Angelo the deputy to the duke or second in command may just seem like another sex-crazed idiot and that may be true but he is also two people walking around in the same body. How you ask is it possible for two people to occupy the same singular body? Dr. Jackal and Mr. Hyde come to mind when thinking of the two versions of Angelo sharing a body by day he works to rid the city of Vienna of all sexual impurities but by night he seeks the virtue of a woman promised to a life of abstinence. This complete contrast of character is why Angelo clearly suffers from dual personality disorder and why he is top different people one “good” and one bad.
When first introduced to Angelo you see him as a well-mannered obedient second in command to the duke a model citizen. “Always obedient to your grace’s will, I come to know your pleasure” (pg. 845,25). Angelo say this quote with two sets of thought present almost as if the response is two different
…show more content…
“which had you rather: that the most just law now took your brother’s life, or, to redeem him, Give up your body to such sweet uncleanness (Pg. 854,52). This is the point where the different version of Angelo shows himself the most and you can see his true intentions. Instead of trying to help Isabella save her brother from a crime that shouldn’t really be considered a crime that is like being arrested for opening and drinking a soda before you buy it at the supermarket. Your thirsty and have every intention of purchasing it at the check out lanes but you thirst can’t wait until then. It was as if it was all an elaborate scheme to sleep with a woman that had devoted herself to god through nun work and lifelong abstinence. The temptation of forbidden fruit was too great for Angelo to handle so he had to come up with a way to get what he wanted no matter what it cost
Due to these difference in personalities and sense of duty, the author, McMutry, displays several lines of dialog and illustrates the behavior of various people when they’re in front of Augustus and Call. After his
Archbishop Antoninus responded to the high class citizen of Florence, “'it was not necessary to [to petition him], for if he was in the right, justice would be rendered to him, as it would be to the lowliest man in Florence'”
This was the moment that Antonio began to wonder if the priest was as powerful as everyone believed. He realized that ideas he once thought were true may not be. After this moment Antonio’s doubts increased, and the last resort of answers would come with the day of his communion, when he would finally hear the word of God. Once Antonio ate the flesh of God, he was sure that all of his questions would be answered, however, when he asked God all he received was “...the whistling of the wind filling the empty space” (pg 187). He needed answers in this moment more than ever, and “...could not understand how the power of God could fail.
In the story Florence is depicted as a longing atheist at heart, questioning religious ideology with strong diction. A quote displaying Florence's religious views is in chapter 14 where Florence states, "There ain't no such thing as a virgin birth," Florence said looking down at the decapitated doll. " The concept of virgin birth is apparent in Catholicism and Christianity with the birth of Jesus proving the theory. Florence not believing in virgin birth shows he is atheist because he is saying the birth of Jesus could not have been possible. Antonio although a ‘true Christian' relates to this questioning of religion Florence experiences.
Furthermore, the author uses this quote to promote the retaliation against silence. “I will not let silence wrap itself around my indecision. I will tell Christian that he is a lion, a sanctuary of bravery and brilliance. I will ask that
Edgar Allan Poe’s short story William Wilson, seems to be about ones suffering with a personality disorder. The boy or the narrator of the story seems to have a multiple personality, meaning he has more than one personality, more than one identity in the same body. The person telling us the story, tells us how a boy with the same name as him (however this boy is no relation to him or his parents), the same birthday, same height, same demeanor, and whom arrived at the same school as him on the same day. He seems frightened by this other boy, who has similar traits to his own, but he wants to rule all the boys in the school, and this other boy does not go along with him. While at school I believe that when he snuck into the “other” William Wilsons
“I flooded the sticky piece of bread with hot saliva and swallowed it. Now I would know the answers! I bowed my head and waited for him to speak to me.” (pg 220) Antonio believes that all his questions about God and life are answered after he takes communion, which is not the case.
This essay tries to answer two philosophical points of view the Platonic which is more about living a good and just life or the Machiavellian which is summed up by; the means justify the ends. Both of these views have their own ethical way to bring about justice in the beholders eyes. The scene I’m going to use portrays the final part of the trial of Private Santiago's murder, Colonel Jessup is testifying and being cross examined by Lieutenant Kaffee, from the film A Few Good Men.
Oswald diagnoses Frankie with multiple personalities; also known as Dissociative Identity Disorder. Dissociative Identity Disorder, also referenced to as DID, is brought on by traumas that occur earlier in someone’s life. Dr. Oswald uses several different types of treatments to trigger memories of these events that caused her to develop the disorder. He begins with using different kinds of hallucinogens, to make her vulnerable enough to allow these personalities to come out. This system is a hit or miss, on which personality presents itself.
This becomes an issue for Antonio because he wasn’t really taught as a child growing up in a catholic home with catholic idealism that he had choice to decide who he was going to become in the future. Anaya tries to structure his argument that noticing different identies Antonio becomes confused around his childhood and how he was raised as catholic. The author implies that once an induvial is taught a set of idealism that certain individual will in the future follow those idealisms and keep the sacred. This ties into ethics and values stating that they structucted at a very young. Implying the 1st couple are the most crucial to make a person identity and what type of person they will add to
When Antonio first accepted the Catholic god in the form of the Eucharist, he “received him gladly” and waited for the “thousand questions” that “ pushed through” his “mind” to be answered. Even though Antonio waited for the answers “the Voice . . did not answer” (Anaya, 221). Anaya’s use of diction in this excerpt, developed the mood that, Antonio was disappointed in the Catholic god. Moreover, the quote depicted how Antonio did not get any answers to questions which haunted him for so long.
An occurring location in the book is Rosie’s House which is a brothel and is supposed to represent the root of sin and juxtaposes Antonio’s innocence. An example of this is in one of Antonio’s dreams in where his brothers are drawn into Rosie’s house. “The water wet her blouse and the thin cotton fabric clung around the curve of her breasts. No! I shouted in my dream, I cannot enter, I cannot think those thoughts.
A certain loss in Antonio’s life is his late friend , Florence, a classmate sincerely against God. Antonio is saddened and worried about Florence and attempts to let Florence at least believes in something, like the Golden Carp. Before Antonio can introduce Florence to the peaceful pagan god and make him realize that not all gods are powerful and intimidating, Florence dies drowning. After the drowning of Florence, Antonio is forced to question the restriction of Catholicism, once again. Antonio looks in the direction of religion for help as he can feel the innocence fading.
Which had you rather, that the most just law now took your brother’s life; or, to redeem him, Give up your body to such sweet uncleanness as she that he hath stain’d?” ( 2.4.1075). In this scene Angelo is revealing his whole plan to Isabella and is expecting her to be submissive and accept his offer. “If he be like your brother, for his sake Is he pardon 'd; and, for your lovely sake, Give me your hand and say you will be mine. He is my brother too: but fitter time for that.
Dimmesdale’s sin was the most unholy and dangerous of all those presented in the novel, and affects those around him to such an extent as to make their lives worse than they would have been if he never existed. Although Dimmesdale was a devout protestant, he still believed that God would never forgive him and that he would live without the grace given to the women that Jesus saved on the Mount of Olives in