ipl-logo

The Constitution Pros And Cons

841 Words4 Pages

The U.S. Constitution The U.S. constitution established America’s fundamental laws, National Government, and guaranteed rights for the citizens. We needed this document because our national government was weak and the states where separated into independent countries. There was not a president and this gave congress the power to govern foreign affairs, conduct war and regulate currency. After the United States gained independence from Great Britain our country needed a stronger central government. The Articles of Confederation were the first written constitution of the Untied States. Under the Articles of this Confederation the states remained sovereign and intendent. Congress was also given the authority to make treaties and alliances, maintained armed forces and coin money. This didn’t work …show more content…

John jay wrote the eighty-five essays; know collectively as “The Federalist” papers. Also, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton assisted him in the writing of these essays. They where published under pseudonym public in newspapers across the states. Federalist were the people who supported the constitution. The anti-federalists were those who do not support the new constitution. The first five states to agree with the constitution where: Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. In February 1788 a compromise was stated that in assurance that amendments would be imminently proposed. George Washington became the first president of the United States. The Bill of Rights guarantees each individual certain basic protects. These include freedom of speech, religion and the press, the right to bear and keep arms, peaceably assemble. Also, protection from unreasonable search and seizure as well as the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury are some of the freedoms garneted by the Bill of Rights. In 1789, the father of the Bill of Rights was James

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    616 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are countless Arguments both for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. Some of the main arguments of the Federalist include that a strong National government offered protection for the people’s rights, the government would benefit from a 3 branch system and a system of checks and balances needed to be created. Some of the main ideas of the anti-federalist were that the National Government would have too much power, a Bill of Right needed to be added, the constitutions effect of the government would be too tyrannical, and that the federal court system would be too powerful. Considered the Father of the Constitution, James Madison was detrimental in the creation In the US Constitution.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq

    375 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Constitution was created to define the powers and limitations of the government. It replaced the Articles of the Confederation, and was ratified by all 13 states in 1787 (American Government, n.d.). The ratification of the Constitution was not without opposition, and the government was split into two groups: federalists, and anti-federalists. The federalist group believed that a national governing body, ruled by the elite class was necessary. Antifederalists, on the other hand, believed that state governments should have more say, and that the government should be run by ordinary people (American Government, n.d.).

    Read More

  • Hamilton Vs. The Anti-Federalists

    872 Words  | 4 Pages

    On September 17, 1787, The Philadelphia Convention emitted their own new constitution to the states for ratification. Instead, The Federalist profoundly accepted the Constitution for several reasons, which included that this new constitution allowed for higher and further central government, that was formerly undermined under the Articles of Confederation. In the other hand, The Anti-Federalist, did not want a authoritative and dominant central government, but instead, powerful state governments; in response to the new constitution, many of the Anti-Federalists began writing different essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists experiment at earning states to not rarify the Constitution, many federalists advanced a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Analysis

    838 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Constitution had to be ratified by 9 states in order to become America’s official government. In the states were supporters of the Constitution and opposers. Federalists were people that wanted the Constitution to be ratified and those

    Read More

  • Confederation Vs Us Constitution Essay

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    Under the articles of confederation the states clearly held the majority of the power first off the states not the federal Government were the ones who created the money. The states were the ones who could tex the people not the federal government and they could also regulate trade between other countries and other states. To amend the articles of confederation all states had to agree. The articles of confederation clearly favored the states but this is not the case for the U.S constitution. The constitution clearly favors the federal government while still being fair to all states.

    Read More

  • How Did The Articles Of Confederation Give More Power To The Government Than The States

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the map “Ratification of the Federal Constitution, 1787-1790,” a large amount of the states had a federalist majority, meaning that they supported the Constitution. Most of the Federalists were rich men who were large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen and merchants. Led by Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, James Madison, and George Washington, federalists “believed the national government was too wear under the Articles of Confederation” and wanted a strong federal government (Document 3). However, the antifederalists disagreed with the Constitution. They “feared strong national government would lead to tyranny” and wanted strong state governments (Document 3).

