DNA was the only thing that contributed to a little girl's death one friday night, when she collapsed from a heart attack suddenly. The doctor said it was simply in her genes, but what does that really mean? Certain mutations and differences can transpire in someone's genes which causes particular genetic diseases and variances to occur. By taking samples of a person's DNA, which is what our genes consist of, doctors can determine mutations in genes that can impact specific traits and illnesses. While this is very intriguing to me, I wanted to understand how accurate genetic testing is, and how it affects people's everyday lives. My search consists of uncovering more about genetic testing itself at its core, and will include how much these tests cost, what companies provide answers to discovering what lays in our …show more content…
This is one of the most important guiding questions in my journey to explore deeper into the thoughts of genetic testing and how it ties together what possible effects it can have on human lives. I initially thought, if someone were to get genetically tested, they could find exactly what disease they have and how they could cure it. However, that not the case. As I was watching the documentary Cracking your Genetic Code, they discussed how genetic diseases can be very hard to diagnose if that alteration in a person's genes has not yet been found in previous patients. By analyzing many different people, doctors were able to find the breast cancer mutation. For example, this would have not been able to occur without testing patients and finding certain similar alterations in different DNA samples. It is also how they discovered that seventeen genes lead to colon cancer (Weintraub Arlene). There are still many undiagnosed variations of genes out there, and genetic testing could help find more answers concerning
Researches at Hopkins, frequently performed test on their patients, for example injecting them with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. Since they saw nothing wrong doctors
I agree. In some cases, knowing that you have a mutation and will be affected with the disease could be very emotional for an individual. One never knows how they will respond to the result and pretesting counseling may not fully prepare the individual for the result. One question that has been raised is should genetic counseling be allowed for diseases that are not treatable? It is thought that if an individual knows they will develop a condition that has no treatment it could cause psychological harm, stigmatization, and possible discrimination.
DNA testing has been changing lives for the wrongfully convicted. Innocent people are being released from prisons because of DNA. Ronald Cotton was fortunate to have been found innocent thanks to DNA evidence after being imprisoned for years. It may not always be that way, though, there are still people being locked up once DNA has ruled them out.
Who Was She? A DNA Test Only Opened New Mysteries Libby Copeland, in “Who Was She? A DNA Test Only Opened New Mysteries,” discusses the increased popularity of DNA testing, the process, and the impact the results can have on the people who choose this path. In the article, Copeland effectively uses structure, tone, word choice and other rhetoric devices to establish her purpose of informing her readers about the effects of DNA testing. Copeland writes the article not only to inform, but also to engage and interest the general public, or anyone considering DNA testing.
According to the article “DNA Fingerprinting: Cracking Our Genetic “Barcode” (2009) with the technology that is provided today, scientist have an easier way to study genetics. Genetics is important because it can help with disease risk. With this knowledge, it will help to know if a person is at risk for a certain disease because it runs in the family. In the article “Can Technology Help Us Put an End to Animal Experimentation” (2012), it talks about why using lab animals, such as rats and monkeys were useful. Lab animals such as rats, have a similar body set up like humans.
In this time and age, countless advances in technology have been made, including ones that respond to Regan’s point. These modern methods include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues, advanced computer-modeling techniques, and studies with human volunteers. These may even lead to more accurate results. I argue that animal testing is wasteful because it prolongs the suffering of humans waiting for results of misleading experiments. Not all tests done to animals apply to humans, for our genetic makeup and composition differ from each other.
For one, an advanced use of genetics identification would provide police with a much needed aid. As the movie once again showed, crimes could be solved muchly as even the smallest sliver of events or objects that prove something, or shows about a whole life history. Also, advanced medical technology can improve the quality of life. Sometimes (not all!) , it may be a benefit to know what illnesses your child may be at risk for.
It also helps doctors determine medicines for certain individuals. As for risk genetic testing carries low risk after the second trimester in pregnancy after that it’s an ethical issue. In the scenario the parents find out they are carriers of cystic fibrosis, which some specialist recommended against couples having children. Like i stated there has been major advances from genetic testing that has lead to medicines and a planned cure in 25
The genetic counselor will go over the information in the questionnaire to gather and evaluate your personal and family history. They will decide with you what are the next steps to better understand your personal risk and to determine what level of information is right for you. What if they recommend genetic testing?
Genetic testing has raised an ethical debate. According to Mand, Gillam, Debatyckis, and Duncan (2012) neither argument has taken a strong dominance over the other. Mand et al. (2012) states that “the debate has adopted a to-and-fro pattern defined by parallel lines of argument, rarely intersecting and relying heavily on fundamentally opposed positions on core principles of bioethics with no reconciliation in sight”(Discussion, para.3).
Many serious diseases and physical deformities can occur due to inherited genetic traits. Essentially, genetic screening tests identify changes in chromosomes, genes, and proteins. The results are utilized to determine an individual’s chance of developing or passing on a particular disorder. The most common methods of screening include molecular, chromosomal, and biochemical genetic testing. Genetic screening has both benefits and disadvantages, and therefore the decision to become tested is extremely difficult.
would you want to receive genetic testing? nowadays, genetic testing is an issue that many people debate. It is a type of a medical test that identifies changes in chromosomes, genes, or proteins. The results of testing can help people to make the decisions about managing their health care. However, the results can affect very much to people who had tested.
A missing chromosome can affect the persons quality of life or a rare genetic mutation can also have an impact. A duplicate chromosome 21 cause down syndrome and other mutations can cause many other complications. A child’s development can also be affect by genetics, parents expect their children to be able to do different tasks such as speak around the age of two. If not it can be worry some because maybe the child has a speech impediment or the child could be mute and thus development is lacking. For example Helen Keller who had many impediments, still managed to develop mentally, however it was different for her than for someone without the same complications.
Thank your for responds regarding my research. The way you present your argument is valid but that is just a few. To add on what you just said, women of modern times are being pressured into terminating a pregnancy because they may feel like it is the only choice after genetic testing results. My question though is, what happens when the happens if the general motive of genetic testing is for the good of humans in a work place? would that be considered discrimination?
The biggest problem is that couples are waiting longer to have children. Young people need to be aware of this information. Thus if a couple is both over the age of 35, there should be increased awareness that genetic testing is needed.