Public Schools: Difference Between Public And Private Schools

Fees are good for school sports because the money that parents pay for their child to play a sport goes towards equipment for that sport. In the text, it said “ A lack of money has forced some schools to charge students and parents for courses and books. Free books and classes are more important than free sports programs. Schools should charge students for sports before they make them pay for books and classes. After all, education should come first at schools.

School choice is the idea that parents should be able to choose which school they want to send their children to, whether they enroll them to private, charter, parochial or virtual schools, or just decide to homeschool them. “Charter schools are our best hope for meaningful change in education. Yet, many parents are leery of charter schools or confused by them.” (“Should all Schools”) Some politicians and teachers believe that school choice takes away money from them since they do use tax dollars.

Obviously the wealthy will have their children in well-developed schools and the lower classes will have their children at mediocre public schools. The curriculum may be the same but the discipline in classes are highly different. For example, a child from a low income family is usually brought up in less developed communities where their parents may not have an education that excels over the 12th grade. So school may not seem as big of a deal to them. Whereas parents that are wealthy most likely graduated from a 4 yr University with a Masters or Ph.D. Now this child has high standards to go to school and excel in their studies.

Because only few insurance companies would want to ensure armed school, it can be assumed that the prices for insurance will be significantly higher. FLASHCARD 11, continued to report how insurance companies calculate arming schools will increase rather than decrease the risk of a school being attacked. Diamond explains how teachers will be put through training regularly because the training will be lengthy in time, it will be wasteful and unproductive for teachers. With teachers spending useless time in training, they are spending less time towards participating in education or preparing for education; therefore, decreasing the quality of education received by students. With all things considered, and despite the views of those in favor of arming teachers, arming teachers will not be an efficient use of

Gladwell comments that when the educational environments change, “virtually all of the advantages that wealthy students have over poor students are the result of differences in the way privileged kids learn while they are not in school (258)”. The wealthy students are able to indulge in extra curricular activities, books, programs that enable them to advance their knowledge. This opportunity and support is rarely presented to the lower-class families, because parents have a harder time paying for programs and activities, providing educational support, as well as providing time while they are

These results were exactly what they predicted, based off the deplorable but realistic bias that the majority of people tend to feel better about doing things when they get a reward. This quality of work for reward applies to many people, students included. When Stacy Priestly, a teacher and parent, was interviewed about the topic, she agreed with using money as a motivator, stating, "I pay my son for doing well in school … he has become very dedicated and seems to be doing well socially in school too" (Flannery 4). This displays that parents genuinely believe that using a motivator for school can be effective at increasing morale and work ethic in their children as students. Another reason why students should earn money for their achievements is it could cause a possible decline in the amount of missing/late assignments from students that teachers would have to deal

Education is always giving people a good opportunity to have a good life and future. When people have higher education, they will have more choice to choose what they want to do, and how to manage their life. I think another good way to reduce child poverty in our country is to support everybody to get into the school, so they can learn and plan about the future. Premarital pregnancy is a big problem for the young generation who still in school or college. According to experts, “Teenage mothers are less likely to finish high school and are more likely to live in poverty, depend on public assistance, and be in poor health than slightly older mothers.

Charter Schools are publicly funded independent private schools established by teachers, parents, or community groups, under the terms of a charter with a local or national authority. Charter Schools are public schools of choice, meaning that families chose them for their kids. Also teachers who work at a charter school usually fall under more flexible certification requirements than other public school teachers. Charter schools are often similar to magnet schools they often offer special programs such as Math, Engineering, and Environmental science. Also if The Charter school you are trying to enroll in gets too popular they will sometimes use a lottery system which will fill in the vacancies.

We all know in this world not everything is fair. Some are less fortunate and need help, even some kids. So a reason we should pay kids is to help out the struggling children support themselves. 21% of children live in poverty almost 15 million, so if schools paid those kids to do good in school then they wouldn't have to worry about if they don't have enough food because the school would provide for them by paying them.

For those in the secondary market the lifestyle that brings with it may force children to follow the same path. A child may be required to take up a job while in school to help support the family that isn’t meeting its financial demands. While a child is both working and going to school. It can be argued that the school progression is going to suffer, possibly forcing the child into the secondary labor market when they reach adulthood, because it is what they know. However, it is not guaranteed as many young people who start in the secondary labor market are able to transition out.

When it comes to the secondary school level, there are many private institutions that provide easier education than public schools simply because you are

No Makin It”. In Mcleod’s book, the view of schools as a sorting machine shows us how schools are not a place for equality. We put students into different tracts such as AP and IB, creating a hierarchy or stratifying system (Mcleod). Even though my parents aren’t very wealthy, a private school has put me higher in the stratifying system and pushed me to try hard and get good grades so I could get into a good college. This is another aspect of my life that has been socially constructed as normal.

Teaching is a privilege because it is an opportunity to provide students with a blessing of knowledge that they may not be able to obtain from home. Minorities from low-income areas most likely do not live in the best conditions, therefore they need to utilize the classroom as a safe haven. Knowing that these student probably cannot afford to get a tutor for the SATs or even study properly because they do not understand the context, makes me want to be a teacher who would offer tutoring sessions for free, find

The establishment of these schools also means the “loss of funding for traditional public schools, leading to fiscal inefficiency” (US Connect). The pro side of this debate will argue that charter schools foster innovation and are worth the loss of funding for traditional schools in the long run, however if this is the case, then why have many charter schools across the nation turned into nothing more than money making opportunities for entrepreneurs with very little interest in educational innovation? Not only are these schools taking away from traditional public schools, but they also discourage students with disabilities by counseling them out instead of providing accommodations. This refusal to serve disabled students means traditional public schools are left with a higher-than-expected concentration of students requiring additional resources because they are mandated by

The Piedmont community median household income ranges at $207,222 compared to the significantly lower $56,944 of the Castlemont community (CDE 2013). Piedmont’s community median household income is one of the many factors that assists in providing the necessary resources to continue investing in better education. In contrast, Castlemont’s low-income earning families are not able to directly invest in their children’s education and have to rely on government assistance and investment which is scarce. The increasingly prosperous higher income community of Piedmont High School allows many to invest time, money, and influence to ensure their children 's academic success at various levels of education. As stated in lecture, public resources fund the expansion of post-secondary education and it is obvious that investment in our public education is necessary (Kelsey, 9/28/15).