The Clash Of Civilizations Analysis

1986 Words8 Pages
Mr. Huntington’s The Clash of Civilizations is a philosophy; that people's cultural and religious individualities will be the upcoming principal source of divergence in the post-Cold War world. Huntington began his theory by discussing the diverse beliefs about the nature of global politics in the post-Cold War period. Furthermore, he believed that although the age of ideology had ended, the world had relapsed to a customary state of affairs characterized by cultural conflict. In this article, he explored the concept that the primary axis of conflict would be not only cultural but also religious lines; the “fault lines” between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future. Huntington suggests that the concept of diverse cultures, as…show more content…
Differences among civilizations are not only real they are basic. People of different civilizations have diverse opinions on the relations between god and man, parents and children, husbands and wife, the individual and the group, the citizen and the state, additionally contrary views of the significance of rights and responsibilities, hierarchy and equality, authority and liberty. All of which are the kin of centuries, more vital than political ideologies and regimes. This paper sets forth the hypotheses that variances between civilizations are genuine and significant; civilization-consciousness is mounting. Therefore, conflict between civilizations will displace ideological and other dominant global form of conflict. International relations a game played amongst western civilizations will increasingly be de-westernized and become a game in which non-western civilizations are players and not simply bystanders. This paper will assess Huntington’s arguments and conclude to which extent they can be agreed with or opposed.…show more content…
Therefore, with economic interests at heart, countries will similar cultural or religions opinions are likely to form interlinking agreements; as a result of this a gap will form, marking the boarder to who belongs and who doesn’t. Trade, commerce and environmental policies will all be centered around common religion and civilization and those who form coalitions on the ground of ideology, will be victorious in the future battle. In his article he states that religion discriminate sharply and exclusively among people. A person can be half German and half Arab and simultaneously even a citizen of two countries. However, It is more difficult to be half catholic and half Muslim, and as demonstrated above he almost foreshadowed the near future of his time. The rumor that such horror could be fuelled by religious anger sent people rushing back to texts they had once ignored. September 11th did more than send shock waves through the USA; it deranged much of the American public by giving it a heavy does of shell shock; shell shock that left them feeling venerable to attack and
Open Document