In 1862, 38 Dakota warriors were hanged in Mankato Minnesota. The Dakota were the first people to live and thrive in Minnesota. They used the land to the fullest extent without abusing it, and have grown to have a deep connection to the land. Their connection and importance to the land was so profound, they had a number of origin stories. Places like B’dote, Pike Island, and Fort Snelling, all hold importance as it is believed that those are the origin points of the world. These sacred places that the Dakota held so dear, were taken from them through legalized theft and deceit. For these reasons, the Dakota should receive a large portion of southern Minnesota untouched by the government, as it is largely uninhabited and farm land. In addition, …show more content…
In the book What Does Justice Look Like, the author,Waziyatawin, elaborates on the possibilities that could come from having a soil rich farm, and what good it could do for a community. It ensures a self sufficient system that would require little to no outside help and would have little to no down sides…… Winters a thing though. Waziyatawin mentioned the fact that the Dakota has always been cautions when using natural resources, that they would never deplete the land of its natural resources as the Minnesotans had in the 1800s. “Minnesotans harvested 2.3 billion board feet of lumber that year from our forest. They sustained that high level of exploitation for another ten years before yields began to decline and business interest had stripped our white pine forest” (Waziyatawin, 138-139). This shows the carelessness and the neglect from the settlers when it comes to the environment. They are only in for the money, nothing else. No relationships, friendships, nothing more than a good profit. Not to mention the personal connection to the land. The Dakota held the land very closely to them. As in the story Skywoman Falling, (Kimmerer, 7), it mentions that the point of origin for the Dakota is B’dote, and that the land, the animals, and the surroundings all worked as one to make everything that is. This a very different view than that of …show more content…
Why give the Dakota land when they can already live in the city with everyone else? Why can 't we just pay them a certain amount, if any. There have already been public apologies for the errors of the settlers. Why put more thought into this matter? What would giving them farm land that no one uses, benefit anyone? There are already part of the US and cities within Minnesota that are meant for Native Americans, there is little to no need for more land to be bought out. “Native Americans received 11 million acres in parcel land grants, which were put into individual trusts dating back to 1887 known as the Dawes Act. The government at the time had deemed Indians incapable of handling the land responsibly, so it administers financial matters for them” (Pearson, John, and Geraldine Wagner, 150). By the looks of this, the Native Americans already received land from the American government and were deemed unfit to maintain the land. There are many forms of reparation that could be considered when it comes to the subject of the Dakota. However, only one seem truly appropriate for the matter; land reparation. Now, the amount of land is up for debate. Some would argue for more, and some would argue for less. “Reparations are not a practical response to the fact that prior generations of humanity conducted wars and otherwise behaved badly” (Pearson, John, and Geraldine Wagner, 151).
Congressman Bishop began the seminar by discussing public lands and his continued work on the projects that he believes benefit Utah. He described the issue by first displaying a map of the amount of land that is considered public lands in the west in comparison to the land in the east. By and large, the east has little public lands and the west has a considerable amount. Congressman Bishop explained that this is because when the Eastern states joined the union they were given their land back to them. When the federal government did not give the land back a couple of eastern states sued the federal government and received their land.
North Dakota is the most rural of all the states, with farms covering more than 90% of the land. It’s known for its rich oil from fosses that were left behind after Lake Agassiz dried up. In the book North Dakota History by Neil Howe, he explains how during the last Ice Age, northern North America was covered by a glacier, which alternately advanced and deteriorated with variations in the climate. Before the Ice Age, North Dakota had a sub-tropical climate much like Florida is today. This continental ice sheet covered much of central North America between 30,000 and 10,000 years ago (Howe 33).
We like to think of our land as our land, but is it really ours? We all know of Squanto and how he helped the pilgrims survive, yet we fail to show our appreciation. After helping these new people to their land, the Indians including the Osage are driven from their land to deserted reservations meant specifically for them in the Indian removal act. To make matters worse, the land rush of 1889 had the Osage moved to even smaller areas. Now the Osage were relying on the government to support them as they knew not how to plant crops and could not scavenge as they used to.
