Do you know how many people are in danger because of a gun. Many lives have been taken just because of a single bullet, despite this little to no action has taken place about these weapons, it’s a little frightening isn’t it. Shootings and deaths by guns are becoming all too common and many people have argued whether or not our government need to do something about this. If gun laws and gun control were implemented then it would lower violence, make it harder for criminals to get these items, and save lives. Though gun control may not protect every life, it would save many. To begin, enforcing gun control would lower the rate of gun violence. According to a website named ProCon.org, it states “The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely …show more content…
According to ProCon.org “universal background checks could reduce firearm deaths by a projected 56.9%”. As seen in the quote, deaths would decrease substantially since people who are using the gun to hurt would never get them in the first place. Gun control laws would definitely add in background checks in order to get a legal gun. Many gun users also agree with this check on whether or not people should get their background checked before a gun in purchased. People may argue that people can get guns illegally. Procon.org provides that 75% of guns are legally bought and that not all the guns used in shootings are legal. Though that may be true, that same information also suggest that background checks would help as well. The statement claims shows that 75% of guns used in shootings are legally bought so that means that background checks would eliminate most of that 75% of guns used in shooting. The background checks would make it harder to get legal guns if your background is bad. The info just proves more that these background checks do help reduce death and injuries. To summarize, background checks prevent anyone with a bad background to get guns and use them in harmful
This bill would add more people to the criminal background check database, which would stop poeple on the list from buying a gun. It would also make it so every gun purchase would require a background check. This would close the gun show loophole, where you can buy a gun at a gun show without a background check, but need a background check to buy a gun at a store. Proponents want this to pass to keep criminals from getting guns more easily. It is too easy for a criminal to buy a gun at a gun show, at some criminals are not on the list of those with criminal backgrounds that should keep them from buying a gun at store.
According to Bernie Sanders, "Gun control legislation should ultimately fall on individual states, except instant background checks to prevent firearms from finding their way into the hands of criminals and the mentally ill, and a federal ban on assault weapons. "(Page 2). But, this is a good way to prevent people from getting killed by someone who does not use firearms for the right reason. Some people have guns for hunting and protection. We could not stop someone from using guns for hunting if that's what they are into.
It says in the constitution itself. If someone wishes to get a gun, they can get a gun. Prohibiting them or placing stricter laws will be of no benefit. While conducting background checks on individuals who wish to purchase a gun does have some rationale to it, it could make any law abiding American look like an unstable psycho for committing a simple act with no mal intent. For example, say a friend
The Bill of Rights is something the American people hold close to them, especially their right to bear arms. Recently there has been a lot of debate over implementing gun regulations without infringing on the rights of the people. While a position of this is expressed in Wayne LaPierre’s “Universal Background Checks Mean Gun Registration, Gun Bans and Confiscation”, Jeffrey Toobin’s “So You Think You Know the Second Amendment” provides a more valid position evaluating the issue of gun control. Universal background checks are a big discussion lately in our country’s current climate.
(Richards, Paragraph 4) With the system being like this it leaves for a lot of loopholes for the criminals and their helpers to get through to purchase a gun. Stricter background checks in gun shows and online websites would make for a safer gun buying experience because a person will know who is getting the gun that is being sold. The people that do not want this, say it is harder for them and takes more time to go through the process of getting a gun, but if they know they have a clean record then what do they have to lose? A stricter background check should not affect anybody but the bad people and criminals that do not have any business with guns anyway. In a separate study, “Webster found that firearm-related homicides in Connecticut dropped 40 percent after the state adopted a 1995 law that required anyone seeking to buy a handgun to apply for a permit with the local police, complete at least eight hours of safety training, and be 21 years old.”
Certain people that are not allowed to buy guns in shops can still purchase them from private sellers or gun shows, where background checks are not actually required (Nakaya 10). Which is why criminals are still able to purchase guns, since they know of places where background checks are not required. In addition to that, anyone can sell their gun to another person without a license to sell or without completing a background check (Gun Control 109). Even though some places do require background checks there are still many flaws that can happen such as mental illness and certain criminal felonies. A flaw in the background checking system is what allowed Dylann Roof to purchase a gun then shoot people in a bible study at church.
Even if gun control laws are passed, criminals will still find a way to acquire the guns they want. Citizens should also be able to defend their Second Amendment rights. The Second Amendment to the United States constitution states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in the Bill of Rights because they feared the federal government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals. Certain citizens should have the right to carry concealed guns so that they be protected and prepared for situations in which they feel
Therefore, there need to be more laws and limitations when it comes to selling a gun either through a private or public seller. Max Ehrenfreund also says that “Requiring background checks for private sales and transfers would make it harder for convicted felons to buy guns secondhand, but some would still buy guns as a favor to brothers or boyfriends who wouldn 't qualify themselves (Ehrenfreund). Whether someone is selling a gun from a private or public party there needs to be background checks. Background checks need to be more invasive to ensure public safety. Former President Barack Obama once said that “I am taking within my legal authority to protect the American people and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people.
Guns have had, and continue to have, an effect on American citizens. Given numerous recent events involving violence, the process of obtaining and possessing firearms needs to be taken into consideration. A major debate on the topic revolves around requiring a background check before the purchase of a gun. As of right now, a background check is required before purchasing a firearm. Are these background checks effective in preventing gun violence?
While universal background checks seem like common sense, gun lobbyists say that criminals could just get their guns from the black market so there is no point controlling all gun sales (Sullum). Despite this, if the checks stopped only one person, they would be effective. The solution to the problem regarding controlling all gun sales is a simple one — implement universal background checks.
This leads to more frequent occurrences of gun violence because civilians will not have access to the means of protecting themselves. In over 75% of cases in gun related deaths, the gun has been purchased illegally. Instead of outlawing the commercial purchase of firearms, why doesn’t the government mandate background checks and focus on crime control? In 1976, the Firearms Control Regulation Act was passed.
Due to the black market on guns, anyone can acquire one without a background check. Despite current laws towards purchasing guns, there will always be someone going around the law to purchase a gun. However, if you go to a local gun store you will need a full background check to purchase a gun. The history
This background check would be required for every single gun purchase, including private, street and online purchases. The background check is made of that person's criminal record and mental health records as provided by federal and state courts and agencies. These background checks would cover that person's activity and all 50 states. 40% of gun sales are done without a background check because they are private, online, street or illegal sales.
According to the ATF, there are approximately 55,000 licensed gun dealers in the US plus 8,000 pawn shops with licenses to sell them. With so many stores to sell these guns, it makes it almost impossible to control them each. Who knows how many of these stores lets anyone get away with a gun without a license or background checks. This goes into the idea that these shop owners should also go through a background check and license renewal every year or so, to guarantee genuineness. Not only is it the type of situation which can’t be cured entirely, it can be slowed down, which is why we need better precautions for people buying these
In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.