Throughout Thomas Friedman’s book The World is Flat, he discusses how technology, certain people and other factors have made the earth smaller and flatter in a figurative sense. However, the most interesting topic in my opinion is the Dell Theory. This essay will talk about what the Dell Theory is and why it seems . In chapter 16 of the book, Friedman talks about the Dell Theory and that it can help the world achieve long-term peace. The theory states that “No two countries that are both part of a global supply chain, like Dell’s, will ever fight a war against each other as long as they are both part of the same global supply chain.” (Friedman, Pg. 587). Friedman also states that “people embedded in major global supply chains don’t want to fight old-time wars anymore.” (Friedman, Pg. 587). …show more content…
This could help with preserving long-term peace among countries and overall peace in the world. That is what the Dell Theory is and why I find it important because it could help end war between countries. One example where the Dell theory worked to a certain degree was the “case of India and Pakistan” (Friedman, Pg. 591). However, while the theory only worked on only India it was still important. This is because around 2002 India and Pakistan were building up their armed forces and placing them on their borders and the possibility of a nuclear exchange between the two was becoming more likely to happen. However, because several major american companies had facilities in India, a war between Pakistan and India would not only have serious impacts on India, but also on the rest of the world. This is because things like computer chips that are used in cell phones are manufactured in Bangalore along with tracking lost luggage on British and Delta airways are
Abrams also stressed a “one war” concept that put equal emphasis on military operations, improvement of the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces, and pacification – all of which are codependent so that the better we do in one, the more our chance of progress in others (18). The changes in tactics under Abrams, and in the concept of the nature of the war, and even the enemy reaction to battlefield reserves, by no means meant an end to fierce combat, or even to large-scale military operations (138). America’s principal national objective became peace. Abrams policy proved to be better than the policy of attrition. The policy of attrition simply meant, under those circumstances, a very prolonged type of warfare, whereas the U.S. can clear and hold, and keep an area secure, and keep the enemy out.
The second document highlights the National Security Council 68, a central document of the Cold War that laid out the strategic foundation for American foreign policy after the devastating decline of western European powers during World War II left the United States and Soviet Union as the dominant nations. The National Security Council argues that the Soviet Union poses a threat due to “being animated by a new fanatic faith” in communism to impose “absolute authority over the world” (Doc 2). This type of behavior is anti-ethical to the American values, so the fight between America and the Soviet Union was inevitable. The document outlined possible responses of isolation, diplomatic efforts to negotiate, or the rapid buildup of strength of
" Paragraph 8. " Foreign military intimidation, civil uprisings, and ethnic conflicts became increasingly common." Paragraph
On the other hand, Cynthia J. Van Zandt argues that despite military disputes among the two bodies, trade alliances between the groups continued. Van Zandt further claimed that relational failure stemmed from conflict among various Europeans nations advocating for dominance over the New World. The overarching purpose of the argument is to determine
Secretary of State George Marshall gave a speech explaining a plan for European recovery which known today as The Marshall Plan. It states that if the United States does not do whatever it takes to help restore normal economic health to the world, “there can be no political stability or peace.” (Document
It helped bring countries together. People were now beginning to realize that even though they were of different religions, the could still get along. Before trade erupted people focused on their religions, and they would distance themselves from anyone who did not also believe in their religion, but now people are beginning to realize that even though they do not share religions, they can share other ideas and practices, which brought together many different countries who previously were enemies (Doc. 1). For example, in a letter from the Great Moghul Jahangir of India to James I, the king of England, Jahangir expresses his utter joy that he has towards James I. England had now given merchants free liberty without any restraints to gain favor with Moghul Jahangir (Doc. 7). This shows how countries are now starting to work with each other and get along.
Do you ever wonder find yourself wondering how we lived in a world without the internet, smartphones, and televisions? This new world of technology that we live in today is do to the globalization “super story”, which enables us to put things in ways we, individually, can comprehend. Thomas Friedman, an American journalist and three time Pulitzer Prize winner, suggest in his article “Globalization: The Super Story”, that the world has shifted from the international Cold War system to the new international system of Globalization. In other words, the world has adapted to a system of integration rather than divide. Overall, I perceived the article to be terrifying convincing, yet, upon further review I discovered to issues and lack of empathy from Friedman 's point of view.
As Disrupters The strength of future militaries will be compared to our own; the expansive reach of the US military is the largest on Earth. From conflicts in South America to the Middle East and Asia, the US has always thrived during wartime, gaining much of its power from the aftermath of World War II. By much of the world today our country is seen as democratic invaders; bringing a message of democracy and freedom while still firmly holding our weapons. In this way, our country has shaped the world drastically; influencing both the progress of technology and the equivalent sizes of foreign militaries.
For Mearsheimer, this is the very basis of realistic thinking and in turn equates international order to anarchy. 2. Great powers maintain and continue to acquire militaristic capabilities in order to eradicate the idea of weakness and establish sovereignty over lesser powers. 3. A country can never be sure of another country’s motive hence each party is left
Milton Friedman revolutionized free market thinking. He believed in a free market as the best solution for the stability of an economy. Basing his theories on Adam Smith’s “invisible hand”, Friedman further developed Smith’s theory. In short, Friedman’s Neoliberalism can be described through one of his quotes on the social responsibility of business, “There is one and only one social responsibility of business — to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits, so long as it stays within the rules of the game” (Cooney, 2012). Friedman’s belief of the market’s perfection is based on the assumption that no actor would agree to a transaction if they did not find it fitting for themselves (Friedman, 1975).
Hardly a convenient place to hold a war.” (Author Unknown in Schloeffel, J,
The first great-war shattered the human mind so profound that out of its aftermaths’ emerged a fresh discipline (in 1919 at the University of Whales known to us as International Relations) proposed to prevent war. “It was deemed by the scholars that the study of International Politics shall find the root cause of the worlds political problems and put forward solutions to help politicians solve them” (Baylis 2014:03). International Relations happened to play the role of a ‘correcting-mechanism’ restoring the world order of peace and amity by efforting at its best to maintain the worlds’ status quo. However with the emergence of a second world war much more massive that the first put at stake all the values of that young discipline of IR. The
In today’s modern society technology plays a huge role in everyday life. Technology has a big position in education. Today students use laptops for school on an everyday basis to take notes, work on assignments, and research. Many people agree that, when it comes to education, technology can either be very harmful or very helpful. Timothy D. Snyder, a history professor at the University of Yale has written five award-winning books.
Apple states in their Form K-10 Report (2017, p.1) they are “committed to bringing the best user experience to its customers through innovative hardware, software and services.” In an Industry where profit margins are low, technologies are constantly evolving and competition is high it is essential that Apple continues to offer innovative and simple products that increases customer experience (Heracleous, 2013) so to maintain a competitive advantage. A variety of tools have been used to evaluate Apple’s external and internal environment, including the PESTEL (Appendix 1), Porter’s Five Forces Analysis (Appendix 2), SWOT (Appendix 3). It is envisaged that the information derived from these tools and the associated analysis will support Apple’s CEO to make strategic decisions that addresses the challenges ahead in the short term, ensuring Apple can be competitive in the long term (Rothaermal, 2017).
In this paper, I have attempted to present an understanding of Pakistan-India conflict by using constructivism theory of international relations. There are many reasons other than strategic reason causing this conflict like differences in ideologies, norms and beliefs. There are also cultural differences between these two nations. 2. Pakistan-India Conflict an overview South Asia is considered a region of great importance in the world.