While some americans may agree with tecumseh, many others would maintain their belief that the natives were not entitled to land because of their savagery. Yet, by paralleling land to
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).
The 19th century was a pivotal point in our state’s foundation. That being said, one cannot discuss the imperativeness of Wisconsin and its connection to the outside world without maintaining its staples of industry at the forefront of conversation. Though Wisconsin brought a cornucopia of cultures and new ideas into it from Europe in the 1800s, the chief bridge between it and the rest of the world is, unequivocally, its labor complex and the fruits it bore. At the conception of its settlement, Wisconsin’s expansive wilderness was nothing short of irresistible to all those who witnessed its magnitude.
Any land worth everything that any man has to give. Anguish, ecstasy, faith, jealousy, love, hatred, life or death. Don't you see that's the whole excuse for our existence? It's what makes the whole thing possible and tolerable. Debra Marguart expresses her overwhelming love for the upper Midwest territory, even as it was called an uninhabitable and bare location for many who first approached it.
(pg. 686) As America expanded westward to pursue a “special ‘destiny’ to settle, develop, and dominate the entire continent,” they invaded the territory promised to Native Americans. (pg. 680, pg. 686) Promises made to Indians that they would keep and own their land in the West without worrying about trespassers were consistently broken by “buffalo hunters, miners, ranchers, farmers, railroad surveyors, and horse soldiers.”
During the 1840, the United States was able to access much more land in the west than previously before. The United States saw this as an opportunity to expand their territories and to settle and obtain all things the land has to offer. The United States justified their actions through the idea of Manifest Destiny, which they viewed to be a harmless and benevolent philosophy. Manifest Destiny was in fact not as benign as the United States has come to believe; it caused the colonization and imperialism of land that held many Natives who were eventually killed or sent into reservations. People in the southern region of the conquered land were greatly influenced by this expansion as well; it caused many families who were living in the Texas area
Lilly Fuller-Delmont 1/17/18 S.S8 DBQ Essay Per.3 In the mid 18th century settlers moved to the west. Their move brought them more opportunities and a better lifestyle on the frontier. Such as the transcontinental Railroad.
Rather than forced Native American to leave their land, The president Jackson and the congress could develop some activities to share the outcome of gold with them. They could find and arrangement which could result to leave them on their land and share the outcomes of the exploitations of the gold and others natural resources.
These issues can still improve through cooperation and understanding, however, and reaching a satisfactory decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline provides a perfect gateway to uplifting improvement of the reservations’ lifestyle. If the government agrees to give a little, a great opportunity arises for them to get a little as well. In the last decades, lack of funding has led to blatantly subpar education for the majority of Native American students, even when the government made an attempt to intervene due to an understandable inherent distrust of Government interference. Through a monumental compromise via the Dakota Access Pipeline, the government could prove its decency, transparency, and trustworthiness, which would advance the relationship of Native Americans and the United States Government brilliantly. The newfound trust could easily apply to areas such as financial welfare, educational support, and government-run health clinics.
The name “Sioux” is short for “Nadouessioux”, meaning “little snakes”, given to them by their spiteful long time rival the Ojibwa tribe. The Sioux community was divided into a organized nation of seven different, smaller tribes; later becoming known as: Oceti Sakowin, which translates into “Seven Council Fire” in the Sioux indigenous language. To keep their history alive, the Sioux practiced oral tradition in sharing their past, through the Siouan language and occasionally, they communicated through sign language. They were a dominant tribe in Minnesota that later migrated continuously through the northern Great Plains region following buffalo patterns. The Sioux depended on bison for most of their food source, clothing, and shelter.
First of all, Native Americans were settled on a hotbed of natural resources which included oil and precious metals such as silver and gold. There was also much fertile land that would entice farmers and frontiersmen to move out west. On this land there was so much potential economic opportunity for farmers, cattle drivers, miners and many other occupations. The government developed the popular public misconception that the indians were misusing the land and that Americans had the right to take advantage of the opportunities that lie in the west. These ideas led to the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 which authorized encroachment of Indian lands by the US government in order to divide up reservations and control Indian activity.