    Read More

  • How Does Paine Create A New American Government

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American government that we know today, had many troubles when it first came together when the Constitution was first ratified in 1788. There had been many failed attempts at creating a new and successful government, such as the Articles of Confederation the first plan for the new American government. This proved to be very unsuccessful because the states held all federal power, while the national government had very little. In order to please both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalist, each party agreed to the Constitution with the addition of the Bill of Rights. Documents like the Virginia Declaration of Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the above documents are heavily influenced by the writings of John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu,

    Read More

  • Problems Under The Articles Of Confederation

    615 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation had many problems and therefore it made the government weak. One of may problems was that under the Articles Of Confederation was that there was no executive branch, and so nobody could enforce or carry out laws made by Congress. Another problem was that each state only had one vote in Congress. When each state only had one vote states that had small populations had the same amount as a large state.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

    668 Words  | 3 Pages

    1. Personally, I believe the constitution was the better document because it had more power. The articles of confederation gave the states more power than congress had, and because of this states either did was it said or did not. Because of the states having more power over Congress, the states did not focus on the needs of the whole country but only cared for their own state and what is best for their people. The constitution is better because it was easier to make changes and amendments to it.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were a document seen as the “first” constitution of the United States. This document granted the new national government power to control the military, declare war, and create treaties between the states. However, the Articles had holes in it considering the government did not have the power to tax, create laws without at least nine states’ approval, or change the Articles of Confederation without a unanimous vote. This means that the country soon fell into debt and petty arguments between state, the new government had no control. It was time for a change.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Constitution Of 1787

    1512 Words  | 7 Pages

    Constitution 1The Constitution of the United States(1787)The development that prompted to the written work of the 1787constitution became out of disappointment with thefunctioning of the Articles of Confederation. Asearly as 1781, there were proposition to amendthe Articles. The key issue was that theCongress had no free saddling power, andwas reliant on the states for commitments itrequested from them. More than once from 1781 to1786 proposition were made for restricted taxingpower, typically a little altered obligation on importedgoods, yet every one foundered on the necessityof getting consistent sanction of all thestates. By 1786, Congress was largelyparalysized.

    Read More

  • Causes And Flaws Of The Articles Of Confederation

    310 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitution was a document that was written by our Founding Fathers. It defines what our government is and what it does. It is the basic blueprint for all the laws in the country and it provides the three branches of the U.S government the power it needs to rule this nation effectively. But the Constitution wasn’t always how it is now, it used to be called the Articles of Confederation and it had many problems that are no longer present in our current Constitution.

    Read More

  • The Articles Of Confederation: The First Constitution: United States

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was the United States first constitution. Under these articles, the states remained sovereign and independent, with Congress serving as the last resort. Congress was also given the authority to make treaties and alliances, maintain armed forces, and coin money. The Articles of Confederation was written in 1787 and ratified on March 1st, 1781. (http://www.history.com/topics/articles-of-confederation)

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    148 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation was structured to give the majority power to the States while limiting the involvement of Government. The federal government was bestowed with the responsibility of mutual defense for the states and to “secure the blessings of liberty.” Government was supposed to be able to pass acts, however, each state was only permitted one representative regardless of that state’s population and votes needed to be unanimous for an act to pass. The power of the central government was vague and nearly unenforceable. Without a judicial system the federal government was unable to enforce penalties or consequences and without the ability to collect tax they could not finance the government meetings let alone the military to defend

    Read More

  • Us Constitution Still Relevant Today Essay

    1012 Words  | 5 Pages

    These people are known as federalists and antifederalists. The federalists are the people that support the constitution. These people believe that the constitution is the best way for the country to prosper. It is the only way to make sure this country stays the way it is. On the other side of the argument are the anti-federalists.

    Read More

More about The Constitution Pros And Cons

Open Document