The symbolism and allegorical features of the film are both extremely vague and contradictory, making any one interpretation difficult to justify and easy to disprove. When interpreting a work as an allegory, it is always worth paying some attention to the intent of the writers, and the scriptwriters of High Noon intended to write it as an allegory for blacklisting. The easiest way to see this interpretation is to see Sheriff Kane as a victim of blacklisting. His fruitless search for help in fighting Miller symbolizes how alone those brought in front of the House of Un-American Activities were. Their former friends would not help them,
They both express foolish qualities throughout the stories, but underneath their foolishness is a hidden wisdom, which resolve the conflict of the story. Both Alan’s and Jenko’s actions appear ambiguous, sometimes more detrimental than helpful. While their foolishness never seems to assist anyone in the story, their actions actually become the vehicle for which their stories can move forward. In Alan’s case, he accesses one of his major flaws was cheating in gambling. This garner negative attitudes from the other characters during the beginning of the story, but his flaw becomes a necessary component for obtaining the money to free Doug.
Swift’s “Modest Proposal” is more effective in explaining what is happening because the topic of overpopulation and hunger is relatable to what is going on in the world. Pope’s seems to be a very distant topic, because no one goes and steals hair and is forced to die for it. Without the satire that both used it would be an uninteresting story. It would be difficult to decipher if the story was supposed to be funny, serious, or
By today's standards, what the suitors did was unacceptable, but not worthy of death. Their behaviors were unprecedented and rude, but not to the extent of death. Poseidon’s quote is a bit more complicated, as this is the first point where we see Poseidon trouble Odysseus, although he is
However, life does not follow plans. Surprises and unexpected outcomes and natural accidents that may temporarily hinder someone from pursuing an end goal. Mistakes are also unavoidable, but the regular frequency of them becomes problematic and can pose as a serious roadblock. There is a highly underexplored theme of the play: inability for individuals to recognize the emotional support-both eponymous character need. The mistakes that arise from Prince Escalus, Friar Laurence, and the Montague-Capulet feud, all contribute to the tragic fate of the two star-crossed lovers.
While sinning and communism are not necessarily good things, there was no time taken to grasp a slightly more progressive viewpoint. Traditional communism does not work and sinning is morally wrong. This is certain, but the actions taken by these authority figures is unprofessional and alarms the general public, creating distrust and panic. It is a leader’s duty to inform themselves first and take a reasonable
Within this theme of ambiguity, Gatsby's morals and actions contradict each other because loving Daisy and changing all the things he didn't like about himself for her is a chivalrous action, but how he changes himself is knavish. Fitzgerald proves Gatsby is a good person when Gatsby
The characters have a sense of a dirty, raw vulgarity to them. With characters like this the plot could almost build itself, as conflict is almost completely inevitable. Each person in this book has a simple lifestyle, but when these personalities and lifestyles clash, it creates conflict rapidly. Scarseth gives reasoning that even simple people can experience tragedy. Not even the simplest of people can avoid it and Scarseth relates it to the book by saying this: “…simplest dream of the simplest man – even poor dumb Lennie – cannot come true.
It 's the environment and influencers. You can 't really blame the person when they are surrounded by an environment of the same mindsets. Racism is something that I always frown upon so instead too getting mad and pointing blames it 's important to educate. So the wronging as argument with no reason reasoning tend to never lead to progress. “Often causes then to appear;these create for them a frame of reference