outthink Zaroff, who symbolizes Rainsfords "steep hill". When he finds that he is going to be hunted his natural instinct is to run and panic, but then he stops to look around and get a grip on the task at hand. Then at a critical moment when Zaroff finds him in a tree, Rainsford panics again because he realizes Zaroff is on his trail and is toying with him. Once again, he gains control of his emotions and formulates a plan.

    Read More

  • Comparing Rainsford And General Zaroff

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most people when they hear “The Most Dangerous Game” they think of bull riding or other dangerous games that don’t involve death. “The Most Dangerous Game” is a suspenseful cliff hanging story that follows the days of a castaway on the island of a crazed hunter. Rainsford is a big game hunter who falls off a boat near the island of General Zaroff, a big Cossack general who is looking for an alternative to hunting dangerous animals but with a twist. Throughout “The Dangerous Game” Rainsford and General Zaroff both show examples of IRony and exert arrogance.

    Read More

  • General Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game

    588 Words  | 3 Pages

    General Zaroff is different, to say the least, in Richard Connell’s book, “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford is stranded on a deserted island, or so he thinks. Rainsford comes upon a mansion that is owned by General Zaroff. He knows of Rainsford, who is a renowned author of a book about the hunt, as well as everything and everywhere Rainsford has hunted. General Zaroff is also a hunter, but he goes to the extreme.

    Read More

  • Sanger Rainsford Character Analysis

    624 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Richard Connell's short story"The Most Dangerous Game," the protagonist Sanger Rainsford is selfish, unsympathetic, and cruel. In the beginning, Rainsford talks to Whitney about the prey’s, in this case, the animal's perspective while being hunted, like how they feel. Rainsford and Whitney butt heads. Rainsford’s philosophy is much like Zaroff's. Rainsford disagrees with Whitney, who believes that animals can comprehend the fear of pain and death.

    Read More

  • Most Dangerous Game Argumentative Essay

    629 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rainsford had mentioned earlier in the story that the world is made of two groups, the hunters and the huntees. Though in this case, where it is quite harsh, it indeed would seem true. In life, both in nature and in everyday human life, it would seem that there is hunters and

    Read More

  • Was Rainsford Justified In Killing General Zaroff Analysis

    662 Words  | 3 Pages

    Firstly, in the story The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford is justified in killing General Zaroff because on the island the only way to live is if the stranded people hunt or the stranded will in contrast become the ones being hunted. In the beginning of the story Rainsford is talking to Whitney about jaguars. Whitney is stating that the jaguars must feel some sort of feeling like fear or terror but in contrast Rainsford states that the jaguars have no understanding of feelings. Then Rainsford is put on a island where he symbolically represents the jaguar and General Zaroff would symbolically represent the hunter.

    Read More

  • Short Essay On The Most Dangerous Game

    840 Words  | 4 Pages

    When placed in this situation, Rainsford has transformed from being the hunter to becoming the huntee, and is now in the position of all the animals he has carelessly killed before. Towards the end of the story, while Rainsford is being hunted by Zaroff and his pack of dogs, the narrator describes how Rainsford feels by saying that: “Rainsford now knew how an animal at bay feels” (22). The sensation of extreme fear and worry had finally gotten to him, and he can relate to how the animals he hunt may

    Read More

  • The Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay

    653 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hunters believe animals are not capable of reasoning and they see them as something lesser than humans. Throughout time, these positions can change. The short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, consists of General Zaroff being the hunter and Rainsford being the hunted. During the story, their positions change to the complete opposite.

    Read More

  • Most Dangerous Game Character Analysis

    848 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is forced to test his survival skills while he is intensely hunted by an experienced war general named General Zaroff. In this story, Rainsford exhibits some very helpful characteristics like his resourcefulness, his strategic planning, and his ability to reason. As a result of Rainsford’s questioning the validity of General Zaroff’s hunting methods, he ended up playing in the game. Although I believe Rainsford is a very helpful, interesting, and dynamic character, at the end of the story, he must give up his own personal morals to win the game.

    Read More

  • Characterization In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    In “The most dangerous game” written by, Richard Connell, he uses many devices such as: characterization, plot structure and theme to contribute to the overall meaning of the story. Characterization is a big part of the overall meaning of the story which is that survival is of those who are smart, cunning, and can adapt to their environment. The protagonist Rainsford is at a constant battle with the antagonist General Zaroff. Throughout the entire short story they both have similar minds sets and then farther along the main character 's mind set develops into something more. The reader can almost sense a self centeredness, and that he believes that there are only two type of people in this world, “the hunters and the huntees”, and he believes that he is the hunter.

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Tiger And The Most Dangerous Game

Open Document